One Rembrandt Affiliate Adds More Bluetooth Cases While Another Still Faces a Large Attorney Fees Award
Eight months after a settlement ended years-long litigation against Samsung in the Eastern District of Texas, and three months after suing Apple in that same district, Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP (Rembrandt WT) has filed a pair of Central District of California lawsuits, one each against Broadcom (8:19-cv-00708) and Qualcomm (8:19-cv-00705). Both companies are accused of infringing two wireless communications patents through the provision of various semiconductor products that implement Bluetooth—from single-chip Bluetooth products to full systems-on-chip—and that allegedly support various versions of the Bluetooth Enhanced Data Rate (EDR) specification, including “Version 2.0 + EDR, Version 2.1 + EDR, Version 3.0 + HS, Version 4.0 + LE, Version 4.1, Version 4.2, or version 5”. Meanwhile, Rembrandt affiliates and the remaining defendants in a separate campaign have submitted competing approaches in Delaware for dealing with a Federal Circuit remand of a $51M attorney fees award against the NPEs.
Subscription Required
This content requires a subscription to view
- Over 7,000 news articles covering new patent cases, key policy decisions, and USPTO assignments
- Advanced custom alerts for campaigns and entities
- Proprietary litigation timelines
- Full access to Federal Circuit, PTAB, and ITC dockets
- Judge, venue, and law firm analytics
Market Sectors
Related News
Details
Key Parties
Campaigns
Litigations
- Rembrandt Technologies LP v. Fox Television Stations Inc. et al
- Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Comcast Corporation et al
- Rembrandt Technologies LP v. Charter Communications Inc. et al
- Rembrandt Technologies LP v. Time Warner Cable Inc. et al
- Coxcom Inc. v. Rembrandt Technologies LP
- Rembrandt Technologies LP v. NBC Universal Inc.
- Rembrandt Technologies LP v. Comcast Corporation et al
- Rembrandt Technologies LP v. Time Warner Cable Inc.
- Rembrandt Technologies LP v. Charter Communications Inc. et al
- Rembrandt Technologies LP v. Fox Entertainment Group Inc. et al
