Geographic locale mapping system

• US 10,332,223 B1
• Filed: 06/03/2015
• Issued: 06/25/2019
• Est. Priority Date: 06/06/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: MMSR, LLC
• Original Assignee: MMSR, LLC
• Inventors: Mauseth, Michael J., Roe, Steve, Sweezey, Jason
• Primary Examiner(s): Gills, Kurtis
• Application Number:
  US14/729,378
• Time in Patent Office: 1,483 Days
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/00 Administration; Management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/16 Real estate

Abstract

The disclosed technology facilitates objective comparisons between different geographical locales based on statistical comparisons of associated distributions of locale attributes. According to one implementation, a method disclosed herein includes defining a benchmark cluster having a first distribution of locale attributes; identifying a plurality of locale clusters that each correspond to one of a number of locales within a search zone associated with a different distribution of the locale attributes; assessing satisfaction of a similarity condition by comparing the benchmark cluster and to one or more of the identified locale clusters; and outputting one or more of the locales corresponding to the identified locale clusters satisfying the similarity condition.

Claims

1. A method for managing data for geographic locale mapping, the method comprising:

associating in a database a different geographic locale with each one of multiple locale clusters that are individually defined by a distribution of locale attributes;

associating in the database each one of the multiple locale clusters with a select one of multiple predefined cluster types, the predefined cluster types being derived in a clustering analysis of the locale attributes for the multiple locale clusters and each classifying a subgroup of the multiple locale clusters having locale attributes with a demonstrated correlation to one another;

determining, with a processor, a benchmark cluster type based on inputs received from a user interface, the benchmark cluster type being one of the multiple predefined cluster types classifying locale clusters in a database;

identifying a subset of the locale clusters in the database that correspond to a user-specified search zone and that are also classified in the database in association with the benchmark cluster type, the user-specified search zone being associated with locales corresponding to a plurality of the multiple predefined cluster types; and

outputting one or more geographic locales corresponding to the identified subset of the locale clusters.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises:

receiving a benchmark locale;

determining the benchmark cluster type based on the benchmark locale;

outputting an ordered ranking of the one or more geographic locales corresponding to the identified subset of the locale clusters, the ranking defining relative similarity of the benchmark locale to each of the geographic locales in the ordered ranking.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving user input including the search zone and information for determining the benchmark cluster type.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the benchmark cluster type is determined based on one or more locale attributes indicated via the user input.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving user input including the search zone and a benchmark locale, the benchmark locale associated in a memory location with the benchmark cluster type.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the multiple predefined cluster types is defined based on a subset of predictive attributes identified from the locale attributes.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein defining the benchmark cluster type further comprises selecting a predefined cluster type stored in memory in association with a benchmark locale specified by user input.

24. The method of claim 1, wherein identifying the subset of the locale clusters in the database that correspond to the user-specified search zone is performed without computing a metric to compare one or more locale clusters to the benchmark cluster.

8. A system for geographic locale mapping and cluster data management, the system comprising:

memory;

a processor;

a database stored in the memory, the database associating a different geographic locale with each one of multiple locale cluster that are individually defined by a distribution of locale attributes and further associating each one of the multiple locale clusters with a select one of multiple predefined cluster types, the predefined cluster types being derived in a clustering analysis of the locale attributes for the multiple locale clusters and each classifying a subgroup of the multiple locale clusters having locale attributes with a demonstrated correlation to one another;

a benchmark cluster identifier stored in the memory and executable by the processor, the benchmark cluster identifier configured to identify a benchmark cluster type based on user input received through a user interface, the benchmark cluster type being one of multiple predefined cluster types classifying locale clusters in a database; and

a locale characterization and comparison (LCC) engine stored in the memory and executable by the processor, the LCC engine configured to;

identify a subset of the locale clusters in the database that correspond to a user-specified search zone and that are also classified in the database in association with the benchmark cluster type, the user-specified search zone being associated with locales corresponding to a plurality of multiple different predefined cluster types; and

output one or more geographic locales corresponding to the identified subset of the locale clusters.

9. The system of claim 8, wherein the LCC engine outputs an ordered ranking of the one or more geographic locales corresponding to the identified subset of the locale clusters, the ranking defining relative similarity between a user-specified benchmark locale and each of the geographic locales in the ordered ranking.

10. The system of claim 8, wherein the benchmark cluster identifier identifies the benchmark cluster type based on a prioritization awarded to one or more locale attributes indicated via the user input.

11. The system of claim 8, wherein the user input specifies the search zone.

12. The system of claim 8, wherein the user input includes a benchmark locale that is associated in memory with the benchmark cluster type and a distribution of locale attributes.

13. The system of claim 8, wherein each of the multiple predefined cluster types is defined based on a subset of predictive attributes identified from the locale attributes.

14. The system of claim 8, wherein the benchmark cluster type is stored in memory in association with at least one benchmark locale and the user specifies the at least one benchmark locale in the user input.

15. A method for data management and geographical locale mapping, the method comprising:

defining, via a graphical user interface, a geographical search zone and information for selecting a benchmark distribution of locale attributes for comparison to actual distributions of locale attributes for locales within the geographical search zone; and

receiving, in the graphical user interface, the at least one geographical location within the search zone having a distribution of locale attributes that satisfies a similarity condition with the benchmark distribution of locale attributes.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein defining the information for selecting the benchmark distribution of locale attributes further comprises:

specifying a benchmark locale that is associated in a memory location with the benchmark distribution of locale attributes.

17. The method of claim 15, wherein the at least one geographical location includes multiple geographical locations and receiving the at least one geographical location further comprises:

receiving an ordered ranking of the multiple geographical locations, the ranking indicating relative similarity of the benchmark distribution of locale attributes and distributions of locale attributes associated with each of the multiple geographical locations.

18. The method of claim 15, wherein defining the information for selecting the benchmark distribution of locale attributes further comprises:

supplying criterion for prioritizing one or more of the locale attributes.

19. A method for classifying geographical locales based on associated multi-dimensional distributions of locale attributes to provide objective comparison of two or more of the classified locales, the method comprising:

analyzing the associated distributions of locale attributes to identify a predictive subset of the locale attributes;

defining a number of locale cluster types based on the predictive subset of the locale attributes; and

classifying each of the locales as one of the defined locale cluster types.

20. The method of claim 19 further comprising:

plotting a sum of square distances curve for the distributions of locale attributes; and

identifying the locale cluster types based on locale maximum or minimum on the plotted curve.

21. One or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media encoding computer-executable instructions for executing on a computer system a computer process comprising:

associating in a database a different geographic locale with each one of multiple locale clusters that are individually defined by a distribution of locale attributes;

associating in the database each one of the multiple locale clusters with a select one of multiple predefined cluster types, the predefined cluster types being derived in a clustering analysis of the locale attributes for the multiple locale clusters and each classifying a subgroup of the multiple locale clusters having locale attributes with a demonstrated correlation to one another;

determining a plurality of benchmark clusters corresponding to different geographical locales in a first geographical zone, each benchmark cluster associated with one of the multiple predefined cluster types;

determining a plurality of comparison clusters corresponding to different geographical locales in a second geographical zone, each comparison cluster associated in the database with one of the multiple predefined cluster types;

individually comparing each of the benchmark clusters to each of the comparison clusters; and

for each of the benchmark clusters, outputting one or more of the comparison clusters associated with a same one the multiple predefined cluster types as the corresponding benchmark cluster.

22. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 21, wherein the first geographical zone and the second geographical zone are defined by user input.

23. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 21, further comprising:

outputting a map that pairs each of the locales in the first geographical zone with one of the locales in the second geographical zone.