Method and system for visually authenticating the identity of a caller using a video relay service

• US 10,057,256 B1
• Filed: 08/02/2017
• Issued: 08/21/2018
• Est. Priority Date: 08/02/2017
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Chris Talbot
• Original Assignee: Chris Talbot
• Inventors: Talbot, Chris
• Primary Examiner(s): Miller, Brandon J
• Application Number:
  US15/667,583
• Time in Patent Office: 384 Days
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/32 using biometric data, e.g. fingerprints, iris scans or voiceprints
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 21/009 Teaching or communicating with deaf persons G09B21/04 takes precedence; deaf and dumb persons G09B21/00
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/08 for authentication of entities cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for entity authentication H04L9/32
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/0853 using an additional device, e.g. smartcard, SIM or a different communication terminal cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for entity authentication involving additional secure or trusted devices H04L9/3234
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 12/06 Authentication
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 12/12 Detection or prevention of fraud

Abstract

A method and system are disclosed for enabling a real-time visual verification that a video relay service (VRS) call originates from a specific pre-authorized and pre-determined inmate at a corrections facility. The method comprises providing a VRS call recorder, a VRS rules gateway, and a VRS video client being used by the inmate to connect to another VRS client being used by a sign language interpreter (SLI). The display seen by the SLI has a picture-in-picture image showing the inmate (from a database of images of inmates stored in the rules gateway) who should be using the VRS client as well as a real-time video image of the inmate actually using the VRS client. If the picture-in-picture image does not match the live video image, then the audio call to the designated phone number may not be placed by the SLI.

Claims

1. A method for verifying the identity of a user of a video relay service (VRS) system at a corrections facility, the method comprising:

providing a user verification system, including;

a first VRS client at the corrections facility;

a second VRS client for use by a sign language interpreter;

a VRS rules gateway, connected to the first VRS client and the second VRS client;

loading an image of a first user from the VRS rules gateway;

initiating a VRS call between the first VRS client and the second VRS client; and

displaying on the second VRS client a real-time video image from the first VRS client and a picture-in-picture of the image of the first user.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

comparing the video image to the picture-in-picture, wherein if the video image includes an image of a user that matches the picture-in-picture, initiating a call between the sign language interpreter to a second audio phone corresponding to the phone number to be called by the first user.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising determining if the user is a trusted user, wherein if the user is a trusted user skipping the loading an image of the first user from the VRS rules gateway;

the displaying the picture-in-picture; and

the comparing the video image to the picture-in-picture.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein if the video image does not match the picture-in-picture, alerting authorities within the corrections facility.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising acquiring images of a multiplicity of users of the user verification system;

and storing the images in the VRS rules gateway.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining if the first user is authorized to use the VRS system, wherein if the first user is not authorized to use the VRS system, blocking the first user from using the VRS system.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining if the call should be recorded, wherein if the call should be recorded, activating a call recorder.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the multiplicity of users of the user verification system includes the first user.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the multiplicity of users of the user verification system does not include the first user.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising displaying a window on the second VRS client showing user data.

11. A system for verifying that a call using a VRS system originates from a first user at a corrections facility, comprising:

a first VRS client at the corrections facility;

a second VRS client for use by a sign language interpreter;

a VRS rules gateway, connected to the first and second VRS clients; and

a first audio phone for use by the sign language interpreter;

wherein the second VRS client is configured to display a picture-in-picture image of the first user along with a real-time video image of a second user at the first VRS client, wherein the second user may be the same as the first user.

12. The system of claim 11, wherein the sign language interpreter may compare the video image to the picture-in-picture.

13. The system of claim 12, wherein if the if the video image matches the picture-in-picture, initiating a call using the first audio phone to a second audio phone.

14. The system of claim 13, wherein the phone number of the second audio phone is comprised in a list of user data for the first user.

15. The system of claim 11, further comprising an authorized users list.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein if the user identity is not on the authorized users list, the first user is blocked from using the VRS system.

17. A method for verifying the identity of an inmate at a corrections facility during a video relay service (VRS) call, the method comprising:

initiating a VRS call between an inmate and a called party;

prior to contacting the called party, comparing a stored image of the inmate with a live image of the inmate shown during the VRS call;

in response to determining that the stored image of the inmate matches the live image of the inmate shown during the VRS call, contacting the called party; and

in response to determining that the stored image of the inmate does not match the image of the inmate shown during the VRS call, terminating the call.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein comparing the stored image of the inmate with the live image of the inmate shown during the VRS call further comprises:

displaying the stored image as a picture-in-picture image overlaid on at least a portion of the live image of the inmate displayed during the VRS call;

comparing, by a trusted third party, the picture-in-picture image with the live image of the inmate to determine whether the stored image of the inmate matches the live image of the inmate shown during the VRS call.

19. The method of claim 18, in which the trusted third party is a sign language interpreter used during the VRS call.

20. The method of claim 18, in which the trusted third party is a guard or a warden.

21. The method of claim 17, wherein comparing the stored image of the inmate with the live image of the inmate shown during the VRS call is performed by automated facial recognition software.

22. The method of claim 17, wherein comparing the stored image of the inmate with the live image of the inmate shown during the VRS call is performed substantially continuously for the duration of the VRS call.