Battery state-of-health determination using multi-factor normalization

• US 10,302,709 B2
• Filed: 11/30/2016
• Issued: 05/28/2019
• Est. Priority Date: 11/30/2016
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Cadex Electronics Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Cadex Electronics Incorporated
• Inventors: Shoa Hassani Lashidani, Tina, Yeung, Arnold
• Primary Examiner(s): Park, Hyun D
• Application Number:
  US15/364,682
• Publication Number:
  US 20180149708A1
• Time in Patent Office: 909 Days
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 31/367 Software therefor, e.g. for battery testing using modelling or look-up tables
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 31/392 Determining battery ageing or deterioration, e.g. state of health

Abstract

A battery is subjected to a discharge current pulse that is normalized to its capacity. The battery voltage is measured before, during and after the pulse, and various parameters are calculated therefrom. The parameters are adjusted depending on both the value of the nominal or maximum cut-off voltage of the battery and on its open circuit voltage prior to the pulse. Based on the open circuit voltage, one of multiple different analysis paths is selected, each representing a different state of charge range. The analysis selected involves a comparison of the adjusted parameters with a set of thresholds that are specific to the selected analysis and that depend on the desired cut-off point between good and poor state of health. Batteries of different nominal voltages, capacities and chemistries can be tested without knowing their state of charge and without the tester having been calibrated for a specific battery model.

Claims

1. A method for determining a state of health (SoH) of a battery, comprising:

connecting the battery to a tester comprising a user interface, a voltage sensor, a load and a processor;

receiving, in the tester via the user interface, a nominal or maximum cut-off voltage of the battery;

receiving, in the tester via the user interface, a capacity of the battery;

measuring, by the voltage sensor of the tester, an initial OCV (open circuit voltage) V1 of the battery;

drawing, by the load, a pulse of current from the battery to the tester, said pulse having an amplitude that is normalized to the capacity;

measuring, by the processor, a voltage response of the battery to the pulse;

selecting, from a plurality of OCV regions, by the processor, an OCV region that V1 lies in, wherein each OCV region has an associated, different set of thresholds, and each OCV region corresponds to a different initial state of charge range for the battery;

adjusting, by the processor, the voltage response using the nominal or maximum cut-off voltage and using the selected OCV region;

comparing, by the processor, said adjusted response to at least one of the thresholds associated with the selected OCV region; and

determining, by the processor using said comparison, whether the SoH is above or below a predefined cut-off value.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein:

the voltage response is processed into a plurality of parameters;

the voltage response is adjusted by adjusting the parameters; and

said comparison is performed by comparing the adjusted parameters to said at least one of the thresholds.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the parameters comprise:

a first parameter P1 defined by subtracting from V1 a voltage V4 measured at the end of a recovery period that follows the pulse;

a second parameter P2 defined by subtracting a voltage V3 measured at the beginning of the recovery period from a voltage V2 measured at the end of the pulse; and

a third parameter P3 defined by subtracting V2 from V1.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein:

the SoH is good if the SoH is above the cut-off value and poor if the SoH is below the cut-off value;

there are three OCV regions;

if V1 is above a first value, a first OCV region is selected;

if V2 is not above the first value but V2 is above a second value, a second OCV region is selected;

if V2 is not above the second value, the third OCV region is selected;

if the first OCV region is selected;

if P1 is below a first threshold, the SoH is good;

if P1 is above a second threshold that is higher than the first threshold, the SoH is poor; and

if P1 is between the first and second thresholds, then if P2 is greater than a third threshold and P3 is less than a fourth threshold, the SoH is good, otherwise the SoH is poor;

if the second OCV region is selected;

if P3 is less than a fifth threshold, the SoH is good;

if P3 is greater than a sixth threshold that is greater than the fifth threshold, the SoH is poor; and

if P3 is between the fifth and sixth thresholds and P2 is greater than a seventh threshold, then the SoH is good, otherwise the SoH is poor; and

if the third OCV region is selected;

if P3 is less than a eighth threshold, the SoH is good;

if P3 is greater than a ninth threshold that is greater than the eight threshold, the SoH is poor; and

if P3 is between the eight and ninth thresholds and P2 is greater than a tenth threshold, then the SoH is good, otherwise the SoH is poor.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the pulse is followed by a recovery period during which no current is drawn from the battery and the voltage response is measured, and which has a duration long enough for a rate of change of the voltage response to fall below 0.1 mV/s.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the pulse is a square pulse and the magnitude of the pulse is proportional to the capacity.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein there are three OCV regions, each corresponding to a different initial state of charge range for the battery.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein measuring the voltage response comprises measuring:

a voltage V2 measured at the end of the pulse;

a voltage V3 measured at the beginning of a recovery period that follows the pulse; and

a voltage V4 measured at the end of the recovery period.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein V1 is measured within one second before the pulse.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein:

V2 is measured within a last second of the pulse;

V3 is measured within one second after the pulse; and

V4 is measured within a last second of the recovery period.

11. The method of claim 8, wherein the pulse has a duration of 1 minute and the recovery period has a duration of 3 minutes.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the pulse is sinusoidal.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein:

the voltage response is measured in a frequency domain;

at least one parameter is calculated from the response that relates to a resistive response of the battery;

at least one further parameter is calculated from the response that relates to a reactive response of the battery.

14. The method of claim 1, further comprising normalizing the response to a temperature of the battery.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein said comparison is performed by an inference system or a neural network.

16. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving, by the tester, an input that specifies the cut-off value, wherein each set of thresholds has values that depend on the specified cut-off value.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the tester outputs to the user interface an indication that the battery is:

good if the SoH is above the cut-off value;

or

poor if the SoH is below the cut-off value.

18. A device for determining state of health (SoH) of a battery, comprising:

a connection to a battery to be tested;

a user interface configured to receive a nominal or maximum cut-off voltage of the battery and a capacity of the battery;

a voltage sensor to detect an initial OCV (open circuit voltage) V1 of the battery;

a load configured to draw a pulse of current from the battery, said pulse having an amplitude that is normalized to the capacity; and

a processor configured to;

obtain a voltage response of the battery to the pulse;

select, from a plurality of OCV regions, an OCV region that V1 lies in, wherein each OCV region has an associated, different set of thresholds, and each OCV region corresponds to a different initial state of charge range for the battery;

adjust the voltage response using the nominal or maximum cut-off voltage and using the selected OCV region;

compare said adjusted response to at least one of the thresholds associated with the selected OCV region; and

determine, using said comparison, whether the SoH is above or below a predefined cut-off value.

19. The device of claim 18, wherein:

the amplitude of the pulse is proportional to the capacity;

the pulse is a square pulse followed by a recovery period during which no current is drawn from the battery and the voltage response is measured;

there are three OCV regions;

the voltage response is processed into;

a first parameter defined by subtracting from V1 a voltage V4 measured at the end of a recovery period that follows the pulse;

a second parameter defined by subtracting a voltage V3 measured at the beginning of the recovery period from a voltage V2 measured at the end of the pulse; and

a third parameter defined by subtracting V2 from V1;

the voltage response is adjusted by adjusting the parameters; and

said comparison is performed by comparing the adjusted parameters to said at least one of the thresholds.

20. The device of claim 18, wherein the processor is further configured to output to the user interface an indication that the SoH is:

good if the SoH is above the cut-off value;

or

poor if the SoH is below the cut-off value.