Gilstrap Refuses to Rule That PanOptis Met US FRAND Obligations in Huawei Suit but Awards Enhanced Damages
In September 2017, three subsidiaries of PanOptis Holdings, LLC—Optis Cellular Technology LLC; Optis Wireless Technology, LLC; and PanOptis Patent Management, LLC (collectively, PanOptis)—sued Huawei over a fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory (FRAND) patent licensing dispute, in part seeking a declaratory judgment that the NPE had complied with its FRAND obligations by offering certain global licensing terms to its international patent portfolio. However, the following August, District Judge Rodney Gilstrap ruled that PanOptis could only seek such a judgment for its US patents, shortly before the entry of a $10.6M willful infringement verdict later that month. Judge Gilstrap has now denied the NPE’s request for declaratory judgment, holding that the record lacked any evidence that would allow the court to rule on a US-only FRAND license. In the resulting final judgment, Judge Gilstrap awarded PanOptis $2.6M in enhanced damages, also imposing additional royalties based on a percentage of sales revenues for the accused products. These rulings come just over a month after the NPE’s acquisition by private equity firm Brevet Capital.
Subscription Required
This content requires a subscription to view
- Over 7,000 news articles covering new patent cases, key policy decisions, and USPTO assignments
- Advanced custom alerts for campaigns and entities
- Proprietary litigation timelines
- Full access to Federal Circuit, PTAB, and ITC dockets
- Judge, venue, and law firm analytics
Market Sector
Related News
Details
Key Parties
Campaigns
Litigations
- Optis Wireless Technology, LLC et al v. ZTE Corporation et al
- PanOptis Patent Management, LLC et al v. ZTE Corporation et al
- PanOptis Patent Management, LLC et al v. BlackBerry Limited et al
- PanOptis Patent Management, LLC et al v. Kyocera Communications, Inc. et al
- PanOptis Patent Management, LLC et al v. BlackBerry Corporation et al
- PanOptis Patent Management, LLC et al v. Kyocera Communications Inc. et al
- Optis Wireless Technology, LLC et al v. Huawei Device (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd
- Optis Wireless Technology, LLC et al v. Apple Inc.