Energy management methods and systems based on financial impact

• US 10,140,670 B2
• Filed: 08/31/2012
• Issued: 11/27/2018
• Est. Priority Date: 08/31/2012
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Engie Storage Services NA LLC (ENGIE SA)
• Original Assignee: Engie Storage Services NA LLC (ENGIE SA)
• Inventors: Gow, Philippe Hart
• Primary Examiner(s): Saavedra, Emilio J
• Application Number:
  US13/601,777
• Publication Number:
  US 20140067140A1
• Time in Patent Office: 2,279 Days
• Field of Search: 700291
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/06 Energy or water supply
• CPC Class Codes: H02J 3/00 Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
• CPC Class Codes: Y02B 70/3225 Demand response systems, e.g. load shedding, peak shaving
• CPC Class Codes: Y04S 20/222 Demand response systems, e.g. load shedding, peak shaving

Abstract

Energy management methods and systems based on financial impact are disclosed herein, wherein an energy management system at a site monitors metered energy consumption, establishes a peak consumption level, determines whether energy consumption will result in an increased peak consumption level, and if it will, calculates the financial value and costs of mitigating an increase in the peak consumption level, including an increase in demand charge prospectively avoided, and mitigates the peak in consumption to the peak consumption level using an energy storage system or other energy providing device if the value of mitigating the peak offsets the inherent costs. Embodiments may further use confidence factors or incremental changes to a peak consumption level to optimize the process and utilize energy devices to their greatest effectiveness.

Claims

1. A method of managing electrical energy consumption of a consumer, the method comprising:

determining that an energy consumption level of a site will prospectively result in an increase to an average consumption level of the site in a division of time of a billing cycle comprising a plurality of peaks in consumption;

calculating a financial value of discharging an energy source at the site during the billing cycle to prospectively mitigate the increase in the average consumption level, the financial value being weighted by a first factor, a second factor, and a third factor, the first factor representing at least one demand charge increase prospectively avoided by mitigating the increase in the average consumption level, the second factor being inversely related to a time required to replenish the energy source after mitigating the increase to the average consumption level, and the third factor representing a frequency of occurrence of the plurality of peaks in the billing cycle;

calculating a financial cost of prospectively mitigating the increase in the average consumption level;

providing energy from the energy source to mitigate the increase in the average consumption level when the financial value at least offsets the financial cost.

2. A method of managing electrical energy consumption of a consumer, the method comprising:

determining that an energy consumption level of a site will prospectively result in an increase to a maximum consumption level of a billing period, the billing period comprising at least a plurality of days;

calculating a financial value of discharging an energy source at the site during the billing period to prospectively mitigate the increase in the maximum consumption level and representing a cost of discharging the energy source, wherein the financial value is proportional to a first factor representing at least one demand charge increase prospectively avoided by mitigating the increase in the maximum consumption level, and wherein the financial value is proportional to a second factor being inversely related to a time required to replenish the energy source after mitigating the increase to the maximum consumption level and inversely related to a time remaining in the billing period, and wherein the financial value is proportional to a frequency of occurrence of peaks in consumption in the billing period;

calculating a financial cost of prospectively mitigating the increase in the maximum consumption level;

providing energy from the energy source to mitigate the increase in the maximum consumption level when the financial value at least offsets the financial cost.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the peaks in consumption are peaks in the energy consumption level of the site.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein the second factor is proportional to a magnitude of peaks in the energy consumption level.

5. The method of claim 2, wherein the second factor is proportional to an amount of charge remaining in the energy source.

6. The method of claim 2, wherein the second factor is proportional to a current or projected peak consumption level.

7. The method of claim 2, wherein the second factor (C),