Radio with dynamically controlled correlation threshold

• US 10,218,493 B2
• Filed: 02/27/2017
• Issued: 02/26/2019
• Est. Priority Date: 02/27/2017
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Itron, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Itron, Inc.
• Inventors: Seely, Danny Ray, Lin, Junsong, McNamee, Michael David
• Primary Examiner(s): Orgad, Edan
• Assistant Examiner(s): Lalchinthang, Vanneilian
• Application Number:
  US15/443,495
• Publication Number:
  US 20180248681A1
• Time in Patent Office: 729 Days
• Field of Search: 370503
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 1/00 Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received correcting synchronisation H04L7/00
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 1/0045 Arrangements at the receiver end
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 1/203 Details of error rate determination, e.g. BER, FER or WER
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/0823 Errors, e.g. transmission errors
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/16 Threshold monitoring
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 7/042 Detectors therefor, e.g. correlators, state machines digital correlators in general G06F17/15

Abstract

In a radio using a plurality of channels defined in a radio frequency (RF) spectrum, a rate of false packet detections may be calculated for each of the plurality of channels using a plurality of respective correlation thresholds. The rate of false packet detections for each channel may be compared to a range of acceptable rates of false packet detections. The same or different ranges of acceptable rates of false packet detections may be used for each channel or each channel plan. Different correlation thresholds may be adjusted based at least in part on the comparisons. For example, if a rate of false packet detections exceeds a range of acceptable rates of false packet detections, the correlation threshold may be raised, or the reverse. A packet may be detected on different channels based on different adjusted correlation thresholds.

Claims

1. A method, comprising:

receiving and processing, at an analog frontend, a radio frequency (RF) signal;

receiving, at a digital backend, digital signals based on the processed RF signal;

defining, by operation of a channelizer of the digital backend, a plurality of channels;

calculating, by operation of a logic device, a plurality of rates of false packet detections associated with the plurality of channels, respectively;

adjusting, by operation of a correlation threshold calculator, based at least in part on a first rate of false packet detections from among the plurality of rates of false packet detections, a first correlation threshold associated for use with a first channel from among the plurality of channels and for use with a first modulation scheme;

correlating, using a packet processor, a signal from the channelizer with a preamble of a packet, wherein the correlating is based at least in part on the first correlation threshold, the first channel and the first modulation scheme, wherein the packet processor comprises a plurality of correlation loops, each correlation loop associated with a respective correlation threshold from among a plurality of correlation thresholds adjusted by the correlation threshold calculator, and wherein at least some of the plurality of correlation thresholds are used to evaluate correlation of signals in a particular channel plan and at least some are used to evaluate correlation of signals using a particular modulation scheme;

decoding, by operation of one of a plurality of decoders, the packet within the first channel using the first modulation scheme.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the correlation threshold calculator performs further actions comprising:

adjusting correlation thresholds associated with each of the plurality of correlation loops of the packet processor.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein:

detecting the packet and detecting a second packet are performed using the same modulation scheme.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein:

adjusting the first correlation threshold comprises increasing the first correlation threshold; and

adjusting a second correlation threshold comprises decreasing the second correlation threshold.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein adjusting the first correlation threshold comprises:

increasing the first correlation threshold in response to detecting an increased rate of false packet detections received via the first channel;

or

decreasing the first correlation threshold in response to detecting a decreased rate of false packet detections received via the first channel.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein adjusting the first correlation threshold comprises:

comparing a rate of false packet detections for the first channel to a range of acceptable rates of false packet detections; and

adjusting the first correlation threshold if the rate of false packet detections for the first channel is outside the range of acceptable rates of false packet detections.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein adjusting the first correlation threshold comprises:

increasing the first correlation threshold if a rate of false packet detections for the first channel is above a range of acceptable rates of false packet detections per unit time;

decreasing the first correlation threshold if the rate of false packet detections for the first channel is below the range of acceptable rates of false packet detections per unit time; and

not changing the first correlation threshold if the rate of false packet detections for the first channel is within the range of acceptable rates of false packet detections per unit time.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

calculating the first rate of false packet detections for the first channel, wherein the calculating is based on signals decoded in the first channel by a first modulation scheme, and wherein adjusting the first correlation threshold associated with the first channel is performed based at least in part on the rate of false packet detections calculated for the first channel; and

calculating a second rate of false packet detections for a second channel, wherein the calculating is based on signals decoded in the second channel by the first modulation scheme, and wherein adjusting a second correlation threshold associated with the second channel is performed based at least in part on the rate of false packet detections calculated for the second channel.

9. The method of claim 1, additionally comprising:

adjusting the first correlation threshold based at least in part on a range of acceptable rates of false packet detections; and

setting at least one of an upper endpoint and a lower endpoint of the range of acceptable rates of false packet detections, wherein the setting is based at least in part on a number of channels defined in spectrum used by the digital backend.

10. A radio, comprising:

an analog frontend to receive and process a radio frequency (RF) signal;

an analog to digital converter communicatively coupled to the analog frontend to convert an analog signal from the analog frontend to a digital signal; and

a digital backend, communicatively coupled to the analog to digital converter to receive the digital signal from the analog to digital converter, comprising;

a packet processor, comprising a plurality of correlation loops, each correlation loop associated with a respective correlation threshold from among a plurality of correlation thresholds, wherein at least some of the plurality of correlation thresholds are used to measure correlation using a particular channel plan and at least some are used to measure correlation using a particular modulation scheme, and wherein the packet processor processes data from a plurality of decoders;

wherein the digital backend performs actions comprising;

calculating a first rate of false packet detections for a first channel;

adjusting a first correlation threshold associated with the first channel, wherein the adjusting of the first correlation threshold associated with the first channel is performed based at least in part on a comparison of the first rate of false packet detections to a range of acceptable rates of false packet detections;

correlating a first incoming signal on the first channel with a first known preamble of a first packet using the first correlation threshold;

decoding the first packet defined by the first incoming signal;

calculating a second rate of false packet detections for a second channel.

11. The radio as recited in claim 10, wherein the actions further comprise:

comparing the first rate of false packet detections to a range of acceptable rates of false packet detections, wherein the adjusting of the first correlation threshold associated with the first channel is performed based at least in part on the comparison of the first rate of false packet detections to the range of acceptable rates of false packet detections;

calculating a second rate of false packet detections for the second channel;

comparing the second rate of false packet detections to the range of acceptable rates of false packet detections, wherein the adjusting of the second correlation threshold associated with the second channel is performed based at least in part on the comparison of the second rate of false packet detections to the range of acceptable rates of false packet detections.

12. The radio as recited in claim 10, wherein:

decoding the first packet is performed using a first modulation scheme; and

decoding the second packet is performed using a second modulation scheme, different from the first modulation scheme.

13. The radio as recited in claim 10, wherein the actions additionally comprise:

increasing the first correlation threshold if a first rate of false packet detections, in the first channel, is greater than a range of acceptable rates of false packet detections; and

decreasing the second correlation threshold if a second rate of false packet detections, in the second channel, is less than the range of acceptable rates of false packet detections.

14. The radio as recited in claim 13, wherein the actions additionally comprise:

changing the range of acceptable rates of false packet detections, wherein the changing is based at least in part on changes to a number of channels defined in spectrum received by the radio.

15. The radio as recited in claim 10, wherein the actions additionally comprise:

calculating a first rate of false packet detections, associated with the first channel using a first modulation scheme; and

calculating a second rate of false packet detections, associated with the first channel using a second modulation scheme.

16. A radio, comprising:

an analog frontend to receive and process a radio frequency (RF) signal;

a digital backend, to receive digital signals based on the process RF signal, the digital backend comprising;

a packet processor, comprising a plurality of correlation loops, each correlation loop associated with a respective correlation threshold from among a plurality of correlation thresholds, wherein at least some of the plurality of correlation thresholds are used to measure correlation using a particular channel plan and at least some are used to measure correlation using a particular modulation scheme, and wherein the packet processor processes data from a plurality of decoders;

wherein the digital backend performs actions comprising;

receiving a first RF signal in a first channel, wherein the first channel is defined in an RF spectrum;

adjusting a first correlation threshold for use with the first channel;

using the first correlation threshold to identify a first packet in the first channel;

receiving a second RF signal in a second channel, wherein the second channel is different from the first channel, and wherein the second channel is defined in the RF spectrum;

adjusting a second correlation threshold for use with the second channel, wherein the first correlation threshold and the second correlation threshold are different; and

using the second correlation threshold to identify a second packet in the second channel.

17. The radio as recited in claim 16, wherein the actions further comprise:

calculating a rate of false packet detections for the first channel, wherein adjusting the first correlation threshold associated with the first channel is performed based at least in part on the rate of false packet detections calculated for the first channel; and

calculating a rate of false packet detections for the second channel, wherein adjusting the second correlation threshold associated with the second channel is performed based at least in part on the rate of false packet detections calculated for the second channel, and wherein the first correlation threshold and the second correlation threshold are different.

18. The radio as recited in claim 16, wherein:

adjusting the first correlation threshold comprises increasing the first correlation threshold; and

adjusting the second correlation threshold comprises decreasing the second correlation threshold.

19. The radio as recited in claim 16, wherein the actions further comprise:

calculating a rate of false packet detections for the first channel over a measurement period of one hour or less.

20. The radio as recited in claim 16, wherein:

adjusting the first correlation threshold comprises using a first range of acceptable rates of false packet detections; and

adjusting the second correlation threshold comprises using a second range of acceptable rates of false packet detections.