Alice Ruling Ends VoIP-Pal.com Cases Against Apple, AT&T, Twitter, Verizon
The sole litigation campaign of VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. has hit another snag. District Judge Lucy H. Koh has ended the Northern District of California cases that the publicly traded NPE filed against Apple, AT&T, Twitter, and Verizon with a March 25, 2019 order invalidating the asserted claims of both patents-in-suit under Alice. Judge Koh characterized the patents as generally related to “the process of routing calls (either voice or video) between a caller and a callee, in which calls are classified as either public network calls or private network calls”, adopting the parties’ division of the asserted claims into “multi-network claims” and “single network claims” before choosing a representative claim for each category. Her order culminates in the invalidation of both the “multi-network” and “single network” claims as patent-ineligibly drawn to the abstract idea of “routing a call based on characteristics of the caller and callee”.
Subscription Required
This content requires a subscription to view
- Over 7,000 news articles covering new patent cases, key policy decisions, and USPTO assignments
- Advanced custom alerts for campaigns and entities
- Proprietary litigation timelines
- Full access to Federal Circuit, PTAB, and ITC dockets
- Judge, venue, and law firm analytics
Related News
Details
Key Parties
Campaigns
Litigations
- Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
- Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Verizon Wireless Services, LLC et al
- Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc.
- Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
- Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
- Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc.
- Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Verizon Wireless Services, LLC et al
- Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. AT&T Corp.
- Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
- Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.