New Case Against Reebok Raises Questions About Wider Set of “DynaIP Plaintiffs”
William P. Ramey, III of Ramey LLP has filed another “Certificate of Interested Parties” that purports to provide a “complete list of all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent or subsidiary corporations, or other legal entities that are financially interested in the outcome of” a case. The case is the new one filed by Etto IP LLC, its first, in which the plaintiff accuses Adidas (Reebok) (6:23-cv-00003) of infringing a single patent, generally related to designing a product with a “three dimensional” mold, through the provision of the Reebok 3D Technology for making shoes. Revelations surfacing through the “Series of Extraordinary Events” in Delaware, though, suggest the name of a person who—and another entity or two that—might also be “financially interested” in the outcome of the new case.
Subscription Required
This content requires a subscription to view
- Over 7,000 news articles covering new patent cases, key policy decisions, and USPTO assignments
- Advanced custom alerts for campaigns and entities
- Proprietary litigation timelines
- Full access to Federal Circuit, PTAB, and ITC dockets
- Judge, venue, and law firm analytics