Computer systems and methods for governing a network of data platforms

• US 10,291,733 B2
• Filed: 09/16/2016
• Issued: 05/14/2019
• Est. Priority Date: 09/17/2015
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Uptake Technologies, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Uptake Technologies, Inc.
• Inventors: Goldstein, Michael, Hansmann, Will, Ravensberg, Tom, Kolb, Jason
• Primary Examiner(s): Wasel, Mohamed A
• Application Number:
  US15/268,354
• Publication Number:
  US 20170085627A1
• Time in Patent Office: 970 Days
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/10 for controlling access to devices or network resources
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/102 Entity profiles
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/10 in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network software deployment G06F8/60; multiprogramming arrangements G06F9/46
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/55 Push-based network services

Abstract

In an environment where a plurality of data platforms are communicatively coupled via a communication network, one platform in the environment may govern whether other platforms in the environment are permitted to participate in the sharing of asset-related information. For example, a first platform may receive, from a second platform (e.g., a master or seed platform) that is communicatively coupled to the first platform via the communication network, criteria that governs whether the first platform is permitted to share asset-related data with one or more other platforms in the network. In turn, the first platform may assess the reliability of the platform'"'"'s stored asset-related data and then apply the criteria to the assessed reliability to determine whether the first platform is permitted to share asset-related data with the one or more other platforms and then operate in accordance with that determination.

Claims

1. In a system comprising a plurality of platforms that are communicatively coupled via a communication network, a computer-implemented method comprising:

receiving, at a first platform from a second platform that is communicatively coupled to the first platform via the communication network, criteria that governs whether the first platform is permitted to share asset-related data with one or more other platforms in the system, wherein the criteria is based on the reliability of asset-related data stored at a platform, wherein the first and second platforms are each configured to receive, process, and store respective asset-related data, and wherein the first and second platforms are each associated with a different respective organization;

the first platform assessing the reliability of asset-related data stored at the first platform by considering at least one of (a) how successful the first platform was in mapping given asset-related data stored at the first platform to a data model or (b) which data fields were present in the given asset-related data after data mapping;

the first platform applying the received criteria to the assessed reliability of asset-related data stored at the first platform and thereby making a determination as to whether the first platform is permitted to share asset-related data with the one or more other platforms; and

the first platform operating in accordance with the determination.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein assessing the reliability of asset-related data stored at the first platform by considering at least one of (a) how successful the first platform was in mapping the given asset-related data to a data model or (b) which data fields were present in the given asset-related data after data mapping comprises:

assessing the reliability of asset-related data stored at the first platform by one or both of (a) determining an extent of the given asset-related data that was successfully mapped to a given data model or (b) determining an extent of the given asset-related data that includes a set of preferred data fields after data mapping.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein making a determination as to whether the first platform is permitted to share asset-related data with one or more other platforms in the system comprises making a determination that the first platform is permitted to share asset-related data with the one or more other platforms.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, wherein the first platform operating in accordance with the determination comprises at least one of (a) the first platform beginning to share asset-related data with the one or more other platforms or (b) the first platform notifying the one or more other platforms that the first platform is permitted to share asset-related data.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein making a determination as to whether the first platform is permitted to share asset-related data with one or more other platforms in the system comprises making a determination that the first platform is not permitted to share asset-related data with the one or more other platforms.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5, wherein the first platform operating in accordance with the determination comprises:

the first platform disabling its ability to share asset-related data to the one or more platforms.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving, at the first platform from the second platform, logic that dictates the manner in which the first platform is to process asset-related data; and

the first platform operating in accordance with the received logic.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 7, wherein the logic comprises a data model to be used by the first platform to map incoming asset-related data.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 7, wherein the logic comprises a data analysis rule to be applied to incoming asset-related data by the first platform.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the second platform comprises a master platform for the system.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the given asset-related data comprises asset-related data received from a given data source.

12. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon that are executable to cause a first platform to:

receive, from a second platform that is communicatively coupled to the first platform via a communication network, criteria that governs whether the first platform is permitted to share asset-related data with one or more other platforms that are communicatively coupled to the first platform via the communication network, wherein the criteria is based on the reliability of asset-related data stored at a platform, wherein the first and second platforms are each configured to receive, process, and store respective asset-related data, and wherein the first and second platforms are each associated with a different respective organization;

assess the reliability of asset-related data stored at the first platform by considering at least one of (a) how successful the first platform was in mapping given asset-related data to a data model or (b) which data fields were present in the given asset-related data after data mapping;

apply the received criteria to the assessed reliability of asset-related data stored at the first platform and thereby make a determination as to whether the first platform is permitted to share asset-related data with the one or more other platforms; and

operate in accordance with the determination.

13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12, wherein the instructions that are executable to cause the first platform to assess the reliability of asset-related data stored at the first platform by considering at least one of (a) how successful the first platform was in mapping the given asset-related data to a data model or (b) which data fields were present in the given asset-related data after data mapping comprise instructions that are executable to cause the first platform to assess the reliability of asset-related data stored at the first platform by one or both of (a) determining an extent of the given asset-related data that was successfully mapped to a given data model or (b) determining an extent of the given asset-related data that includes a set of preferred data fields after data mapping.

14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12, wherein the instructions that are executable to cause the first platform to make the determination as to whether the first platform is permitted to share asset-related data with the one or more other platforms comprise instructions that are executable to cause the first platform to make a determination that the first platform is permitted to share asset-related data with the one or more other platforms.

15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14, wherein the instructions that are executable to cause the first platform to operate in accordance with the determination comprise at least one of (a) instructions that are executable to cause the first platform to begin sharing asset-related data with the one or more other platforms or (b) instructions that are executable to cause the first platform to notify the one or more other platforms that the first platform is permitted to share asset-related data.

16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14, wherein the instructions that are executable to cause the first platform to make the determination as to whether the first platform is permitted to share asset-related data with the one or more other platforms comprise instructions that are executable to cause the first platform to make a determination that the first platform is not permitted to share asset-related data with the one or more other platforms, and wherein the instructions that are executable to cause the first platform to operate in accordance with the determination comprise instructions that are executable to cause the first platform to disable its ability to share asset-related data to the one or more platforms.

17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12, further comprising instructions that are executable to cause the first platform to:

receive, from the second platform, logic that dictates the manner in which the first platform is to process asset-related data; and

operate in accordance with the received logic.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the logic comprises one of a data model to be used by the first platform to map incoming asset-related data or a data analysis rule to be applied to incoming asset-related data by the first platform.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12, wherein the given asset-related data comprises asset-related data received from a given data source.

19. A first platform comprising:

a network interface configured to facilitate communication with one or more data sources and one or more other platforms via a communication network;

at least one processor;

a non-transitory computer-readable medium; and

program instructions stored on the non-transitory computer-readable medium that are executable by the at least one processor to cause the first platform to;

receive, from a second platform that is communicatively coupled to the first platform via the communication network, criteria that governs whether the first platform is permitted to share asset-related data with one or more other platforms that are communicatively coupled to the first platform via the communication network, wherein the criteria is based on the reliability of asset-related data stored at a platform, wherein the first and second platforms are each configured to receive, process, and store respective asset-related data, and wherein the first and second platforms are each associated with a different respective organization;

assess the reliability of asset-related data stored at the first platform by considering at least one of (a) how successful the first platform was in mapping given asset-related data to a data model or (b) which data fields were present in the given asset-related data after data mapping;

apply the received criteria to the assessed reliability of asset-related data stored at the first platform and thereby make a determination as to whether the first platform is permitted to share asset-related data with the one or more other platforms; and

operate in accordance with the determination.