In opposition to a motion for sanctions filed by a named inventor who now claims that a plaintiff that has been suing over a patent family since June 2020 never actually owned those patents, Carlos O. Gorrichategui, the apparent principal for a whole stable of Ramey-repped plaintiffs, has submitted another question-raising declaration. In it, Gorrichategui suggests that payments from past monetization efforts have been made to that inventor and/or to a controlled company, neither of which was ever disclosed as a party with a financial interest in the outcome of the plaintiff’s cases. This omission further suggests that this additional pattern and practice at Ramey LLP might be problematic.