Implicit Asserts Newly Issued Family Member Against Ericsson, Huawei, and Trend Micro
In early 2016, inventor Edward Balassanian revived a prior campaign, litigated in California by earlier controlled subsidiary Implicit Networks, Inc., with new cases filed in Texas by a more recent controlled subsidiary Implicit, LLC. That campaign asserted five patents at the time (6,324,685; 8,694,683; 8,856,779; 9,270,790; 9,325,740), generally related to the dynamic download of applications based on analyzing user requests. The defendants in the Texas revival were Ericsson, Huawei, NEC, Nokia, and Trend Micro. On March 7, 2017, a sixth patent (9,591,104) issued, and, within three weeks, Implicit has filed new suits against Ericsson (6:17-cv-00181), Huawei (6:17-cv-00182), and Trend Micro (6:17-cv-00183) to assert the ‘104 patent. The accused products are those that act as network gateways and/or engage in deep packet inspection.
Subscription Required
This content requires a subscription to view
- Over 7,000 news articles covering new patent cases, key policy decisions, and USPTO assignments
- Advanced custom alerts for campaigns and entities
- Proprietary litigation timelines
- Full access to Federal Circuit, PTAB, and ITC dockets
- Judge, venue, and law firm analytics
Related News
Details
Key Parties
Campaigns
Litigations
- Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company
- Sun Microsystems Inc v. Implicit Networks Inc
- Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Sybase, Inc. et al
- Implicit Networks Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation et al
- Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Juniper Networks, Inc.
- Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc.
- Implicit Networks, Inc. v. VMWare, Inc. et al
- Implicit Networks Inc v. Advanced Micro Devices Inc et al
- Implicit Networks, Inc. v. F5 Networks, Inc.
- Implicit Networks Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation et al
