Selecting routes

• US 10,018,471 B2
• Filed: 09/25/2014
• Issued: 07/10/2018
• Est. Priority Date: 09/25/2013
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Project X Ltd.
• Original Assignee: Project X Ltd.
• Inventors: Naylor, David
• Primary Examiner(s): Figueroa, Jaime
• Application Number:
  US15/024,343
• Publication Number:
  US 20160209216A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,384 Days
• Field of Search: 701 1, 701410
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 24/0062 Monitoring athletic performances, e.g. for determining the work of a user on an exercise apparatus, the completed jogging or cycling distance
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 24/0075 Means for generating exercise programs or schemes, e.g. computerized virtual trainer, e.g. using expert databases
• CPC Class Codes: G01C 21/20 Instruments for performing navigational calculations G01C21/24, G01C21/26 take precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 20/30 relating to physical therapies or activities, e.g. physiotherapy, acupressure or exercising

Abstract

A method of providing route information to a plurality of users by means of a data processing device, the method comprising: receiving a first location and a second location; analyzing mapping services and/or geographical or other databases or information and thereby determining a pair of routes, each route comprising a start point, an end point and a defined path from the start point to the end point, the step of analyzing comprising determining the routes such that (a) a first one of the routes is in the vicinity of the first location and a second one of the routes is in the vicinity of the second location and (b) the routes are of comparable difficulty for the users to complete; and providing the first route to a first one of the users and providing the second route to a second one of the users.

Claims

1. A method of providing route information to a plurality of users by means of a data processing device, the method comprising:

receiving a first location and a second location;

analysing one or more databases selected from the group comprising mapping services, geographic databases and other databases and thereby determining a pair of routes, each route comprising a start point, an end point and a defined path from the start point to the end point, the step of analysing comprising determining the routes such that (a) a first one of the routes is in the vicinity of the first location and a second one of the routes is in the vicinity of the second location and (b) the routes are of comparable difficulty for the users to complete; and

providing the first route to a first one of the users and providing the second route to a second one of the users,

wherein the step of analysing comprises estimating the physical difficulty of each route and estimating based on data defining one or more personal characteristics of the users that the first one of the users will take a time to complete the first route that is within a predetermined threshold of a time that the second one of the users will take to complete the second route.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the step of analysing comprises estimating the physical difficulty of each route and determining that the estimated physical difficulty of the routes are within a predetermined threshold of each other.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the personal characteristic(s) comprise one or more of the following characteristics:

sex, weight, resting pulse, VO2 max, maximum heart rate, physical condition, physical ability, home altitude and age.

4. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the step of determining that the routes are of comparable difficulty for the users to complete comprises estimating the physical difficulty of each route by summing weighted estimates of one or more characteristics of that route.

5. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the step of determining that the routes are of comparable difficulty for the users to complete comprises estimating the physical difficulty of each route by one of:

a) means of data gathered from them and/or other users who have previously completed the routes or parts of them and/or devices employed along the specified routes; and

b) averaging one or more performance metrics gathered from other users in completing the routes or parts of them.

6. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the step of analysing comprises determining the routes to be comparable by the steps of:

determining a first candidate route;

determining a second candidate route;

comparing the candidate routes and if they are not the same or within acceptable levels of similarity;

subsequently

determining a sub-part of one of the first and second candidate routes that is comparable to the other of the first and second candidate routes; and

selecting the sub-part of one of the first and second candidate routes as the first route and selecting the other of the first and second candidate routes as the second route.

7. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the step of analysing comprises determining the routes to be comparable by the steps of:

determining a first candidate route;

determining a second candidate route;

comparing the candidate routes and if they are not the same or within an acceptable level of similarity;

subsequently

modifying either or both of the first and second candidate routes so that they are the same or within an acceptable level of similarity; and

selecting the candidate routes after appropriate modification to either or both of them.

8. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the step of analysing comprises determining the routes to be comparable by the steps of:

determining a first candidate route;

determining a second candidate route;

comparing the candidate routes and if they are not the same or within an acceptable level of similarity;

subsequently

modifying either or both of the first and second candidate routes so that they are the same or within an acceptable level of similarity; and

selecting the candidate routes after appropriate modification to either or both of them;

wherein the step of modifying involves processes aimed not simply at identifying comparable routes in terms of difficulty but comparable routes optimised for greatest convenience, safety or other benefits for or goals specified by users.

9. The method as claimed in claim 1, comprising the steps of:

the first user completing the first route; and

the second user completing the second route, wherein during the said steps of completing the routes the first user and the second user perform one of;

a) travelling on at least parts of their respective routes simultaneously; and

b) travelling on their respective routes simultaneously.

10. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

the first user completing the first route; and

the second user completing the second route, wherein the first user completes the first route before the second user starts travelling on the second route.

11. A method of providing performance information to a first user, the method comprising:

estimating by means of a transceiver device local to the first user the location of the first user at a series of times;

transmitting from the transceiver device to a data processing device remote from the first user location data representing the estimated location of the first user at a series of times;

estimating at the data processing device, in dependence on the location data, the effort expended by the first user, the estimate of the effort expended being dependent on altitude, relief and/or terrain indicated by the location data;

comparing the estimated effort expended by the first user with an estimated effort expended by a second user and thereby forming result data representing the result of that comparison;

transmitting the result data from the data processing device so the transceiver device; and

presenting the result data to the first user by means of the transceiver device local to the first user.

12. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the method comprises estimating by means of a second transceiver device local to a second user the location of the second user at a series of times;

transmitting from the second transceiver device to the data processing device second location data representing the estimated location of the second user at a series of times;

estimating at the data processing device, in dependence on the second location data, the effort expended by the second user; and

wherein the step of comparing comprises comparing the estimated effort expended by the first user with the estimated effort expended by the second user.

13. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the step of comparing comprises comparing the estimated effort expended by the first user with pre-stored data representing the estimated effort expended by the second user.

14. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the estimate of the effort expended by the first user is dependent on any one or more of:

the distance traveled by the first user as indicated by the location data, the time taken by the first user to traverse that distance, and information regarding the route indicated by the location data as stored in mapping services and/or geographical or other databases or information accessible to the data processing device.

15. The method as claimed in claim 11, comprising the steps of:

determining by means of a data processing system a first area proximal to a first user and a second area proximal to a second user, the first and second areas being determined in dependence on a geographical database as being suitable for the performance of a pre-determined activity;

transmitting an indication of the first area to the device local to the first user; and

transmitting an indication of the second area to the device local to the second user.

16. A method for analysing user activity, the method comprising:

gathering by means of a first datalogger carried by a first user first motion data indicating the motion of the first user along a first course, the first datalogger comprising an accelerometer, the first motion data comprising acceleration data derived from the accelerometer indicating the instantaneous acceleration of the first datalogger;

gathering by means of a second datalogger carried by a second user second motion data indicating the motion of the second user along a second course geographically remote from the first course; and

determining by means of the first motion data and the second motion data a first portion of the first course and a second portion of the second course that involve comparable effort to complete, the effort being determined for the first portion of the first course being based on an estimated difficulty of the first portion, the estimated difficulty of the first portion being based on the first motion data, including the acceleration data.

17. The method as claimed in claim 16, wherein the said difficulty is estimated such that increased variability of the acceleration data during motion of the datalogger over the part of the first portion is determined to represent increased impedance.

18. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium having encoded thereon non-transitory computer readable program code for implementing a method of providing route information to a plurality of users by means of a data processing device, the method comprising:

receiving a first location and a second location;

analysing one or more databases selected from the group comprising mapping services, geographic databases and other databases and thereby determining a pair of routes, each route comprising a start point, an end point and a defined path from the start point to the end point, the step of analysing comprising determining the routes such that (a) a first one of the routes is in the vicinity of the first location and a second one of the routes is in the vicinity of the second location and (b) the routes are of comparable difficulty for the users to complete; and

providing the first route to a first one of the users and providing the second route to a second one of the users,

wherein the step of analysing comprises estimating the physical difficulty of each route and estimating based on data defining one or more personal characteristics of the users that the first one of the users will take a time to complete the first route that is within a predetermined threshold of a time that the second one of the users will take to complete the second route.