-
Sanofi et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. et al DC CAFC
- 1:14-cv-00264
- D. Del.
- Judge: Richard G. Andrews
- Filed: 02/26/2014
- Closed: 09/22/2016
- Latest Docket Entry: 12/07/2018
- PACER
2
Plaintiffs
12
Defendants
0
Accused
Products
3
Patents-in-Suit
940
Days in
Litigation
-
Sanofi et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. et al DC CAFC
- 1:14-cv-00264
- D. Del.
- Judge: Richard G. Andrews
- Filed: 02/26/2014
- Closed: 09/22/2016
- Latest Docket Entry: 12/07/2018
- PACER
Market Sector
Biotech and Pharma
Court
Assigned Judge
Outcome Summary
Patent Information
-
Validity & Enforceability
Claim # | Claim Text | Outcome |
---|---|---|
1 |
A method of decreasing a risk of cardiovascular hospitalization in a patient, said method comprising administering to said patient an effective amount of dronedarone or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, twice a day with a morning and an
view more
|
Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 336 |
2 |
The method according to claim 1, wherein said cardiovascular hospitalization is hospitalization for atrial fibrillation.
|
Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 336 |
3 |
The method according to claim 1, wherein the administration of dronedarone or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof prevents cardiovascular hospitalization.
|
Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 336 |
4 |
The method according to claim 1, wherein said patient further receives a diuretic-based treatment.
|
Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 336 |
5 |
The method according to claim 4, wherein said diuretic is a non-potassium-sparing diuretic.
|
Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 336 |
6 |
The method according to claim 1, wherein the dose of dronedarone administered per day, orally, is less than or equal 800 mg, measured in base form.
|
Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 336 |
8 |
A method of decreasing a risk of hospitalization for atrial fibrillation in a patient having a history of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, said method comprising administering dronedarone, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, twice a
view more
|
Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 336 |
9 |
The method according to claim 1, wherein the severe heart failure is indicated by NYHA Class IV heart failure.
|
Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 336 |
10 |
The method of claim 1, wherein the administration of said effective amount is maintained for at least 12 months.
|
Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 336 |
11 |
The method of claim 1, wherein the administration of said effective amount of dronedarone or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is maintained to decrease the risk of cardiovascular hospitalization.
|
Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 336 |
12 |
The method according to claim 1, wherein said patient has a history of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter.
|
Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 336 |
13 |
The method of claim 8, wherein the dose of dronedarone administered per day, orally, is less than or equal 800 mg, measured in base form.
|
Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 336 |
16 |
The method of claim 8, wherein the severe heart failure is indicated by NYHA Class IV heart failure.
|
Invalid (102 and 103)
Entry 336 |
All Claims |
NA
|
Valid (103)
Entry 332 |
-
Infringement
Sandoz Inc.
- 2 Details
Accused Product | Patent # | Claim # | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
Dronedarone hydrochloride product | US 8,318,800 B2 |
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
|
Infringement
Entry 336
|
Dronedarone hydrochloride productgeneric dronedarone product | US 8,410,167 B2 |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16
|
Infringement
Entry 336Entry 332 |
Watson Laboratories, Inc. (Connecticut)
- 2 Details
Accused Product | Patent # | Claim # | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
Dronedarone hydrochloride product | US 8,318,800 B2 |
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
|
Infringement
Entry 336
|
Dronedarone hydrochloride productgeneric dronedarone product | US 8,410,167 B2 |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16
|
Infringement
Entry 336Entry 332 |