Implicit Files New Texas Cases After Defeating Motion to Transfer Earlier Suit to California
Implicit, LLC has filed a new Eastern District of Texas campaign on the heels of District Judge Rodney Gilstrap’s refusal to transfer an earlier case against Palo Alto Networks to California. The latest defendants are McAfee (2:18-cv-00046) and Sophos (2:18-cv-00047), each accused of infringing three patents, characterized by the court as Implicit’s “Demultiplexing Patents” and generally related to “technology for computer message exchange processing and more specifically to technology for dynamically converting the form of the messages as the messages are being exchanged”. The accused products are “McAfee’s security information and event management products that include McAfee Application Data Monitor functionality” and the Sophos XG Firewall, respectively.
Subscription Required
This content requires a subscription to view
- Over 7,000 news articles covering new patent cases, key policy decisions, and USPTO assignments
- Advanced custom alerts for campaigns and entities
- Proprietary litigation timelines
- Full access to Federal Circuit, PTAB, and ITC dockets
- Judge, venue, and law firm analytics
Market Sector
Related News
Details
Key Parties
Campaigns
Litigations
- Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company
- Sun Microsystems Inc v. Implicit Networks Inc
- Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Sybase, Inc. et al
- Implicit Networks Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation et al
- Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Juniper Networks, Inc.
- Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc.
- Implicit Networks, Inc. v. VMWare, Inc. et al
- Implicit Networks Inc v. Advanced Micro Devices Inc et al
- Implicit Networks, Inc. v. F5 Networks, Inc.
- Implicit Networks Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation et al
