California Judge Declines to Grant Retrial in Finjan Suit Against Sophos
March 17, 2017
A California judge has declined to grant a new trial in Finjan, Inc.’s case against Sophos (3:14-cv-01197). In a ruling issued on March 14, District Judge William H. Orrick denied the company’s motion for a new trial as well as a motion for attorney fees filed by Finjan, ruling that the case was not exceptional under Octane.
Subscription Required
This content requires a subscription to view
- Over 7,000 news articles covering new patent cases, key policy decisions, and USPTO assignments
- Advanced custom alerts for campaigns and entities
- Proprietary litigation timelines
- Full access to Federal Circuit, PTAB, and ITC dockets
- Judge, venue, and law firm analytics
Related News
Details
Key Parties
Campaigns
Litigations
- Finjan Software Ltd. v. Secure Computing Corporation et al
- Finjan Inc. v. McAfee Inc. et al
- Finjan Software Ltd. v. Aladdin Knowledge Systems Inc. et al
- Finjan, Inc. v. Fireeye, Inc.
- Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat Systems, Inc.
- Finjan, Inc. v. Websense, Inc.
- Finjan, Inc. v. Proofpoint, Inc. et al
- Finjan, Inc. v. Sophos, Inc.
- Finjan, Inc. v. Websense, Inc
- Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec Corp.
