Methods and apparatus for a conducted electrical weapon

• US 10,015,871 B2
• Filed: 04/05/2016
• Issued: 07/03/2018
• Est. Priority Date: 02/23/2016
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Axon Enterprise, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Taser International Incorporated
• Inventors: Handel, Stephen D., Brundula, Steven N. D., Nerheim, Magne H.
• Primary Examiner(s): Bauer, Scott
• Application Number:
  US15/090,872
• Publication Number:
  US 20170245355A1
• Time in Patent Office: 819 Days
• CPC Class Codes: F41H 13/0025 for remote electrical discharge via conducting wires, e.g. via wire-tethered electrodes shot at a target
• CPC Class Codes: H01T 23/00 Apparatus for generating ions to be introduced into non-enclosed gases, e.g. into the atmosphere
• CPC Class Codes: H05C 3/00 Other circuits or apparatus

Abstract

A conducted electrical weapon (“CEW”) launches wire-tethered electrodes to provide a current through a human or animal target to impede locomotion of the target. The current may ionize air in a gap. A gap may occur between terminals at a face of the CEW and/or between the electrodes positioned near target tissue. A CEW may include a detector to detect ionization of air in a gap. A CEW may use information related to detecting ionization to determine a location where the ionization occurred. Information regarding location of ionization may be used to determine whether the current was delivered through the target via the electrodes.

Claims

1. A conducted electrical weapon (“

CEW”

) for providing a current through a human or animal target to impede locomotion of the target, the CEW comprising;

a processing circuit;

a detector;

at least two wire-tethered electrodes for launching toward the target to provide the current through the target to impede locomotion of the target;

wherein;

the detector detects a sound of ionization of air in a gap, the current ionizes the air in the gap; and

responsive to detecting, the processing circuit determines whether the current was delivered through the target via the electrodes.

2. The CEW of claim 1 wherein the processing circuit determines a magnitude of the sound of ionization to determine whether the current was delivered through the target via the electrodes.

3. The CEW of claim 2 wherein:

the CEW further comprises at least two terminals on a face of the CEW; and

if the magnitude of the sound is greater than a threshold, the processing circuit determines that the ionization occurred between the terminals whereby the current was not delivered through the target via the electrodes.

4. The CEW of claim 1 wherein the processing circuit determines a lapse of time from initiating a delivery of the current to the sound of ionization to determine whether the current was delivered through the target via the electrodes.

5. The CEW of claim 4 wherein:

the CEW further comprises at least two terminals on a face of the CEW; and

if a magnitude of the lapse of time is less than a threshold, the processing circuit determines that the ionization occurred between the terminals whereby the current was not delivered through the target via the electrodes.

6. A conducted electrical weapon (“

CEW”

) for providing a current through a human or animal target to impede locomotion of the target, the CEW comprising;

a processing circuit;

a detector;

at least two wire-tethered electrodes for launching toward the target to provide the current through the target to impede locomotion of the target;

wherein;

the processing circuit initiates launch of the electrodes toward the target;

the processing circuit initiates delivery of the current;

the detector detects a sound of ionization of air in a gap, the current ionizes the air in the gap;

the detector provides a notice responsive to detecting the sound of ionization; and

the processing circuit determines a lapse of time from initiating delivery of the current and the notice.

7. The CEW of claim 6 wherein the processing circuit further determines a magnitude of the sound of ionization.

8. The CEW of claim 6 wherein the processing circuit in accordance with the lapse of time determines a location from a face of the CEW of the sound of ionization.

9. The CEW of claim 6 wherein the processing circuit compares a magnitude of the lapse of time to a threshold time.

10. The CEW of claim 6 further comprising at least two terminals positioned on a forward portion of the CEW, wherein responsive to comparing, the processing circuit determines whether the ionization of air occurred in a gap of air between the at least two terminals.

11. The CEW of claim 9 wherein if the lapse of time is less than or equal to the threshold time, the ionization occurred in the gap of air between the at least two terminals.

12. The CEW of claim 9 wherein if the lapse of time is greater than or equal to the threshold time, the ionization did not occur in the gap of air between the at least two terminals.

13. The CEW of claim 6 wherein the processing circuit stores the lapse of time in memory.

14. The CEW of claim 6 wherein the processing circuit provides a notice of the lapse of time.

15. A method performed by a conducted electrical weapon (“

CEW”

) for detecting whether a current provided by the CEW ionized air in a gap between terminals on the CEW, the method comprising;

initiating delivery of the current, the current for delivery through a target to impede locomotion of the target;

detecting a lapse of time from initiating delivery of the current to an occurrence of a sound of ionization of air in a gap, the current ionizing the air in the gap;

comparing the lapse of time to a threshold to determine whether the current ionized air in the gap between the terminals of the CEW; and

providing a notice responsive to comparing.

16. The method of claim 15 wherein if the lapse of time is less than the threshold, the notice includes indicia that the ionization occurred between the terminals on the CEW whereby the current was not delivered through target tissue.

17. The method of claim 15 wherein if the lapse of time is greater than the threshold, the notice includes indicia that the ionization did not occurred between the terminals on the CEW whereby the current could have been delivered through the target.