Integrated system for software application development

• US 10,248,387 B2
• Filed: 03/15/2018
• Issued: 04/02/2019
• Est. Priority Date: 09/21/2016
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Shridhar V. Bharthulwar
• Original Assignee: Shridhar V. Bharthulwar
• Inventors: Bharthulwar, Shridhar V.
• Primary Examiner(s): Rivera, Anibal
• Application Number:
  US15/921,896
• Publication Number:
  US 20180210709A1
• Time in Patent Office: 383 Days
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/24 Object-oriented
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/33 Intelligent editors
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/34 Graphical or visual programming
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/36 Software reuse
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/73 Program documentation
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/77 Software metrics
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/103 Workflow collaboration or project management

Abstract

Methods and systems are disclosed for developing a software application through requirements specification, design, effort estimation, assigning and tracking work items, development, testing, collaboration and project management. The system is structured as an integrated software development system allowing for structured, systematic and user friendly set up of requirements specification (including workflow, user interface, business rules and integrations), technical design for UI features and integrations using design patterns, automated effort estimation, automated story card and task creation. The system also provides a novel, audio-video playback capability for workflow visualization. Further, the system provides visual depiction of defects and changed items side-by-side with requirements, as well as predictive modeling of defects that allows for forecasting of defect completion rate. In the preferred embodiment, the system is delivered as a multi-tenant Software as a Service.

Claims

1. A method to develop a software application, the method executed by software instructions stored in a memory and executed by a hardware processor, comprising the steps of:

a. managing communications among several groups who are working on a common software application by providing an interactive subsystem among the team members;

b. defining a process workflow for a plurality of software application features;

c. defining a plurality of user interface (UI) details including UI widgets associated with each step of the process workflow;

d. defining a plurality of requirements specific details associated with a plurality of UI widgets;

e. defining a plurality of business rules, associated with each step of the process workflow;

f. defining a plurality of re-usable technical design patterns for the software application, each design pattern comprising attributes including;

i. name and description;

ii. a plurality of visually organized design components;

iii. a plurality of visually organized program flow steps, each flow step comprising a step number and step description;

iv. a plurality of visually organized arrow shapes depicting program logic invocation;

v. a plurality of file attachments allowing users to add additional data for each pattern; and

g. producing the finished software application by programming and testing the software application according to said requirements and design specifications.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

a. automatically generating from the user defined requirements specifications, an audio-video playback sequence explaining the process workflow with computer generated speech from user defined text for a plurality of UI widgets, and using visual pop-up text elements describing the user interaction with said software application for a plurality of application features, aiding in immediate and effective grasping of the application feature.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

a. automatically generating a requirements specification document for a software application feature, containing user-definable content including;

i. a cover page containing a company logo image and summary information;

ii. a plurality of computer generated images of UI screens and process workflows;

iii. a plurality of text descriptions organized in a table view associated with the UI widgets contained in said UI screens;

iv. a plurality of text descriptions associated with business rules;

v. a plurality of questions in discussions;

vi. a plurality of change history items;

vii. a plurality of associated file attachments;

b. automatically generating a design document for each software application feature, having detailed technical instructions for a programmer to implement the application feature, and containing user-definable content including;

i. a cover page containing a company logo image and summary information;

ii. a plurality of computer generated images of UI screens and process workflow;

iii. a plurality of computer generated images of design diagrams rendered from the associated design pattern for each UI screen;

iv. a plurality of text descriptions organized in a table view associated with the UI widgets contained in said UI screens and containing design information;

v. a plurality of text descriptions associated with design components contained in the said design diagrams;

vi. a plurality of open questions in discussions posted by team members;

vii. a plurality of change history items;

viii. a plurality of associated file attachments;

c. automatically generating a design document for each integration point, having detailed technical instructions for a programmer to implement a plurality of integration interfaces, and containing user-definable content including;

i. a cover page containing a company logo image and summary information;

ii. a computer generated image of the UI screen with text descriptions;

iii. a plurality of computer generated images of design diagrams rendered from associated design pattern for each integration interface;

iv. a plurality of program flow steps describing program flow sequence;

v. a plurality of text descriptions associated with design components contained in said design diagrams;

vi. a plurality of open questions in discussions posted by team members;

vii. a plurality of change history items; and

viii. a plurality of associated file attachments.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

a. visually depicting a plurality of changed items associated with each user interface screen, business rule and integration interfaces, wherein the changes are visually rendered with a color coding scheme that identifies the type of change—

a new item, changed item or deleted item, allowing the user to immediately and effectively grasp the incremental changes made in a user-definable time period; and

b. tracking and visually depicting a plurality of UI widgets deleted by the user, in a separate area of the visual rendering of the UI, to aid in effective understanding of deleted UI widgets from the UI requirements specification.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

a. automatically generating an effort estimate associated with the development of said UI screens and Integration Interfaces, with a user-definable estimation method selected from one of several methods including;

i. calculating effort estimate defined by complexity factors;

ii. calculating effort estimate defined by type of UI widget being developed and type of change (new, modified or deleted);

iii. calculating effort estimate defined by underlying design components in the design pattern wherein the estimate accounts for fixed and variable cost of development wherein the variable cost varies by the number of UI widgets or data fields in the integration interface;

iv. a fixed effort estimate for a task; and

v. calculating effort estimate as a percentage of a related effort.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

a. automatically generating tasks necessary to complete the development by defining and applying task creation templates specifying attributes including;

i. task type selected from a pre-defined list;

ii. name and description;

iii. estimation method;

iv. email notification method upon task completion;

v. whether a review is required to complete the task;

and

b. organizing the automatically generated tasks in status lanes with summary information about said tasks and the ability to update the status of said tasks with navigation controls to move the task to the next or previous status lanes.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

a. automatically generating a plurality of test cases associated with a plurality of requirements specifications for UI widgets and business rules for each UI screen of a plurality of software application features; and

b. limiting the test cases generated based on a user-definable time period or development iteration for constraining the test cases to the changes made to the requirements in the specified time period.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

a. visually depicting defects associated with a UI screen overlaid visually on individual UI widgets with color coded aid for defect severity to aid in immediate and effective identification of open defects;

b. visually depicting defects associated with a process workflow of a software application feature, overlaid visually on individual UI steps with color coded aid for defect severity to aid in immediate and effective identification of open defects across the software feature;

c. visually depicting the planned development iteration number on individual UI steps of a process workflow to aid in immediate and effective identification of project management related information for developing the software feature; and

d. visually depicting the planned development iteration number on a plurality of integration interfaces of an integration point to aid in immediate and effective identification of project management related information for developing the software feature.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

a. calculating the predicted date for closing of defects across the software application by;

i. measuring and tracking defect opening rate over time;

ii. measuring and tracking defect resolution rate over time;

iii. measuring and tracking defect re-opening rate over time;

iv. measuring and tracking the severity mix of the defects over time;

v. projecting out defect open rates and resolution rates for future;

vi. applying the projected open, close and re-open rates to the future and calculating a daily projected inventory of defects; and

vii. calculating the predicted date for defect closure for best case, worst case and expected case scenarios.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

a. searching for user-defined text terms across the entire user defined content in the system, wherein a plurality of results of the text search are displayed in a structure comprising;

i. project where the search result is found;

ii. application feature where the search result is found;

iii. UI screen where the search result is found;

iv. matching element on the UI screen where the search result is found;

v. matching text attribute of the matching element where the search result is found;

vi. matching text within the matching attribute with the search terms highlighted; and

b. allowing users to specify from a plurality of content areas to include in the search results.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

a. automatically generating a user guide for the software application, having detailed instructions for an end-user to use a plurality of application features, and containing generated content including;

i. a cover page containing a company logo image and summary information;

ii. a plurality of computer generated text descriptions for each application feature;

iii. a plurality of computer generated images for UI screens including numbered visual callouts for user interaction with the system; and

iv. a computer generated user step associated with each of the visual callouts.

12. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

a. defining a plurality of data model requirements associated with the software application including data model objects and data model fields, with associated attributes;

b. automatically generating a data dictionary document for the software application, having detailed data model descriptions containing generated content including;

i. a cover page containing a company logo image and summary information;

ii. a plurality of computer generated text descriptions organized in a table view, for the data model objects and fields; and

iii. a plurality of computer generated color coded highlights for custom objects and fields to aid in immediate and effective grasping of custom data model objects and fields.

13. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

a. capturing a plurality of user comments and visually depicting said user comments associated with a UI screen, each user comment optionally associated with a UI widget to aid in immediate and effective identification of user comments.

14. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

a. defining a plurality of re-usable integration points between the software application and other applications or services, each integration point comprising a plurality of integration interfaces, each integration interface comprising an associated design pattern, data fields and business rules.

15. An apparatus having a hardware processor to develop a software application, the apparatus comprising:

a. a computer system comprising a group of computers on the server side, and a plurality of client computers connecting to the server side computers over a distributed network, and wherein the hardware processor is executed for;

b. managing communications among several groups who are working on a common software application functioning to aid software development by providing an interactive visual subsystem among the team members;

c. forming a requirements database functioning to further streamline the creation of the detailed application requirements specifications, said [means for forming a] requirements database including visually defined user story workflows, user interface screens, visually organized user interface widgets, style sheets, and business rules;

d. forming a requirements database functioning to further streamline the creation of the detailed application requirements specifications, said requirements database including integration points between the software application and other applications or services, integration interfaces comprising a plurality of data fields;

e. forming a design database functioning to further streamline the creation of the detailed application design specifications, said [means for forming a] design database including design patterns;

each design pattern comprising design components, program logic flow steps, arrows connecting the design components;

f. selecting a design pattern to be assigned to a UI screen of an application feature functioning to re-use a pre-defined application design pattern;

g. selecting a design pattern to be assigned to an integration interface of an integration point functioning to re-use a pre-defined integration design pattern;

h. assisting the development of the source code program modules using the requirements and design specifications which define the software application functioning to complete a delivery of the software application features; and

i. assisting the testing of the source code program modules using the requirements and design specifications which define the software application functioning to complete a delivery of the software application features.

16. The apparatus of claim 15 further comprising the step of:

a. automatically generating from the user defined requirement specifications, an audio-video playback sequence explaining the process workflow with computer generated speech from user defined text for UI widgets and visual pop-up text elements describing the user interaction with the software application for a plurality of application features, functioning to aid in immediate and effective grasping of the application feature.

17. The apparatus of claim 15 further comprising:

a. automatically generating a detailed requirements document containing a cover page, computer generated diagrams for UI screens, detailed descriptions of UI widget requirements attributes, business rules, notes, change history, file attachments, open questions functioning to aid in effective understanding of the application feature requirements and reducing effort in writing such a document manually;

b. automatically generating a detailed technical design document for an application feature containing a cover page, computer generated UI screen images, computer generated design diagrams, detailed descriptions of design components, notes, change history, file attachments, open questions functioning to aid in effective understanding of the application feature technical design and reducing effort in writing such a document manually; and

c. automatically generating a detailed technical design document for an integration point containing a cover page, computer generated design diagrams, detailed descriptions of design components, notes, change history, file attachments, open questions functioning to aid in effective understanding of the integration point technical design and reducing effort in writing such a document manually.

18. The apparatus of claim 15 further comprising:

a. visually depicting a plurality of changed items associated with each user interface screen, business rule and integration interfaces, wherein the changes are visually rendered with a color coding scheme that identifies the type of change—

a new item, changed item or deleted item, functioning to aid in immediate and effective grasping of the incremental changes made in a user-definable time period; and

b. tracking and visually depicting a plurality of UI widgets deleted by the user, in a separate area of the visual rendering of the UI, to aid in effective understanding of deleted UI widgets from the UI requirements specification.

19. The apparatus of claim 15 further comprising:

a. automatically generating an effort estimate chart associated with the development of said UI screens and Integration Interfaces, functioning to create an accurate effort estimate and lower the labor cost of manual estimation, with a user-definable estimation method selected from one of several methods including;

i. calculating effort estimate defined by complexity factors;

ii. calculating effort estimate defined by type of UI widget being developed and type of change (new, modified or deleted);

iii. calculating effort estimate defined by underlying design components in the design pattern wherein the estimate accounts for fixed and variable cost of development wherein the variable cost varies by the number of UI widgets or data fields in the integration interface;

iv. a fixed effort estimate for a task; and

v. calculating effort estimate as a percentage of a related effort.

20. The apparatus of claim 15 further comprising:

a. automatically generating tasks necessary to complete the development, functioning to create an accurate task list and lower the labor cost of creating tasks manually, by defining and applying task creation templates specifying attributes including;

i. task type selected from a pre-defined list;

ii. name and description;

iii. estimation method;

iv. email notification method upon task completion;

v. whether a review is required to complete the task;

and

b. organizing visually the automatically generated tasks in status lanes with summary information about said tasks and the ability to update the status of said tasks with navigation controls to move the task to the next or previous status lanes, functioning to aid in immediate and effective grasp of project management related aspects.

21. The apparatus of claim 15 further comprising:

a. automatically generating a plurality of test cases associated with a plurality of requirements specifications for UI widgets and business rules for each UI screen of a plurality of software application features, functioning to improve the accuracy of test cases and lower the cost from manual creation of test cases; and

b. limiting the test cases generated based on a user-definable time period or development iteration for constraining the test cases to the changes made to the requirements in the specified time period, functioning to aid in incremental, iterative development.

22. The apparatus of claim 15 further comprising:

a. visually depicting defects associated with a UI screen overlaid visually on individual UI widgets with color coded aid for defect severity, functioning to aid in immediate and effective identification of open defects;

b. visually depicting defects associated with a process workflow of a software application feature, overlaid visually on individual UI steps with color coded aid for defect severity, functioning to aid in immediate and effective identification of open defects across the software feature;

c. visually depicting the planned development iteration on individual UI steps of a process workflow, functioning to aid in immediate and effective identification of project management related information for developing the software feature; and

d. visually depicting the planned development iteration on a plurality of integration interfaces of an integration point, functioning to aid in immediate and effective identification of project management related information for developing the software feature.

23. The apparatus of claim 15 further comprising:

a. calculating the predicted date for closing of defects across the software application, functioning to aid in improved visibility of project status by;

i. measuring and tracking defect opening rate over time;

ii. measuring and tracking defect resolution rate over time;

iii. measuring and tracking defect re-opening rate over time;

iv. measuring and tracking the severity mix of the defects over time;

v. projecting out defect open rates and resolution rates for future;

vi. applying the projected open, close and re-open rates to the future and calculating a daily projected inventory of defects; and

vii. calculating the predicted date for defect closure for best case, worst case and expected case scenarios.

24. The apparatus of claim 15 further comprising:

a. searching for user-defined text terms across the entire user defined content in the system, functioning to quickly locate items of interest wherein a plurality of results of the text search are displayed in a structure comprising;

i. project where the search result is found;

ii. application feature where the search result is found;

iii. UI screen where the search result is found;

iv. matching element on the UI screen where the search result is found;

v. matching text attribute of the matching element where the search result is found;

vi. matching text within the matching attribute with the search terms highlighted; and

b. allowing users to specify from a plurality of content areas to include in the search results, functioning to limit the scope of the text search.

25. A method to develop a software application, the method executed by software instructions stored in a memory and executed by a hardware processor, comprising the steps of:

a. managing communications among several groups who are working on a common software application by providing an interactive subsystem among team members;

b. defining a process workflow for a plurality of software application features;

c. defining a plurality of user interface (UI) details including UI widgets associated with each step of the process workflow;

d. defining a plurality of requirements specific details including playback text associated with a plurality of UI widgets;

e. automatically generating from the user defined requirements specifications, an audio-video playback sequence explaining the process workflow with computer generated speech from user defined text for a plurality of UI widgets, and using visual pop-up text elements describing the user interaction with said software application for a plurality of application features, aiding in immediate and effective grasping of the application feature; and

f. producing the finished software application by programming and testing the software application according to said requirements and design specifications.