Showing 1 - 10 of 327 news articles
Each week, RPX publishes the latest news on patent litigation and market trends. Never miss a headline. Get them delivered right to your inbox.
IPValue’s Monterey Research Sues Renesas, Alleged Customer DENSO
New Patent Litigation
Monterey Research, LLC has brought four more patents into the litigation campaign that it began back in November 2019. It has done so through a new Eastern District of Texas suit filed against both DENSO and Renesas Electronics (2:24-cv-00238), DENSO as the alleged customer of the wide array of accused semiconductor devices and integrated circuits, including certain embedded flash memory devices, as well as microcontrollers. Past defendants in this campaign include AMD, Broadcom, Marvell, and Qualcomm, as well as Nanya Technology and STMicro, the cases against which are on the verge of closure after extensive activity before the USPTO over the patents asserted there.
April 13, 2024
Daedalus Prime Sues MediaTek Alone in Latest Complaint
New Patent Litigation
In August 2022, Daedalus Prime LLC, an entity associated with Daedalus Group LLC, launched its sole litigation campaign with a set of actions, one before the International Trade Commission (ITC) against MediaTek, NXP Semiconductors, certain automakers, and certain automaker suppliers; and three filed in the District of Delaware, one centered around each of MediaTek, NXP, and Qualcomm (but naming as defendants subsets of the proposed ITC respondents). Now, the plaintiff has sued MediaTek (2:24-cv-00235) alone, this time in the Eastern District of Texas. The asserted patents, described in the complaint as “relate[d] to groundbreaking improvements to microprocessor circuitry”, are broadly directed to various aspects of computer circuitry and semiconductor fabrication. The defendant is accused of infringement through the provision of devices containing microprocessors and systems-on-chip (SoCs), including certain Dimensity-series SoCs, that are based on the ARMv8.2 architecture and later.
April 12, 2024
Eireog Innovations Follows Up Campaign Launch by Suing Lenovo
New Patent Litigation
Eireog Innovations Limited has followed up its litigation debut last week—with separate Eastern District of Texas suits against Cisco, Fortinet, IBM, and Palo Alto Networks—by filing a case against Lenovo (2:24-cv-00239) in the same district. The plaintiff asserts the same four patents, again targeting the provision of products, this time ranging from laptops to servers, that incorporate certain AMD and Intel-based CPUs. This campaign appears to be at least the ninth from an Atlantic IP Services Limited plaintiff to hit Lenovo and/or its subsidiary Motorola Mobility.
April 12, 2024
California Court Dismisses “Hotly Pursued” License Claim, Intel Turns Back to Texas
In Case You Missed It
Intel has been trying to litigate whether an earlier license agreement with Finjan, Inc. provides a defense in the multidistrict campaign of VLSI Technology LLC against it. Last week, Northern District of California Judge Beth Labson Freeman ruled that a forum selection clause in that license agreement requires any claim be brought in Delaware, the court dismissing the lone remaining license claim for forum non conveniens rather than transferring it to the District of Delaware. Also last week, Intel filed a motion to amend its answer, defenses, and counterclaims in the Western District of Texas to add the license defense there.
April 8, 2024
Atlantic IP Pegs Four Defendants Again
New Patent Litigation
Eireog Innovations Limited, an Atlantic Services IP Limited plaintiff, has filed its first cases over the portfolio of about a dozen patents that it received from NXP last November. The defendants are Cisco (2:24-cv-00224), Fortinet (2:24-cv-00225), IBM (2:24-cv-00226), and Palo Alto Networks (2:24-cv-00227), each accused of infringing the same four patents over the provision of products, ranging from blade servers to firewalls, that incorporate certain AMD- and/or Intel-based CPUs. This set of defendants is familiar to Atlantic IP.
April 6, 2024
ACQIS Wins Its Second Infringement Verdict—11 Years After Its First One
Patent Litigation Feature
A Western District of Texas jury has returned an $18M infringement verdict in one of the longest-running patent litigation campaigns still active. On March 22, the jury found that ASUSTek infringed two patents asserted against it by inventor-controlled ACQIS LLC, following an extended back-and-forth over whether a claim construction ruling that led to a judgment of noninfringement in prior litigation should have a preclusive effect here. The verdict in this case is the plaintiff’s second, the first handed down in 2011 in the campaign’s inaugural lawsuit—which was filed all the way back in April 2009.
March 30, 2024
DPUs the Subject of New West Texas Complaint
New Patent Litigation
XtreamEdge, Inc. (as patent owner) and Concurrent Ventures, LLC (as exclusive licensee) have filed what appears to be their first litigation, suing AMD (Pensando Systems) (1:24-cv-00335) in the Western District of Texas. The complaint targets the provision of “all products including or related to AMD’s DPU [data processing unit] technology”, which specialized units the plaintiffs characterize as necessary “[a]s data becomes even more firmly entrenched in society”. Five patents in this technological area are now in suit.
March 30, 2024
IP Bridge Returns to US Litigation
New Patent Litigation
IP Bridge, Inc. subsidiary Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 has sued Western Digital (1:24-cv-00342) and Seagate Technology (1:24-cv-00341) in separate District of Delaware complaints. Three patents generally related to a “magnetoresistive device comprising a magnetic tunnel junction structure”, based on a magnesium oxide layer, are aimed at the provision of a wide array of memory devices, including “read/write heads” for hard disk drives (HDDs), as well as HDDs incorporating such read/write heads. IP Bridge pleads that Seagate is familiar with the asserted portfolio based on prior litigation in Japan.
March 22, 2024
Full Federal Circuit Declines to Revisit VLSI Verdict Reversal Amid Further PTAB Sanctions Intrigue
Patent Litigation Feature
The multidistrict campaign waged by VLSI Technology LLC against Intel has captured headlines for a variety of reasons in the past several months. In December, the Federal Circuit toppled a $2.2B verdict in the first VLSI case to go to trial—wiping out a Texas jury’s finding of infringement for one patent, reversing and remanding as to damages for a second patent, and also reviving the defendant’s license defense in that case. The full Federal Circuit declined to rehear that decision earlier this month. Meanwhile, also hanging over that proceeding are a set of closely watched inter partes reviews (IPRs) filed by two third parties, OpenSky Industries and Patent Quality Assurance (PQA), that led to the invalidation of both patents from that verdict amidst accusations of gamesmanship from both petitioners. On March 11, USPTO Director Kathi Vidal denied OpenSky’s latest attempt to avoid a $413K attorney fee judgment that she imposed for its abuse of the IPR process—though she did grant a reprieve on timing.
March 17, 2024
Judge Gilstrap Grapples with Another Foreign Law Issue
Patent Litigation Feature
Earlier this year, Northern District of California Judge Jon S. Tigar rejected an unusual argument from plaintiff Lauri Valjakka urging the court to apply Finnish common law concerning the appropriation of abandoned shipwrecks and piles of discarded leather scraps to save his case. Then, Eastern District of Texas Judge Rodney Gilstrap held that French law, which follows “the privity rule”, applies to the contract giving rise to a FRAND obligation; and that Samsung provided insufficient evidence under French law that plaintiff G+ Communications LLC could be considered the alter ego of ZTE. For the latest brush with foreign law in domestic patent cases it is back to Judge Gilstrap, who just denied a motion to dismiss on a license defense that brushed up against a ruling under German law.
March 8, 2024