Method and apparatus for alert validation

• US 10,026,274 B2
• Filed: 02/01/2017
• Issued: 07/17/2018
• Est. Priority Date: 08/30/2012
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Arria Data2text Limited
• Original Assignee: Arria Data2text Limited
• Inventors: Reiter, Ehud B.
• Primary Examiner(s): Tweel, Jr., John A
• Application Number:
  US15/421,921
• Publication Number:
  US 20170365137A1
• Time in Patent Office: 531 Days
• Field of Search: 3406916
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/14 Tree-structured documents parsing G06F40/205; validation G06F40/226
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/186 Templates
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/56 Natural language generation
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 21/0453 worn on the body to detect health condition by physiological monitoring, e.g. electrocardiogram, temperature, breathing detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes A61B5/00
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 23/00 Alarms responsive to unspecified undesired or abnormal conditions
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 29/18 Prevention or correction of operating errors G08B29/02, G08B29/12 take precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 5/22 using electric transmission; using electromagnetic transmission
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 5/36 using visible light sources
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 7/06 using electric transmission , e.g. involving audible and visible signalling through the use of sound and light sources
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 10/60 for patient-specific data, e.g. for electronic patient records
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 15/00 ICT specially adapted for medical reports, e.g. generation or transmission thereof
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/20 for computer-aided diagnosis, e.g. based on medical expert systems
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/30 for calculating health indices; for individual health risk assessment
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/70 for mining of medical data, e.g. analysing previous cases of other patients
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 70/00 ICT specially adapted for the handling or processing of medical references

Abstract

Methods, apparatuses, and computer program products are described herein that are configured to enable validation of an alert condition. In some example embodiments, a method is provided that comprises detecting an alert condition. The method of this embodiment may also include generating a set of messages based on one or more key events in a primary data channel and one or more significant events in one or more related data channels in response to the alert condition. The method of this embodiment may also include determining a validity of the alert condition based on the set of messages that express the one or more key events, the one or more significant events, a relationship between the one or more key events and the one or more significant events, an alert context and the one or causes of the alert condition.

Claims

1. A method for determining a validity of an alert condition associated with one or more data channels, the method comprising:

determining, using at least one processor, at least one key event in each of one or more primary data channels, wherein the at least one key event indicates the alert condition;

identifying, using the at least one processor, one or more secondary data channels, wherein the one or more secondary data channels are related to the one or more primary data channels, and each of the one or more secondary data channels includes at least one significant event;

determining, based on at least one of the one or more primary data channels, the one or more secondary data channels, and an event relationship between the at least one key event and the at least one significant event, whether the alert condition is intermittently active leading up to a notification time; and

in response to determining that the alert condition is not intermittently active, generating an alert condition validation text, wherein the alert condition validation text is configured to linguistically express at least one of the at least one key event, the at least one significant event, the event relationship, and one or more causes of the alert condition.

2. The method according to claim 1, further comprising:

in response to determining that the alert condition is intermittently active, generating an alert condition invalidation text, wherein the alert condition invalidation text is configured to linguistically express that the alert condition is intermittently active and at least one of the at least one key event, the at least one significant event, the event relationship, and the one or more causes of the alert condition.

3. The method according to claim 1, further comprising:

identifying, using at least one processor, one or more historical data channels, wherein the one or more historical data channels include historical information relating to at least one of the alert condition, the one or more primary data channels, and the one or more secondary data channels.

4. The method according to claim 3, wherein determining whether the alert condition is intermittently active leading up to the notification time includes:

determining, based on the one or more historical data channels, whether at least one prior alert condition exists before the alert condition, wherein the at least one prior alert condition is related to the at least one key event;

in response to determining that the at least one prior alert condition exists before the alert condition, calculating a time period between the at least one prior alert condition and the alert condition; and

determining, using the at least one processor, whether the time period satisfies a pre-determined threshold.

5. The method according to claim 4, further comprising:

determining whether at least one alert validation is performed for the at least one prior alert condition; and

in response to determining that the at least one alert validation is performed for the at least one prior alert condition, identifying at least one alert validation outcome.

6. The method according to claim 5, wherein determining whether the alert condition is intermittently active leading up to the notification time is based at least partially on the at least one alert validation outcome.

7. The method according to claim 4, wherein the pre-determined threshold is determined based on at least one of a domain model, a global parameter, and one or more user inputs.

8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the notification time is an alert condition time or a user-defined time.

14. The apparatus according to claim 5, wherein determining whether the alert condition is intermittently active leading up to the notification time is based at least partially on the at least one alert validation outcome.

9. An apparatus for determining a validity of an alert condition associated with one or more data channels, the apparatus comprising at least one processor and at least one non-transitory memory including program code, the at least one memory and the program code being configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to:

determine, using at least one processor, at least one key event in each of one or more primary data channels, wherein the at least one key event indicates the alert condition;

identify, using the at least one processor, one or more secondary data channels, wherein the one or more secondary data channels are related to the one or more primary data channels, and each of the one or more secondary data channels includes at least one significant event;

determine, based on at least one of the one or more primary data channels, the one or more secondary data channels, and an event relationship between the at least one key event and the at least one significant event, whether the alert condition is intermittently active leading up to a notification time; and

in response to determining that the alert condition is not intermittently active, generate an alert condition validation text, wherein the alert condition validation text is configured to linguistically express at least one of the at least one key event, the at least one significant event, the event relationship, and one or more causes of the alert condition.

10. The apparatus according to claim 9, wherein the at least one non-transitory memory and the program code are further configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to:

in response to determining that the alert condition is intermittently active, generate an alert condition invalidation text, wherein the alert condition invalidation text is configured to linguistically express that the alert condition is intermittently active and at least one of the at least one key event, the at least one significant event, the event relationship, and the one or more causes of the alert condition.

11. The apparatus according to claim 9, wherein the at least one non-transitory memory and the program code are further configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to:

identify, using at least one processor, one or more historical data channels, wherein the one or more historical data channels include historical information relating to at least one of the alert condition, the one or more primary data channels, and the one or more secondary data channels.

12. The apparatus according to claim 11, wherein determining whether the alert condition is intermittently active leading up to the notification time includes:

determine, based on the one or more historical data channels, whether at least one prior alert condition exists before the alert condition, wherein the at least one prior alert condition is related to the at least one key event;

in response to determining that the at least one prior alert condition exists before the alert condition, calculate a time period between the at least one prior alert condition and the alert condition; and

determine, using the at least one processor, whether the time period satisfies a pre-determined threshold.

13. The apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the at least one non-transitory memory and the program code are further configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to:

determine whether at least one alert validation is performed for the at least one prior alert condition; and

in response to determining that the at least one alert validation is performed for the at least one prior alert condition, identify at least one alert validation outcome.

15. The apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the pre-determined threshold is determined based on at least one of a domain model, a global parameter, and one or more user inputs.

16. The apparatus according to claim 9, wherein the notification time is an alert condition time or a user-defined time.