Systems and methods for automated optimization of a multi-mode inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer

• US 10,181,394 B2
• Filed: 02/13/2015
• Issued: 01/15/2019
• Est. Priority Date: 02/14/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Perkin Elmer Life Sciences
• Original Assignee: Perkinelmer Health Sciences Incorporated (Perkinelmer Incorporated)
• Inventors: Bazargan, Samad, Badiei, Hamid, Patel, Pritesh
• Primary Examiner(s): Pham, Ly D
• Application Number:
  US14/622,132
• Publication Number:
  US 20150235827A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,432 Days
• Field of Search: 702116
• CPC Class Codes: H01J 49/0009 Calibration of the apparatus
• CPC Class Codes: H01J 49/0027 Methods for using particle spectrometers
• CPC Class Codes: H01J 49/0031 Step by step routines describing the use of the apparatus H01J49/0081 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: H01J 49/061 Ion deflecting means, e.g. ion gates
• CPC Class Codes: H01J 49/105 using high-frequency excitation, e.g. microwave excitation, Inductively Coupled Plasma [ICP]

Abstract

The present disclosure provides methods and systems for automated tuning of multimode inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometers (ICP-MS). In certain embodiments, a ‘single click’ optimization method is provided for a multi-mode ICP-MS system that automates tuning of the system in one or more modes selected from among the multiple modes, e.g., a vented cell mode, a reaction cell mode (e.g., dynamic reaction cell mode), and a collision cell mode (e.g., kinetic energy discrimination mode). Workflows and computational routines, including a dynamic range optimization technique, are presented that provide faster, more efficient, and more accurate tuning.

Claims

1. A system for automated optimization (tuning) of a multi-mode inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS), the system comprising:

a plasma gas source;

an inductively coupled plasma torch (ICP torch) and RF coil for generating a plasma in which an analyte sample is introduced and from which an ion beam exits;

a vacuum chamber into which the ion beam enters, wherein the vacuum chamber comprises a mass analyzer and detector for detection and/or quantification of analyte ionic species in the analyte sample; and

a controller for carrying out an automated optimization routine, wherein the controller is operatively connected to a computer-readable medium comprising instructions, that, when executed, cause a processor to;

receive user data input regarding an optimization to be performed on the ICP-MS for tuning of components of the ICP-MS for accurate detection and/or quantification of analyte ionic species in the analyte sample, wherein the user data input comprises an identification of one or more selected modes of operation in which the ICP-MS is to be operated;

receive a user input for initiating an automated optimization routine for the tuning of components of the ICP-MS for accurate detection and/or quantification of analyte ionic species in the analyte sample; and

following receipt of the user input for initiating the routine, transmit a first signal to the controller,

wherein the first signal, when received, causes the controller to perform the automated optimization routine for the tuning of components of the ICP-MS, wherein the automated optimization routine comprises an ICP-MS performance assessment subsequence, said subsequence comprising the steps of

(a) automatically conducting a first performance assessment comprising a preliminary evaluative check of instrument sensitivity, said preliminary evaluative check comprising comparing a sensitivity of a measurement of a calibration standard solution by the ICP-MS to predetermined instrument performance specifications, then,

(i) responsive to a determination, by the processor, that the first performance assessment is unsatisfactory, ending the ICP-MS subsequence and identifying the ICP-MS performance assessment subsequence as failed, and

(ii) responsive to a determination, by the processor, that the first performance assessment is satisfactory, conducting a second performance assessment, wherein the first performance assessment contains fewer steps and is less time consuming to conduct than the second performance assessment, then

 

(A) responsive to a determination, by the processor, that the second performance assessment is unsatisfactory, ending the ICP-MS subsequence and identifying the ICP-MS performance assessment subsequence as failed, and

 

(B) responsive to a determination, by the processor, that the second performance assessment is satisfactory, ending the subsequence and identifying the ICP-MS performance assessment subsequence as passed,

wherein the instructions cause the processor, responsive to an identification of the ICP-MS performance assessment subsequence is as failed, to transmit a second signal to the controller, identifying the ICP-MS performance assessment subsequence as failed and tuning of the ICP-MS as being needed, wherein the second signal, when received by the controller, causes the controller to perform the tuning of the components of the ICP-MS, wherein the tuning comprises automatic adjustment of the ICP torch per an optimization subroutine, wherein the optimization subroutine comprises automatically adjusting an alignment of an X-Y position of the ICP torch relative to an ion optics assembly of the ICP-MS, wherein the X-Y position of the ICP torch corresponds to vertical and horizontal settings of the ICP torch.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more selected modes include one, two, or all three of:

(a) a vented cell mode, (b) a reaction cell mode, and (c) a collision cell mode.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the user input for initiating the routine comprises at least one action selected from the group consisting of a ‘

single click’

, a keystroke, a swipe, and a selection of a graphical user interface widget.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein the automated optimization routine comprises a plurality of levels, each level having a further optimization subroutine associated therewith followed by a further ICP-MS performance assessment subsequence that indicates whether to proceed from one level of said plurality of levels of the automated optimization routine to a subsequent level.

5. The system of claim 1, wherein the adjustment of one or more components of the ICP-MS further comprises one or more steps selected from the group consisting of (i) quadrupole ion deflector (QID) optimization, (ii) quadrupole rod offset (QRO), (iii) nebulizer gas flow optimization, (iv) cell rod offset (CRO) optimization, (v) cell entrance and/or exit optimization, (vi) mass calibration, and (vii) detector optimization.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein the automated tuning of one or Mare components of the ICP-MS further comprises:

one or both of (i) a nebulizer gas flow optimization step, and (ii) a quadrupole ion deflector (QID) optimization step, said automated optimization routine comprising a dynamic range optimization subsequence associated with steps (i) and/or (ii),

wherein the dynamic range optimization subsequence comprises initiating the associated step (i) and/or (ii) by adjusting an associated setting within a predetermined initial range determined from a stored value of the associated setting identified in a previous optimization of the ICP-MS, and if optimization criteria are not met within the predetermined initial range, automatically identifying a range in a direction of improved performance, continuing to identify subsequent ranges until the optimization criteria are met, and recording an adjusted, associated setting for later use.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein the tuning of components of the ICP-MS further comprises one or both of (i) a cell rod offset (CRO) step, and (ii) a cell entrance/exit step, said automated optimization routine comprising a normalization subroutine associated with the cell rod optimization step and/or the cell entrance/exit step, wherein the normalization subroutine comprises identifying an optimized setting associated with the step by normalizing pulse intensities determined from the ICP-MS at respective voltages, for each of a plurality of analytes, and using normalized values to identify the optimized setting.

8. The system of claim 7, wherein the normalization subroutine further comprises the step of multiplying the normalized values at the respective voltages and identifying a best compromised point from the result, thereby identifying the optimized setting.

9. The system of claim 1, the system further comprising an autosampler, wherein the automated optimization routine comprises a smart sampling subroutine comprising (i) the step of identifying, during the automated optimization routine, if and when use of a first analyte solution should be discontinued and use of a second analyte solution be initiated, and (ii) the step of, upon identification that the first analyte solution should be discontinued and use of the second analyte solution be initiated, transmitting, by the processor, a signal to initiate automated introduction of the second analyte solution in the ICP-MS via the autosampler.

10. The system of claim 1, wherein the automated optimization routine comprises the step of rendering, by the processor, for presentation on a graphical user interface, graphical and/or alphanumeric output representing one or more steps being performed in the automated optimization routine.

11. The system of claim 10, wherein the automated optimization routine comprises the step of displaying the graphical and/or alphanumeric output on the graphical user interface in real time as the corresponding one or more steps are being performed during the automated optimization routine.

12. The system of claim 1, wherein the user data input regarding the optimization further comprises an indication of cell gas flow rate.

13. The system of claim 1, wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the processor to, responsive to an identification of the ICP-MS performance assessment subsequence as passed, transmit a third signal to the controller, identifying the ICP-MS performance assessment subsequence as passed and tuning of the ICP-MS as not being needed, wherein the third signal, when received by the controller, causes the controller to end the automated optimization routine.

14. The system of claim 4, wherein the further ICP-MS performance assessment subsequence following each further optimization subroutine comprises a short performance assessment followed by a long performance assessment, wherein the short performance assessment contains fewer steps and is less time consuming to conduct than the long performance assessment, and wherein the further ICP-MS performance assessment subsequence ends if the short performance assessment is determined by the processor to have failed such that a next further optimization subroutine can proceed without conducting the long performance assessment.

15. The system of claim 4, wherein the plurality of levels comprises a first-performed level, comprising the automatic adjustment of the alignment of the X-Y position of the ICP torch by the optimization subroutine and one or both automated adjustments selected from the group consisting of (i) nebulizer gas flow optimization and (ii) quadrupole ion deflector (QID) optimization.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein the plurality of levels comprises a second-performed level performed subsequent to the first-performed level, the second-performed level comprising one or more automated adjustments selected from the group consisting of (i) cell rod offset (CRO) optimization, (ii) cell entrance and/or exit optimization, (iii) quadrupole ion deflector (QID) optimization, and (iv) nebulizer gas flow optimization.

17. The system of claim 16, wherein the plurality of levels comprises a third-performed level, performed subsequent to the second-performed level, the third-performed level comprising mass calibration.

18. The system of claim 17, wherein the plurality of levels comprises a fourth-performed level, performed subsequent to the third-performed level, the fourth performed level comprising detector optimization.

19. The system of claim 1, wherein the first performance assessment comprises using the ICP-MS to measure a signal intensity value for the calibration standard solution, said solution comprising one or more analytes, and comparing the signal intensity value to a predefined threshold.

20. The system of claim 19, wherein the one or more analytes are selected from the group consisting of Beryllium (⁹Be), Indium (¹¹⁵In), and Uranium (²³⁸U).

21. The system of claim 19, wherein the determination that the first performance assessment is unsatisfactory comprises an assessment that the signal intensity value does not satisfy a predetermined criteria and/or an assessment that the signal intensity value is below the predefined threshold.

22. The system of claim 19, wherein the determination that the first performance assessment is satisfactory comprises an assessment that the signal intensity value satisfies a predetermined criteria and/or an assessment that the signal intensity value is at or exceeds the predefined threshold.

23. The system of claim 1, wherein the second performance assessment comprises using the ICP-MS to measure a signal intensity value of one or more analytes of the calibration standard solution not tested in the preliminary evaluative check and/or wherein the second performance assessment comprises evaluation of a criterion in addition to those in the preliminary evaluative check.

24. The system of claim 23, wherein the determination that the second performance assessment is unsatisfactory comprises an assessment that the signal intensity value does not satisfy a predetermined criteria and/or an assessment that the signal intensity value is below a predefined threshold.

25. The system of claim 23, wherein the determination that the second performance assessment is satisfactory comprises an assessment that the signal intensity value satisfies a predetermined criteria and/or an assessment that the signal intensity value is at or exceeds a predefined threshold.