USB Charging Campaign Expands, Three Additional Patents Asserted Against Samsung
In its litigation campaign over former BlackBerry patents, Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC (FISI) has upped the number of defendants from three to four and the number of patents-at-issue from five to eight. FISI’s new complaint against Samsung (2:17-cv-00145) asserts all five patents (7,239,111; 7,834,586; 7,893,655; 8,232,766; 8,624,550) already in campaign as well as three patents (6,936,936; 7,791,319; 8,541,983) new to the litigation. Rights in all of the patents, which generally relate to charging the battery of a mobile device (most of them explicitly by using a USB connection to “fast charge” it) were received from BlackBerry as part of a November 2015 transaction involving over 50 patent assets. In its complaints, FISI characterizes itself as “responsible for protecting and licensing seminal BlackBerry innovations in the field of USB charging”, and the accused products are mobile, charging, and other devices that allegedly make such use of a USB connection.
Subscription Required
This content requires a subscription to view
- Over 7,000 news articles covering new patent cases, key policy decisions, and USPTO assignments
- Advanced custom alerts for campaigns and entities
- Proprietary litigation timelines
- Full access to Federal Circuit, PTAB, and ITC dockets
- Judge, venue, and law firm analytics
Market Sectors
Related News
Details
Key Parties
Campaigns
Litigations
- Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC v. Huawei Investment & Holding Co., Ltd. et al
- Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al
- Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC v. ZTE Corporation et al
- Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
- Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC v. ZTE Corporation et al
- Apple Inc. v. Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC et al
- Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC v. Apple, Inc.
- Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC v. Apple, Inc.