MOSAID Technologies Inc. has followed up its pair of 2025 complaints against Infineon Technologies with a new case filed against Intel (1:25-cv-00677) in the Western District of Texas. Against Intel, MOSAID asserts ten former TSMC patents and one former Panasonic patent, targeting the provision of various semiconductor devices (i.e., chipsets, FPGAs, GPUs, processors, and server products) with “active circuitry made using Intel FinFET Low Power (‘22FFL’), Intel 16, Intel 10 nm, Intel 7, Intel 4, and Intel 3 process nodes”, as well as devices (e.g., desktop computers and laptops) that incorporate such products—including those manufactured by entities identified as its “Authorized Distributors”, such as Dell.

Earlier this month, publicly traded Quest Patent Research Corporation (QPRC) purchased more than 2,500 US patents, as well as foreign counterparts and applications, for $9M from Monterey Research, LLC. The subsidiary receiving those assets, MR Licensing LLC, has filed its first suit, in which it accuses DENSO and Renesas Electronics (2:25-cv-00441) of infringing eight of the patents through the provision of a long list of accused products. QPRC’s recent SEC filing describes the portfolio as related to “storage device security and semiconductor circuitry”, indicating that the financing for the deal includes “up to $7,500,000 for patent enforcement costs, including legal fees subject to budget limitation to be agreed upon”. Monterey Research sued the same two defendants over four of the patents appearing in MR Licensing’s new complaint last year; word on the docket of that case concerning this change of ownership has yet to appear, beyond entries of appearance by MR Licensing counsel Fabricant LLP.

Hamilcar Barca IP LLC is a Longhorn IP LLC entity holding a portfolio of former MediaTek patents. It has now filed its first affirmative lawsuit, accusing NVIDIA (1:25-cv-00620) in a new Western District of Texas complaint of infringing two of them, one described as directed to “processing noise interference according to an error feedback mechanism of a Serial Advanced Technology Attachment (‘SATA’)”; the other, to computing systems operating in multiple security environments. The respective accused products are “any device or system implementing SATAv3 or later, including but not limited to the NVIDIA SN2000 switch and NVIDIA DGX Systems” and “the ARMv8-A-compliant data or central processing units, and other systems and devices made, imported, or sold by NVIDIA supporting the ARMv8-A or later architecture”.

MYW Semitech LLC has filed its inaugural litigation, accusing Apple (1:25-cv-00504) in a new District of Delaware complaint of infringing three high-density multichip packing patents. The Delaware plaintiff targets the alleged use of integrated fanout package-on-package (InFO PoP) technology in certain of its mobile chips, including the A10 Fusion, A10X Fusion, A11 Bionic, A12 Bionic, A12X Bionic, A12Z Bionic, A13 Bionic, A14 Bionic, A15 Bionic, A16 Bionic, A17 Pro, as well as the S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, and S9.

Last December, RPX noted the November 2024 transfer of roughly 100 US patents from AMD, via subsidiary ATI Technologies, to Onesta IP LLC. The recipient has now launched litigation over a subset of those assets, both in district court and before the International Trade Commission (ITC). In one Western District of Texas complaint, Onesta IP accuses Qualcomm, Nothing, and OnePlus (1:25-cv-00587) of infringing five patents, Qualcomm via provision of certain Snapdragon-series processors, with Nothing and OnePlus targeted over smartphones that incorporate the accused processors. In another, Onesta IP accuses NVIDIA (1:25-cv-00586) of infringing four of those patents plus a fifth, through the provision of certain “integrated circuits, circuit board assemblies, graphics cards, and computers”. The ITC complaint (337-TA-3823) names all four district court defendants as proposed respondents, with all six patents asserted there.

Redstone Logics, LLC has filed Western District of Texas cases against AMD (7:25-cv-00182), Apple (7:25-cv-00183), and NVIDIA (7:25-cv-00184). There, separate 2024 suits against MediaTek, NXP Semiconductors, and Qualcomm were transferred in February 2025 by agreement from District Judge David Counts to District Judge Alan D. Albright. The cases concern a single multicore processing patent, a claim construction order concerning which was handed down by Magistrate Judge Derek T. Gilliland just before transfer. This past week, Redstone and MediaTek noticed a resolution of their dispute.

In a new Western District of Texas complaint, K.Mizra LLC has sued Broadcom (7:25-cv-00164) over the provision of devices (i.e., chipsets and Systems-on-Chip (SoCs)) that support Wi-Fi 5, 6, and/or 7. Asserted are two wireless communications patents, issuing to Intel but received by the plaintiff in a July 2024 assignment from Daedalus Prime LLC. The plaintiff alleges that it provided notice of infringement of the patents-in-suit to Broadcom and related entities and individuals on “multiple occasions” prior to the lawsuit but received no response.

EireOg Innovations Limited, an Atlantic IP Services Limited plaintiff, has sued Amazon (Amazon Web Services (AWS)) (1:25-cv-00552) in the Western District of Texas where the same plaintiff has active cases against Dell, HP, and Oracle. Those suits, each filed in the first half of 2024, have all pushed into claim construction, having recently been assigned to District Judge Alan D. Albright. A separate wing of this campaign is underway before Eastern District of Texas Judge Rodney Gilstrap, against Acer, Cisco, Fortinet, HP Enterprise (HPE), IBM, Lenovo, and Palo Alto Networks. There, the Federal Circuit recently dismissed a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Lenovo, the appeals court refusing to reverse a denial of Lenovo’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Across this campaign, EireOg asserts up to five former NXP patents, targeting devices alleged to incorporate certain Intel and/or AMD CPUs.

Western District of Texas Judge Alan D. Albright has denied competing motions for summary judgment over Intel’s license defense based on Fortress Investment Group LLC’s 2020 acquisition of Finjan, Inc. Per the short order, “The matters presented before the Court are complex and ought to be resolved on a full plenary trial record, to assure a just result and facilitate appellate review”. The order comes after Judge Albright held a hearing over the motions earlier this month and after plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC filed a motion for leave to submit supplemental briefing regarding “new fact arguments”, one of which is that, per Intel, Fortress adopted the settlement agreement with Finjan through its acquisition “due diligence”.

Last month, RPX noted the transfer of a pair of US patents from Meizu Technology Co. Ltd. to Hypercore Systems LLC, an entity created in Texas in December 2024. Now, Hypercore has filed suit, accusing LG Electronics (LGE) (2:25-cv-00382) in a new Eastern District of Texas complaint of infringing both received assets, one through the provision of “at least the LG OLED G4, LG OLED C4, and LG OLED B4 televisions, among other substantially similar products” and the other, through the provision of “at least the LG Gram Book 15U50T-G.ARS2U1 laptop, and LG OLED G4, LG OLED C4, and LG OLED B4 televisions, among other substantially similar products”.