Alerter augmentation system

• US 10,328,946 B2
• Filed: 01/03/2017
• Issued: 06/25/2019
• Est. Priority Date: 01/03/2017
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: GE Global Sourcing LLC (Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation)
• Original Assignee: GE Global Sourcing LLC (Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation)
• Inventors: Brooks, James, Mestha, Lalit Keshav
• Primary Examiner(s): Patton, Spencer D
• Application Number:
  US15/397,545
• Publication Number:
  US 20180186379A1
• Time in Patent Office: 903 Days
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/18 for vehicle drivers or machine operators
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2040/0818 Inactivity or incapacity of driver
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2050/0075 Automatic parameter input, automatic initialising or calibrating means
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2050/143 Alarm means
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2540/221 Physiology, e.g. weight, heartbeat, health or special needs
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2540/223 Posture, e.g. hand, foot, or seat position, turned or inclined
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2540/229 Attention level, e.g. attentive to driving, reading or sleeping
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2556/10 Historical data
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 40/08 related to drivers or passengers
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 50/082 Selecting or switching between different modes of propelling
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 50/14 Means for informing the driver, warning the driver or prompting a driver intervention
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 60/0018 by employing degraded modes, e.g. reducing speed, in response to suboptimal conditions
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 60/0051 from occupants to vehicle
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 60/0053 from vehicle to occupant
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 60/0059 Estimation of the risk associated with autonomous or manual driving, e.g. situation too complex, sensor failure or driver incapacity

Abstract

An alerter augmentation system includes one or more processors that determine an alertness of an operator of a vehicle system. The one or more processors also generate operator input requests that are separated in time by a temporal delay. These input requests seek responses or action by the operator in an attempt to keep or make the operator alert. The one or more processors change one or more of the temporal delay between the input requests and/or a type of the input requests that are generated based at least in part on the alertness of the operator that is determined.

Claims

1. A system comprising:

one or more processors configured to determine an alertness of an operator of a vehicle system, the one or more processors also configured to generate operator input requests that are separated in time by a temporal delay, the one or more processors configured to change one or more of the temporal delay between the input requests or a type of the input requests that are generated based at least in part on the alertness of the operator that is determined,

wherein the one or more processors are configured to automatically switch from automatic control of movement of the vehicle system to manual control of the movement of the vehicle system responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below a first designated threshold score, and

wherein the one or more processors are configured to automatically switch from manual control of the movement of the vehicle system to reduced operation automatic control of the movement of the vehicle system responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below a smaller, second designated threshold score.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors determine the alertness of the operator based on one or more differences between a current operator behavior and a historical operator behavior.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to change the temporal delay between the input requests regardless of a moving speed of the vehicle system.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to change the temporal delay between the input requests by increasing the temporal delay between the successive input requests responsive to the alertness of the operator that is determined indicating that the operator is alert.

5. The system of claim 4, wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine that the alertness of the operator indicates that the operator is alert responsive to the alertness one or more of exceeding the first designated threshold score or increasing from a previously determined alertness.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to change the temporal delay between the successive input requests by decreasing the temporal delay between the successive input requests responsive to the alertness of the operator indicating that the operator is less alert than a previous time.

7. The system of claim 6, wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine that the alertness of the operator indicates that the operator is less alert responsive to the alertness one or more of not exceeding the first designated threshold score or decreasing from a previously determined alertness.

8. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to change the type of the input requests by switching from visually providing the input requests to audibly providing the input requests.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to change the type of the input requests provided by the alerter system by switching from audibly providing the input requests to visually providing the input requests.

10. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to automatically apply a brake of the vehicle system responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below a third designated threshold score.

11. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to change the movement of the vehicle system while the vehicle system is moving responsive to the alertness of the operator changing.

12. A method comprising:

determining an alertness of an operator of a vehicle system using a monitoring system;

changing one or more of a temporal delay between successive input requests provided by an alerter system of the vehicle system or a type of the input requests provided by the alerter system based at least in part on the alertness of the operator that is determined;

automatically switching the vehicle system from automatic movement control to manual movement control responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below a first designated threshold score, and

automatically switching from the manual movement control of the vehicle system to reduced operation of the automatic movement control of the vehicle system responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below a smaller, second designated threshold score.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the alertness of the operator is determined based on one or more differences between a current operator behavior and a historical operator behavior.

14. The method of claim 12, wherein changing the temporal delay between the successive input requests occurs regardless of a moving speed of the vehicle system.

15. The method of claim 12, wherein changing the temporal delay between the successive input requests includes increasing the temporal delay between the successive input requests responsive to the alertness of the operator that is determined indicating that the operator is alert.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the alertness of the operator indicates that the operator is alert when the alertness as determined by the monitoring system one or more of exceeds the first designated threshold score or increases from a previously determined alertness.

17. The method of claim 12, further comprising changing movement of the vehicle system while the vehicle system is moving responsive to the alertness of the operator changing.

18. A system comprising:

one or more processors configured to automatically instruct an alerter system to generate requests for operator input at time intervals in order to maintain an alertness of an operator controlling a powered system, the one or more processors also configured to direct the alerter system to one or more of change the time intervals between the requests or change a type of the requests responsive to a change in the alertness of the operator,

wherein the one or more processors are configured to automatically switch from automatic control of movement of the powered system to manual control of the movement of the powered system responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below a first designated threshold score, and

wherein the one or more processors are configured to automatically switch from manual control of the movement of the powered system to reduced operation automatic control of the movement of the powered system responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below a smaller, second designated threshold score.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein the one or more processors are configured to direct the alerter system to increase a time delay between successive requests for operator input responsive to the alertness of the operator increasing and to direct the alerter system to decrease the time delay responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing.

20. The system of claim 18, wherein the one or more processors are configured to change the movement of the powered system while the powered system is moving responsive to the alertness of the operator changing.