ChriMar Files More Suits in Texas as Cisco, HP, and HP Enterprise Seek Declaratory Judgments in Michigan
ChriMar Systems, Inc. and ChriMar Holding Company, LLC (collectively, “ChriMar”) have filed two more Eastern District of Texas cases in their Power-over-Ethernet (PoE) campaign, one each against Johnson Controls (6:17-cv-00654) and Watchnet (6:17-cv-00657). The new complaints assert different subsets of ChriMar’s portfolio, targeting “PoE powered devices”, primarily networked cameras, that practice PoE standards. The newest patent to issue to ChriMar is asserted in both suits, and, as has become the practice each time ChriMar has asserted earlier, related patents throughout the campaign, HP and HP Enterprise (Aruba Networks) (2:17-cv-13784) and Cisco (2:17-cv-13770) have filed actions in the Eastern District of Michigan seeking declaratory judgments of noninfringement and unenforceability of the newly issued patent.
Subscription Required
This content requires a subscription to view
- Over 7,000 news articles covering new patent cases, key policy decisions, and USPTO assignments
- Advanced custom alerts for campaigns and entities
- Proprietary litigation timelines
- Full access to Federal Circuit, PTAB, and ITC dockets
- Judge, venue, and law firm analytics
Related News
Details
Key Parties
Campaigns
Litigations
- Chrimar Systems, Inc. v Garrettcom, Inc., et al
- Chrimar Systems, Inc. v Garrettcom, Inc., et al
- ChriMar Systems Inc v. KTI Network, Inc. et al
- Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Waters Network Systems, LLC
- Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Danpex Corporation
- ChriMar Systems Inc. et al v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al
- ChriMar Systems Inc. et al v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al
- Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD., et al
- Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al v. Grandstream Networks, Inc.
- Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al v. Aastra Technologies Limited et al
