Roof support monitoring for longwall system

• US 10,184,338 B2
• Filed: 08/04/2017
• Issued: 01/22/2019
• Est. Priority Date: 08/28/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Joy Global Underground Mining LLC (Komatsu Ltd.)
• Original Assignee: Joy Global Underground Mining LLC (Komatsu Ltd.)
• Inventors: Siegrist, Paul M., Buttery, Nigel J., Kiyingi, Kirabo
• Primary Examiner(s): Previl, Daniel
• Application Number:
  US15/669,032
• Publication Number:
  US 20170335688A1
• Time in Patent Office: 536 Days
• Field of Search: 340566, 340657, 34053812, 34053813, 3405688, 340571, 3405721, 3405737, 340588, 340589, 3406916, 340692, 340 343, 340 344, 34082523
• CPC Class Codes: E21D 23/066 Pivoted cantilever extensions therefor
• CPC Class Codes: E21D 23/12 Control, e.g. using remote control E21D23/16 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: E21F 17/185 Rock-pressure control devices with or without alarm devices; Alarm devices in case of roof subsidence props with load-measuring devices E21D15/46

Abstract

A monitoring device and method for monitoring a longwall mining system having a roof support, the roof support including a pressure sensor to determine pressure levels of the roof support during a monitoring cycle. Pressure information is obtained for the roof support. An electronic processor then determines whether the pressure information is indicative of a first type of pressure failure of the roof support and whether the pressure information is indicative of a second type of pressure failure of the roof support. An alert is generated in response to determining that the pressure information is indicative of at least one selected from the group consisting of the first type of pressure failure and the second type of pressure failure.

Claims

1. A method of monitoring a roof support of a longwall mining system, the method comprising:

obtaining, with an electronic processor, pressure information for the roof support;

determining, with the electronic processor, whether the pressure information is indicative of a first type of pressure failure of the roof support by determining whether the roof support achieved set pressure within a first predetermined amount of time;

determining, with the electronic processor, whether the pressure information is indicative of a second type of pressure failure of the roof support, the second type of pressure failure being different than the first type of pressure failure; and

generating, with the electronic processor, an alert in response to determining that the pressure information is indicative of at least one selected from the group consisting of the first type of pressure failure and the second type of pressure failure.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining whether the pressure information is indicative of the second type of pressure failure includes determining whether the roof support achieved high set pressure within a second predetermined amount of time.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the second predetermined amount of time is longer than the first predetermined amount of time.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the second predetermined amount of time is shorter than an expected amount of time in which strata above the roof support is expected to cave.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein obtaining pressure information includes obtaining a plurality of pressure measurements over a predetermined monitoring cycle, and further comprising:

identifying, with the electronic processor, a minimum pressure achieved by the roof support over the monitoring cycle, and

determining, with the electronic processor, that the roof support is in a lowered position when the pressure information is at the minimum pressure.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein determining whether the pressure information is indicative of the first type of pressure failure includes determining whether the roof support achieved a target pressure within a predetermined amount of time after the roof support achieves the minimum pressure.

7. The method of claim 5, further comprising receiving, with the electronic processor, an indication of whether a lowering motor of the roof support is activated, and wherein determining that the roof support is in the lowered position includes determining that the roof support is in the lowered position based on the indication.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the pressure information includes pressure information obtained over a current shear cycle, and further comprising:

accessing, with the electronic processor, pressure information obtained over a previous shear cycle,

comparing, with the electronic processor, pressure information obtained over the previous shear cycle with pressure information obtained over the current shear cycle, and

generating, with the electronic processor, a second alert based on comparing the pressure information obtained over the previous shear cycle with the pressure information obtained over the current shear cycle.

9. A monitoring device for a longwall mining system having a roof support including a pressure sensor to determine pressure levels of the roof support, the monitoring device comprising:

a memory; and

an electronic processor coupled to the memory and in communication with the pressure sensor to receive pressure information for the roof support, the electronic processor configured to;

determine whether the pressure information is indicative of a first type of pressure failure based on whether the roof support achieved set pressure within a predetermined amount of time, determine whether the pressure information is indicative of a second type of pressure failure, the second type of pressure failure being different than the first type of pressure failure, and

generate an alert in response to determining that the pressure information is indicative of at least one selected from the group consisting of the first type of pressure failure and the second type of pressure failure.

10. The monitoring device of claim 9, wherein the second type of pressure failure is based on whether the roof support achieves high set pressure with a second predetermined amount of time.

11. The monitoring device of claim 10, wherein the second predetermined amount of time is longer than the first predetermined amount of time.

12. The monitoring device of claim 9, wherein the pressure information is based on an average pressure calculated from a first pressure measurement of a right leg of the roof support and a second pressure measurement of a left leg of the roof support.

13. The monitoring device of claim 9, wherein the pressure information includes a plurality of pressure measurements obtained over a predetermined monitoring cycle, and wherein the electronic processor is configured to:

identify a minimum pressure achieved by the roof support, and

determine that the roof support is in a lowered position when the pressure information is at the minimum pressure.

14. The monitoring device of claim 13, wherein the electronic processor is configured to determine that the pressure information is indicative of the first type of pressure failure when the roof support fails to achieve a target pressure within a predetermined amount of time after the roof support achieves the minimum pressure.

15. The monitoring device of claim 9, wherein the pressure information includes pressure information obtained over a current shear cycle, and wherein the electronic processor is configured to:

access pressure information obtained over a previous shear cycle,

compare the pressure information obtained over the previous shear cycle with the pressure information obtained over the current shear cycle, and

generate a second alert based on the comparison between the pressure information obtained over the previous shear cycle with the pressure information obtained over the current shear cycle.

16. The monitoring device of claim 9, wherein the alert is a first type of alert when the pressure information is indicative of the first type of pressure failure, and wherein the electronic processor is configured to generate a second type of alert when the pressure information is indicative of the second type of pressure failure, the second type of alert being different than the first type of alert.