Techniques for benchmarking pairing strategies in a contact center system
First Claim
Patent Images
1. A method for benchmarking in a contact center system comprising:
- determining, by at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in the contact center system, an identifier for each contact of a plurality of contacts;
for each contact, selecting, by the at least one computer processor, one of a first pairing strategy or a second pairing strategy based on the unique identifier, wherein the selecting comprises searching, by the at least one computer processor, a plurality of historical contact-agent interaction records for a record of a prior pairing, wherein the record of the prior pairing includes an indicator of a previously selected one of the first or second pairing strategy used for the prior pairing;
pairing, by the at least one computer processor, each contact to a corresponding agent for connection in the contact center system using the selected one of the first or second pairing strategy, wherein the pairing comprises establishing, by a switch of the contact center system, a connection between communication equipment of each contact and communication equipment of each corresponding agent based upon at least one of the first and second pairing strategies;
determining, by the at least one computer processor, a difference in performance between the first pairing strategy selected for pairing a first subset of the plurality of contacts and the second pairing strategy selected for pairing a second subset of the plurality of contacts, wherein the difference in performance provides an indication that pairing contacts and agents using the first pairing strategy results in a performance gain for the contact center system attributable to the first pairing strategy; and
outputting, by the at least one computer processor, the difference in performance between the first and second pairing strategies for benchmarking the first and second pairing strategies.
3 Assignments
0 Petitions
Accused Products
Abstract
Techniques for benchmarking pairing strategies in a contact center system are disclosed. In one particular embodiment, the techniques may be realized as a method for techniques for benchmarking pairing strategies in a contact center system comprising: cycling, by at least one processor, among at least two pairing strategies; and determining, by the at least one processor, a difference in performance between the at least two pairing strategies.
247 Citations
23 Claims
-
1. A method for benchmarking in a contact center system comprising:
-
determining, by at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in the contact center system, an identifier for each contact of a plurality of contacts; for each contact, selecting, by the at least one computer processor, one of a first pairing strategy or a second pairing strategy based on the unique identifier, wherein the selecting comprises searching, by the at least one computer processor, a plurality of historical contact-agent interaction records for a record of a prior pairing, wherein the record of the prior pairing includes an indicator of a previously selected one of the first or second pairing strategy used for the prior pairing; pairing, by the at least one computer processor, each contact to a corresponding agent for connection in the contact center system using the selected one of the first or second pairing strategy, wherein the pairing comprises establishing, by a switch of the contact center system, a connection between communication equipment of each contact and communication equipment of each corresponding agent based upon at least one of the first and second pairing strategies; determining, by the at least one computer processor, a difference in performance between the first pairing strategy selected for pairing a first subset of the plurality of contacts and the second pairing strategy selected for pairing a second subset of the plurality of contacts, wherein the difference in performance provides an indication that pairing contacts and agents using the first pairing strategy results in a performance gain for the contact center system attributable to the first pairing strategy; and outputting, by the at least one computer processor, the difference in performance between the first and second pairing strategies for benchmarking the first and second pairing strategies. - View Dependent Claims (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8)
-
-
9. A system for benchmarking in a contact center system comprising:
at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in the contact center system, wherein the at least one computer processor is further configured to; determine an identifier for each contact of a plurality of contacts; for each contact, select one of a first pairing strategy or a second pairing strategy based on the identifier, wherein the selecting comprises searching a plurality of historical contact-agent interaction records for a record of a prior pairing, wherein the record of the prior pairing includes an indicator of a previously selected one of the first or second pairing strategy used for the prior pairing; pair each contact to a corresponding agent for connection in the contact center system using the selected one of the first or second pairing strategy, wherein the pairing comprises establishing, by a switch of the contact center system, a connection between communication equipment of each contact and communication equipment of each corresponding agent based upon at least one of the first and second pairing strategies; determine a difference in performance between the first pairing strategy selected for pairing a first subset of the plurality of contacts and the second pairing strategy selected for pairing a second subset of the plurality of contacts, wherein the difference in performance provides an indication that pairing contacts and agents using the first pairing strategy results in a performance gain for the contact center system attributable to the first pairing strategy; and output the difference in performance between the first and second pairing strategies for benchmarking the first and second pairing strategies. - View Dependent Claims (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16)
-
17. An article of manufacture for benchmarking in a contact center system in a contact center system comprising:
-
a non-transitory processor readable medium; and instructions stored on the medium; wherein the instructions are configured to be readable from the medium by at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in the contact center system and thereby cause the at least one computer processor to operate so as to; determine an identifier for each contact of a plurality of contacts; for each contact, select one of a first pairing strategy or a second pairing strategy based on the identifier, wherein the selecting comprises searching a plurality of historical contact-agent interaction records for a record of a prior pairing, wherein the record of the prior pairing includes an indicator of a previously selected one of the first or second pairing strategy used for the prior pairing; pair each contact to a corresponding agent for connection in the contact center system using the selected one of the first or second pairing strategy, wherein the pairing comprises establishing, by a switch of the contact center system, a connection between communication equipment of each contact and communication equipment of each corresponding agent based upon at least one of the first and second pairing strategies; determine a difference in performance between the first pairing strategy selected for pairing a first subset of the plurality of contacts and the second pairing strategy selected for pairing a second subset of the plurality of contacts, wherein the difference in performance provides an indication that pairing contacts and agents using the first pairing strategy results in a performance gain for the contact center system attributable to the first pairing strategy; and output the difference in performance between the first and second pairing strategies for benchmarking the first and second pairing strategies. - View Dependent Claims (18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23)
-
Specification