Automatic selection of media representations

• US 10,303,692 B2
• Filed: 01/22/2015
• Issued: 05/28/2019
• Est. Priority Date: 06/24/2008
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC (Microsoft Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC (Microsoft Corporation)
• Inventors: Klemets, Anders E, Larkin, Kevin P
• Primary Examiner(s): Beausoliel, Jr., Robert W
• Assistant Examiner(s): Khakhar, Nirav K
• Application Number:
  US14/602,934
• Publication Number:
  US 20150134674A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,587 Days
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/24578 using ranking
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/41 Indexing; Data structures therefor; Storage structures
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/48 Retrieval characterised by using metadata, e.g. metadata not derived from the content or metadata generated manually
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/58 Retrieval characterised by using metadata, e.g. metadata not derived from the content or metadata generated manually
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/68 Retrieval characterised by using metadata, e.g. metadata not derived from the content or metadata generated manually
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/70 of video data

Abstract

Technologies for selecting a media representation out of a plurality of representations of the same media offered by a media provider wherein the selected representation is a preferred representation and the selecting is based on metadata of the media representations evaluated against scoring criteria.

Claims

1. A method performed on a computing device that includes at least one processor, memory, and a universal plug and play (“

UPnP”

) control point, the method comprising;

evaluating, by the UPnP control point, metadata associated with a plurality of representations of a particular media content including one or more of images, movies, or music;

using the evaluation, determining an encoding bit rate for each representation;

using the evaluation, determining whether or not each representation is transcoded;

ranking, by the UPnP control point, each representation of the plurality of representations of the particular media content, based on scoring applied to the determinations for the encoding bit rate and whether each representation is transcoded;

selecting, by the UPnP control point based on the ranking, at least one of the ranked representations of the particular media content;

operating the computing device to manage utilization of available networking resources to download the particular media content within the selected representations, in which the evaluated metadata associated with the plurality of representations is utilized to select the at least one representation that is supported by the computing device or a target renderer; and

rendering the selected and supported representation using the target renderer.

2. The method of claim 1 where the scoring criteria includes a comparison of the encoding bit rate for each representation to a throughput rate of a link providing the each representation.

3. The method of claim 1 where the scoring criteria further includes an indication of whether or not a multipurpose internet mail extensions (“

MIME”

) content type of each representation is supported by the target renderer, or where the scoring criteria further includes an indication of whether or not a digital living network alliance (“

DLNA”

) profile identifier (“

ID”

) of each representation is supported by the target renderer.

4. The method of claim 1 where the scoring criteria further includes an indication of whether or not a real-time streaming protocol (“

RTSP”

) is supported by the target renderer.

5. The method of claim 1 where the scoring criteria further includes an indication of whether or not a provider of each representation supports seeking.

6. The method of claim 1 where the scoring criteria further includes an indication of whether or not a hypertext transfer protocol (“

HTTP”

) is supported by the target renderer.

7. The method of claim 1 further comprising resolving, in response to the ranking, any ties between two or more equally highest ranking representations of the plurality of representations of the particular media content.

8. A system comprising a computing device and at least one program module that are together configured for performing actions, the computing device including at least one processor, memory, and a universal plug and play (“

UPnP”

) control point, the actions comprising;

evaluating, by the UPnP control point, metadata associated with a plurality of representations of a particular media content including one or more of images, movies, or music;

using the evaluation, determining an encoding bit rate for each representation;

using the evaluation, determining whether or not each representation is transcoded;

ranking, by the UPnP control point, each representation of the plurality of representations of the particular media content based on scoring criteria applied to the determinations for the encoding bit rate and whether each representation is transcoded; and

selecting, by the UPnP control point based on the ranking, at least one of the ranked representations of the particular media content;

operating the computing device to manage utilization of available networking resources to download the particular media content within the selected representations in which the evaluated metadata associated with the plurality of representations is utilized to select the at least one representation that is supported by the computing device or a target renderer; and

rendering the selected and supported representation using the target renderer.

9. The system of claim 8 where the scoring criteria includes a comparison of the encoding bit rate of each representation to a throughput rate of a link providing the each representation.

10. The system of claim 8 where the scoring criteria further includes an indication of whether or not a multipurpose internet mail extensions (“

MIME”

) content type of each representation is supported by the target renderer, or where the scoring criteria further includes an indication of whether or not a digital living network alliance (“

DLNA”

) profile identifier (“

ID”

) of each representation is supported by the target renderer.

11. The system of claim 8 where the scoring criteria further includes an indication of whether or not a real-time streaming protocol (“

RTSP”

) is supported by the target renderer.

12. The system of claim 8 where the scoring criteria further includes an indication of whether or not a provider of each representation supports seeking.

13. The system of claim 8 where the scoring criteria further includes an indication of whether or not a hypertext transfer protocol (“

HTTP”

) is supported by the target renderer.

14. The system of claim 8, the actions further comprising resolving, in response to the ranking, any ties between two or more equally highest ranking representations of the plurality of representations of the particular media content.

15. At least one non-transitory hardware computer storage device that includes computer-executable instructions that, based on execution by a processor of a computing device that includes memory and a universal plug and play (“

UPnP”

) control point, configure the computing device to perform actions comprising;

evaluating, by the UPnP control point, metadata associated with a plurality of representations of a particular media content including one or more of images, movies, or music;

using the evaluation, determining an encoding bit rate for each representation;

using the evaluation, determining whether or not each representation is transcoded;

ranking, by the UPnP control point, each representation of the plurality of representations of the particular media content based on scoring criteria applied to the determinations for the encoding bit rate and whether each representation is transcoded;

selecting, by the UPnP control point based on the ranking, at least one of the ranked representations of the particular media content;

operating the computing device to manage utilization of available networking resources to download the particular media content within the selected representations in which the evaluated metadata associated with the plurality of representations is utilized to select the at least one representation that is supported by the computing device or a target renderer; and

rendering the selected and supported representation using the target renderer.

16. The at least one non-transitory hardware computer storage device of claim 15 where the scoring criteria includes a comparison of the encoding bit rate of each representation to a throughput rate of a link providing the each representation.

17. The at least one non-transitory hardware computer storage device of claim 15 where the scoring criteria further includes an indication of whether or not a multipurpose internet mail extensions (“

MIME”

) content type of each representation is supported by the target renderer, or where the scoring criteria further includes an indication of whether or not a digital living network alliance (“

DLNA”

) profile identifier (“

ID”

) of each representation is supported by the target renderer.

18. The at least one non-transitory hardware computer storage device of claim 15 where the scoring criteria further includes an indication of whether or not a real-time streaming protocol (“

RTSP”

) is supported by the target renderer.

19. The at least one non-transitory hardware computer storage device of claim 15 where the scoring criteria further includes an indication of whether or not a provider of each representation supports seeking, or where the scoring criteria further includes an indication of whether or not a hypertext transfer protocol (“

HTTP”

) is supported by the target renderer.

20. The at least one non-transitory hardware computer storage device of claim 15, the actions further comprising resolving, in response to the ranking, any ties between two or more equally highest ranking representations of the plurality of representations of the particular media content.