LG Electronics/Innotek and Lexington Luminance Lock Horns Before the PTAB and in District Court
A February 2015 Federal Circuit opinion reversing a Massachusetts district court’s construction of several claim terms in the lone patent (6,936,851) brought the campaign of Lexington Luminance LLC back to life. Litigation resumed in separate cases brought against Amazon and Google, leading to recent dismissal in each case, and so far in 2016, the NPE has added cases against three more defendants: Samsung (2:16-cv-00169, filed in February 2016), TCL (1:16-cv-11458, filed in July 2016), and LG Electronics and LG Innotek (1:16-cv-12175, filed in October 2016). The ‘851 patent generally relates to improving the manufacture of light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Defendants’ mobile phones, tablet computers, televisions, and/or other electronic devices have been at issue throughout the campaign.
Subscription Required
This content requires a subscription to view
- Over 7,000 news articles covering new patent cases, key policy decisions, and USPTO assignments
- Advanced custom alerts for campaigns and entities
- Proprietary litigation timelines
- Full access to Federal Circuit, PTAB, and ITC dockets
- Judge, venue, and law firm analytics
Related News
Details
Key Parties
Campaigns
Litigations
- Lexington Luminance LLC v. Lighting Science Group Corporation
- Lexington Luminance LLC v. Osram Sylvania, Inc., et al
- Lexington Luminance LLC v. Feit Electric Company, Inc.
- Lexington Luminance LLC v. Amazon.com Inc. et al
- Lexington Luminance LLC v. Google, Inc.
- Formosa Epitaxy, Inc. v. Lexington Luminance LLC
- Lexington Luminance LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd; et al
- Lexington Luminance LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd; et al
- Lexington Luminance LLC v. TCL Multimedia Holdings Ltd. et al
- Lexington Luminance LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al