2:10-cv-02493 | GAMMINO v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION et al

GAMMINO v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION et al DC CAFC
- 2:10-cv-02493
- E.D. Pa.
- Judge: Cynthia M. Rufe
- Filed: 05/20/2010
- Closed: 08/15/2014
- Latest Docket Entry: 08/31/2015
- PACER
- Docket updated daily

Plaintiff

Defendants

Accused Products

Patents-in-Suit

1,549

Days in Litigation

Overview

Docket (198 Entries)

Campaign

Outcome

GAMMINO v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION et al DC CAFC
- 2:10-cv-02493
- E.D. Pa.
- Judge: Cynthia M. Rufe
- Filed: 05/20/2010
- Closed: 08/15/2014
- Latest Docket Entry: 08/31/2015
- PACER
- Docket updated daily

Overview

Docket (198 Entries)

Campaign

Outcome

View Complaint

Appeals

13-1636
14-1016

Causes of Action

Infringement

Willful Patent Infringement

Market Sector

Mobile Communications and Devices

Court

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Assigned Judge

Cynthia M. Rufe

Outcome Summary

View Outcome Details

Overview

Validity and Enforceability Details

Infringement Details

Patent Information

Patents-in-Suit

Validity & Enforceability

US 5,809,125 A

3 Details

Claim #	Claim Text	Outcome
3	Telecommunications apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said means for evaluating said third plurality of dialing signals includes means for evaluating said first plurality of dialing signals and for preventing establishment of said telephone call if said evaluated first plurality of dialing signals are determined to be further respective predetermined signals. view more	Invalid Entry 100
17	Telecommunications apparatus according to claim 15, wherein said means for evaluating said plurality of second signal values further includes means for evaluating said first signal value and for preventing establishment of said telephone call if said first signal value at a predetermined location in said sequence is determined to be a predetermined signal value. view more	Invalid Entry 100
31	A method of controlling the operation of a telecommunications device according to claim 29, wherein step (b) further includes the step of evaluating said first plurality of dialing signals and step (c) includes the step of at least partially preventing operation of said telecommunications device if said evaluated first plurality of dialing signals are determined to be a further respectively predetermined digit sequence. view more	Invalid Entry 100

US 5,812,650 A

2 Details

Claim #	Claim Text	Outcome
2	Telecommunications apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said means for evaluating said third plurality of dialing signals includes means for evaluating said first plurality of dialing signals and for preventing said telecommunications switch from establishing said telephone call if said evaluated third plurality of dialing signals are determined to be respective predetermined signals which are used for international dialing and if said evaluated first plurality of dialing signals are determined to be further respective predetermined signals. view more	Invalid Entry 100
4	A method of controlling the operation of a telecommunications switch according to claim 3, wherein step (b) includes the step of evaluating said first plurality of digits and step (c) includes the step of preventing said telecommunications switch from establishing said telephone call if said third plurality of digits are determined to be said respectively predetermined digit sequence which is used for international dialing and said first plurality of digits are determined to be a further respectively predetermined digit sequence. view more	Invalid Entry 100

Infringement

Sprint Communications Company LP

3 Details

Accused Product	Patent #	Claim #	Outcome
Business Exchange linesCell phonesCellular phone networkingCentrex linesMobile Telephone Switching OfficesNetwork switchesPayphonesPBX lines	US 5,359,643 A	All Asserted Claims	No infringement Entry 161
Business Exchange linesCell phonesCellular phone networkingCentrex linesMobile Telephone Switching OfficesNetwork switchesPayphonesPBX lines	US 5,809,125 A	All Asserted Claims	No infringement Entry 161
Business Exchange linesCell phonesCellular phone networkingCentrex linesMobile Telephone Switching OfficesNetwork switchesPayphonesPBX lines	US 5,812,650 A	All Asserted Claims	No infringement Entry 161

Sprint Spectrum LP

3 Details

Accused Product	Patent #	Claim #	Outcome
Business Exchange linesCell phonesCellular phone networkingCentrex linesMobile Telephone Switching OfficesNetwork switchesPayphonesPBX lines	US 5,359,643 A	All Asserted Claims	No infringement Entry 161
Business Exchange linesCell phonesCellular phone networkingCentrex linesMobile Telephone Switching OfficesNetwork switchesPayphonesPBX lines	US 5,809,125 A	All Asserted Claims	No infringement Entry 161
Business Exchange linesCell phonesCellular phone networkingCentrex linesMobile Telephone Switching OfficesNetwork switchesPayphonesPBX lines	US 5,812,650 A	All Asserted Claims	No infringement Entry 161

Virgin Mobile USA LP

3 Details

Accused Product	Patent #	Claim #	Outcome
Business Exchange linesCell phonesCellular phone networkingCentrex linesMobile Telephone Switching OfficesNetwork switchesPayphonesPBX lines	US 5,359,643 A	All Asserted Claims	No infringement Entry 161
Business Exchange linesCell phonesCellular phone networkingCentrex linesMobile Telephone Switching OfficesNetwork switchesPayphonesPBX lines	US 5,809,125 A	All Asserted Claims	No infringement Entry 161
Business Exchange linesCell phonesCellular phone networkingCentrex linesMobile Telephone Switching OfficesNetwork switchesPayphonesPBX lines	US 5,812,650 A	All Asserted Claims	No infringement Entry 161

GAMMINO v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION et al DC CAFC

GAMMINO v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION et al DC CAFC

Outcome Summary

Validity & Enforceability

Infringement

Use Cases

Quick Links

Others

GAMMINO v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION et al DC CAFC

GAMMINO v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION et al DC CAFC

Outcome Summary

Subscription Required

Subscription Required

Subscription Required

Subscription Required

Validity & Enforceability

Infringement

Use Cases

Quick Links

Others