Fall Line Sticks with Texas, Where It Faces an Alice Challenge
This past April, Fall Line Patents, LLC, an NPE formed in Oklahoma in January, initiated its first litigation campaign, suing American Airlines, Cinemark Holdings, and GrubHub in the Eastern District of Texas. A couple of weeks after dismissal (with prejudice) in the GrubHub case, the NPE has added two more defendants in the same district, asserting the same patent (9,454,748) against Choice Hotels (6:17-cv-00407) and Uber (6:17-cv-00408). The ‘748 patent generally relates to managing user-provided data based on the user’s location, and mobile apps that transmit location-specific information are the accused products. Fall Line alleges proper venue over each defendant (formed in Delaware) based on the presence of several Choice Hotel properties in the district and based on Uber’s “providing its ride-sharing service in this district” and purportedly maintaining “a regular and established place of business” in Plano.
This content requires a subscription to view
- Over 7,000 news articles covering new patent cases, key policy decisions, and USPTO assignments
- Advanced custom alerts for campaigns and entities
- Proprietary litigation timelines
- Full access to Federal Circuit, PTAB, and ITC dockets
- Judge, venue, and law firm analytics
- Fall Line Patents, LLC v. American Airlines Group Inc. et al
- Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Cinemark Holdings, Inc. et al
- Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Grubhub Holdings, Inc. et al
- Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
- Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Choice Hotels International, Inc.
- Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Pizza Hut, LLC et al
- Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Zoe's Kitchen, Inc. et al
- Fall Line Patents, LLC v. AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. et al
- Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Boston Market Corporation
- Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.