-
Versata Software, Inc. et al v. Internet Brands, Inc. f/k/a CarsDirect.com et al DC CAFC
- 2:08-cv-00313
- E.D. Tex.
- Judge: William C. Bryson +2
- Filed: 08/08/2008
- Closed: 07/30/2012
- Latest Docket Entry: 04/22/2014
- PACER
- Docket updated daily
2
Plaintiffs
3
Defendants
1
Accused
Product
2
Patents-in-Suit
1,453
Days in
Litigation
-
Versata Software, Inc. et al v. Internet Brands, Inc. f/k/a CarsDirect.com et al DC CAFC
- 2:08-cv-00313
- E.D. Tex.
- Judge: William C. Bryson +2
- Filed: 08/08/2008
- Closed: 07/30/2012
- Latest Docket Entry: 04/22/2014
- PACER
- Docket updated daily
Market Sector
E-commerce and Software
Assigned Judge
Previously Presiding
Outcome Summary
- Patent Information
-
Validity & Enforceability
Claim # | Claim Text | Outcome |
---|---|---|
1 |
A method of comparing products wherein at least one of the products is automatically generated, the method comprising: receiving data from a first computer system, wherein the received data includes product configuration data; processing the received
view more
|
Enforceable and Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 373 Entry 344 Entry 286 |
10 |
A computer system comprising: a processor; a computer readable medium coupled to said processor; and computer code encoded in said computer readable medium and executable by said processor to cause said processor to: receive data from a first
view more
|
Enforceable and Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 373 Entry 344 Entry 286 |
13 |
The method of claim 10, wherein said first product configuration is a first vehicle and said second product configuration is a second vehicle.
|
Enforceable and Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 373 Entry 344 Entry 286 |
14 |
The computer system of claim 10 further comprising code encoded in said computer readable medium and executable by said processor to cause said processor to: select said first product configuration from at least one stored product configuration.
|
Enforceable and Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 373 Entry 344 Entry 286 |
17 |
The computer system of claim 10 further comprising code encoded in said computer readable medium and executable by said processor to cause said processor to: automatically generate a third product configuration, wherein said third product
view more
|
Enforceable and Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 373 Entry 344 Entry 286 |
18 |
The computer system of claim 17, wherein said third product configuration is also comparable to said first product configuration with regard to a product price.
|
Enforceable and Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 373 Entry 344 Entry 286 |
19 |
A computer program product comprising code encoded in said computer program product to cause a computer system to: receive data from a first computer system, wherein the received data includes product configuration data; process the received data to
view more
|
Enforceable and Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 373 Entry 344 Entry 286 |
20 |
The computer program product of claim 19 further comprising code encoded in said computer program product to cause the computer system to: receive comparison criteria data from the first computer system, wherein the comparison criteria data specifies
view more
|
Enforceable and Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 373 Entry 344 Entry 286 |
22 |
The computer program product of claim 19, wherein said first product configuration is a first vehicle and said second product configuration is a second vehicle.
|
Enforceable and Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 373 Entry 344 Entry 286 |
23 |
The computer program product of claim 19 further comprising code encoded in said computer program product to cause the computer system to: aselect said first product configuration from at least one stored product configuration.
|
Enforceable and Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 373 Entry 344 Entry 286 |
-
Infringement
Internet Brands, Inc.
- 1 Detail
Accused Product | Patent # | Claim # | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
Method and apparatus for product comparison | US 7,130,821 B1 |
1, 10, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23
|
No infringement
Entry 373Entry 344 |