-
Versata Software, Inc. et al v. SAP America, Inc. et al DC CAFC
- 2:07-cv-00153
- E.D. Tex.
- Filed: 04/20/2007
- Closed: 01/21/2014
- Latest Docket Entry: 04/27/2015
- Judge: Roy S. Payne
- PACER
3
Plaintiffs
2
Defendants
1
Accused
Product
5
Patents-in-Suit
2,469
Days in
Litigation
-
Versata Software, Inc. et al v. SAP America, Inc. et al DC CAFC
- 2:07-cv-00153
- E.D. Tex.
- Filed: 04/20/2007
- Closed: 01/21/2014
- Latest Docket Entry: 04/27/2015
- Judge: Roy S. Payne
- PACER
Market Sector
E-commerce and Software
Assigned Judge
Outcome Summary
Patent Information
-
Validity & Enforceability
Claim # | Claim Text | Outcome |
---|---|---|
26 |
A computer readable storage media comprising: computer instructions to implement the method of claim 17.
|
Valid (112)
Entry 318 |
28 |
A computer readable storage media comprising: computer instructions to implement the method of claim 27.
|
Valid (112)
Entry 318 |
29 |
An apparatus for determining a price of a product offered to a purchasing organization comprising:</claim-text> a processor; a memory coupled to the processor, wherein the memory includes computer program instructions capable of: retrieving from a
view more
|
Valid (112)
Entry 318 |
Claim # | Claim Text | Outcome |
---|---|---|
31 |
An article of manufacture comprising: a computer usable medium having computer readable program code embodied therein for determining a price of a product offered to a purchasing organization, said computer readable program code in said article
view more
|
Valid (112)
Entry 318 |
35 |
The article of manufacture of claim 33 wherein said pricing adjustments are sorted and applied according to said hierarchy of product groups.
|
Valid (112)
Entry 318 |
36 |
The article of manufacture of claim 33 wherein said pricing adjustments are sorted and applied according to said hierarchy of organizational groups.
|
Valid (112)
Entry 318 |
-
Infringement
SAP America
- 5 Details
Accused Product | Patent # | Claim # | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
4.6C47x10047x200CRM versions 3.0, 3.1, 4.0, 5.0 2007 (6.0))ERP versions 2004, 2005R/3 version 4.6B | US 5,708,798 A |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
|
No infringement
Entry 243
|
Business suite | US 5,878,400 A |
31, 35, 36
|
Infringement
Entry 318
|
4.6C47x10047x200CRM versions 3.0, 3.1, 4.0, 5.0 2007 (6.0))ERP versions 2004, 2005R/3 version 4.6B | US 6,002,854 A |
1, 2, 4, 5, 10, 11, 12, 14, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51
|
No infringement
Entry 243
|
Business suite | US 6,553,350 B2 |
26, 28, 29
|
Infringement
Entry 318Entry 515 |
SRM 2007(6.0)SRM 3.0SRM 4.0SRM 5.0SRM 7.0 | US 7,069,235 B1 |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27
|
No infringement
Entry 266
|
SAP SE
- 5 Details
Accused Product | Patent # | Claim # | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
4.6C47x10047x200CRM versions 3.0, 3.1, 4.0, 5.0 2007 (6.0))ERP versions 2004, 2005R/3 version 4.6B | US 5,708,798 A |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
|
No infringement
Entry 243
|
Business suite | US 5,878,400 A |
31, 35, 36
|
Infringement
Entry 318
|
4.6C47x10047x200CRM versions 3.0, 3.1, 4.0, 5.0 2007 (6.0))ERP versions 2004, 2005R/3 version 4.6B | US 6,002,854 A |
1, 2, 4, 5, 10, 11, 12, 14, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51
|
No infringement
Entry 243
|
Business suite | US 6,553,350 B2 |
26, 28, 29
|
Infringement
Entry 318Entry 515 |
SRM 2007(6.0)SRM 3.0SRM 4.0SRM 5.0SRM 7.0 | US 7,069,235 B1 |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27
|
No infringement
Entry 266
|
-
Damages
Total Damages:
$328,654,806.00Other Costs:
$63,278,303.33Dockets:
- Compensatory Damages: $328,654,806.00
- Court Costs: $221,073.33
- Pre Judgment Interest: $63,057,230.00