-
Adaptix, Inc. v. Cellco Partnership et al NPE DC CAFC
- 6:12-cv-00120
- E.D. Tex.
- Judge: Robert W. Schroeder III
+1
- Filed: 03/09/2012
- Closed: 09/29/2015
- Latest Docket Entry: 08/11/2016
- PACER
1
Plaintiff
3
Defendants
2
Accused
Products
2
Patents-in-Suit
1,356
Days in
Litigation
-
Adaptix, Inc. v. Cellco Partnership et al NPE DC CAFC
- 6:12-cv-00120
- E.D. Tex.
- Judge: Robert W. Schroeder III
+1
- Filed: 03/09/2012
- Closed: 09/29/2015
- Latest Docket Entry: 08/11/2016
- PACER
Market Sector
Mobile Communications and Devices
Referred Judge
Assigned Judge
Outcome Summary
Patent Information
-
Validity & Enforceability
Claim # | Claim Text | Outcome |
---|---|---|
2 |
The method defined in claim 1 further comprising the subscriber unit sending the indication to the base station.
|
Invalid (112)
Entry 188 |
3 |
The method defined in claim 2 further comprising sending an indication of the set of subcarriers selected by the base station for use by the subscriber unit.
|
Invalid (112)
Entry 188 |
4 |
The method defined in claim 3 further comprising the base station selecting subcarriers for the subscriber unit based on inter-cell interference avoidance.
|
Invalid (112)
Entry 188 |
9 |
The method defined in claim 8 wherein the additional information comprises traffic load information on each cluster of subcarriers.
|
Valid (112)
Entry 280 |
10 |
The method defined in claim 9 wherein the traffic load information is provided by a data buffer in the base station.
|
Valid (112)
Entry 280 |
Claim # | Claim Text | Outcome |
---|---|---|
8 |
A method for subcarrier selection for a system employing orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) comprising: a subscriber measuring channel and interference information for a plurality of subcarriers based on pilot symbols received from
view more
|
Valid (112)
Entry 280 |
9 |
The method defined in claim 8 wherein the indication of coding and modulation rates comprises an SINR index indicative of a coding and modulation rate.
|
Valid (112)
Entry 280 |
-
Infringement
Cellco Partnership, Inc.
- 2 Details
Accused Product | Patent # | Claim # | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
LTE devices | US 6,947,748 B2 | All Asserted Claims |
No infringement
Entry 369
|
LTE devices | US 7,454,212 B2 | All Asserted Claims |
No infringement
Entry 369
|
LG Electronics, Inc.
- 2 Details
Accused Product | Patent # | Claim # | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
LTE devices | US 6,947,748 B2 | All Asserted Claims |
No infringement
Entry 369
|
LTE devices | US 7,454,212 B2 | All Asserted Claims |
No infringement
Entry 369
|
LG Electronics USA Incorporated
- 2 Details
Accused Product | Patent # | Claim # | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
LTE devices | US 6,947,748 B2 | All Asserted Claims |
No infringement
Entry 369
|
LTE devices | US 7,454,212 B2 | All Asserted Claims |
No infringement
Entry 369
|