Motion activated switch and method

• US 10,316,884 B2
• Filed: 06/20/2016
• Issued: 06/11/2019
• Est. Priority Date: 06/18/2015
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Benjamin N. Demann, Matthew C. Prestwich
• Original Assignee: Benjamin N. Demann, Matthew C. Prestwich
• Inventors: Prestwich, Matthew C., DeMann, Benjamin N.
• Primary Examiner(s): Bauer, Scott
• Application Number:
  US15/187,621
• Publication Number:
  US 20170025233A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,086 Days
• CPC Class Codes: F16B 37/068 by deforming the material of the support, e.g. the sheet or plate
• CPC Class Codes: F16B 5/02 by means of fastening members using screw-thread F16B5/0004 takes precedence; construction of screw-threaded connections F16B25/00 - F16B39/00
• CPC Class Codes: F16B 5/0258 using resiliently deformable sleeves, grommets or inserts F16B43/001 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: F41G 1/35 for illuminating the target , e.g. flash lights
• CPC Class Codes: F41G 11/00 Details of sighting or aiming apparatus; Accessories tools for adjustment of sights F41G1/545
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/017 Gesture based interaction, e.g. based on a set of recognized hand gestures interaction based on gestures traced on a digitiser G06F3/04883

Abstract

An algorithm analyzes the motion of an object to determine if a switch needs to be activated or deactivated. Accelerometers measure forces exerted upon an object to determine orientation in pitch, roll, and yaw axes, and to determine motion of the object. When threshold conditions for these orientations and movements are measured, the method combines taking moving averages of pitch, roll, and yaw, and additionally accumulating an integral of yaw to determine if an activation or deactivation condition is met. Should an integral condition not be constantly met while the moving average conditions are being determined, the yaw integral counter resets and the whole process must begin again. This method balances most unintentional activation conditions with activation latency. Another methodology tracks the motion of a wrist flick, similar to casting a fishing line, using acceleration and deceleration parameters.

Claims

1. A method for controlling a switch, said switch controlling electrical power transmitted to a load and comprising a processor, timer, and three axial accelerometers, each measuring accelerations along an individual axis, the method comprising:

a. setting at least one time interval condition and taking measurements of accelerations along at least one axis every time interval;

b. setting a number of measurements to be averaged into an average acceleration value;

c. repeating acceleration measurements at every time interval, and averaging only the most recent acceleration measurements to obtain new average acceleration values;

d. setting a first, moving average, threshold condition and a second, activation counter, threshold condition and comparing each average acceleration value to a first threshold condition;

e. if the second threshold condition is met by an average acceleration value, incrementing an activation counter and continually adding to the activation counter in the same manner for each subsequent average acceleration value that meets the second threshold condition;

f. if subsequent average accelerations do not meet the second threshold condition, then reducing the activation counter; and

g. only activating the switch if the first threshold condition is met and an activation counter threshold value is reached.

2. The method of claim 1, the axis being used for the activation counter being a different axis than the axis used to determine the moving average.

3. The method of claim 1, the activation counter being incremented by multiplying the average acceleration value by the time increment and accumulating the product of the same in the activation counter.

4. The method of claim 1, the step of reducing the activation counter being a total clearing of the counter to zero.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

h. comparing each average acceleration value to a third threshold condition; and

i. only activating the switch if the first and third threshold conditions are met and a counter threshold value is reached.

6. The method of claim 5, the axis being used for the third threshold condition being a different axis than the axis used to determine the moving average and the activation counter.

7. The method of claim 5, one accelerometer measuring along a pitch axis of the switch, one accelerometer measuring along a yaw axis of the switch and one accelerometer measuring along a roll axis of the switch.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising a deactivation counter keyed to accelerations along at least one deactivation axis.

9. The method of claim 8, the deactivation counter further comprising:

taking measurements of deactivation accelerations along the at least one deactivation axis every time interval;

setting a number of measurements to be averaged into an average deactivation acceleration value;

h. repeating deactivation acceleration measurements at every time interval, and averaging only the most recent deactivation acceleration measurements to obtain new average deactivation acceleration values;

i. if a deactivation threshold condition is met by an average deactivation acceleration value, incrementing a deactivation counter and continually adding to the deactivation counter in the same manner for each subsequent average deactivation acceleration value that meets the deactivation threshold condition;

j. if subsequent average deactivation accelerations do not meet the deactivation threshold condition, then reducing the deactivation counter; and

k. deactivating the switch if the deactivation counter reaches a deactivation counter threshold.

10. The method of claim 9, the deactivation counter being incremented by multiplying the average acceleration value along the at least one deactivation axis by the time increment and accumulating the product of the same in the deactivation counter.

11. The method of claim 9, the step of reducing the deactivation counter being a total clearing of the deactivation counter to zero.

12. The method of claim 9, further comprising:

l. comparing each average deactivation acceleration value to a second, moving average, deactivation threshold condition; and

m. only dectivating the switch if the deactivation threshold condition and the deactivation counter threshold value is reached.

13. The method of claim 12, the axis being used for the deactivation threshold condition being a different axis than the axis used to determine the deactivation counter.

14. The method of claim 1, further comprising at least one alternate activation methodology.

15. The method of claim 14, the at least one alternate activation methodology comprising:

h. establishing at least three sequential checkpoint acceleration thresholds along one axis, at least one being a maximum and at least one being a minimum;

i. determining if a condition precedent is met and then measuring accelerations at predetermined time intervals along the axis and calculating a moving average of those accelerations;

j. comparing the moving average of the acceleration at a given time interval to a moving average of an acceleration for a time interval immediately previous to the given time interval,

k. determining if the moving average of the acceleration for the given time interval has reversed direction as compared to the moving average of the acceleration for the previous interval;

l. determining if the moving average of the acceleration for the given time interval has reached one of the checkpoint thresholds;

m. if the moving average of the acceleration for the given time interval has not reached a checkpoint threshold, then resetting, and if it has reached a checkpoint threshold, continuing to take successive measurements until all the sequential checkpoints are met;

n. activating the switch once all sequential checkpoints are met.

16. The method of claim 15, the axis being the yaw axis.

17. The method of claim 15, the at least three successive checkpoints being selected by the user.

18. The method of claim 15, the at least three successive checkpoints being selected by the processor as a result of practice data from previous activation attempts.

19. The method of claim 15, the alternate activation methodology instead activating a second switch.

20. The method of claim 15, the alternate activation methodology instead being used to deactivate the switch.

21. The method of claim 15, the switch being configurable by a user.

22. The method of claim 15, the switch capable of being configured through a radiofrequency communication processor.