Method and system for rule-based display of sets of images

• US 10,373,368 B2
• Filed: 01/12/2018
• Issued: 08/06/2019
• Est. Priority Date: 03/15/2013
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: PME IP Pty., Ltd.
• Original Assignee: PME IP Pty., Ltd.
• Inventors: Westerhoff, Malte, Stalling, Detlev
• Primary Examiner(s): Sajous, Wesner
• Application Number:
  US15/870,681
• Publication Number:
  US 20180137672A1
• Time in Patent Office: 571 Days
• Field of Search: 345424
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/055 involving electronic [EMR] or nuclear [NMR] magnetic resonance, e.g. magnetic resonance imaging
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 6/032 Transmission computed tomography [CT]
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 6/037 Emission tomography
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 6/465 adapted to display user selection data, e.g. graphical user interface, icons or menus
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 6/466 adapted to display 3D data
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/0481 based on specific properties of the displayed interaction object or a metaphor-based environment, e.g. interaction with desktop elements like windows or icons, or assisted by a cursor's changing behaviour or appearance
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 11/001 Texturing; Colouring; Generation of texture or colour inpainting G06T5/77
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 15/08 Volume rendering
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 19/20 Editing of 3D images, e.g. changing shapes or colours, aligning objects or positioning parts
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 2200/04 involving 3D image data
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 2210/41 Medical
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 2219/2012 Colour editing, changing, or manipulating; Use of colour codes
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 2219/2024 Style variation
• CPC Class Codes: G09G 5/363 Graphics controllers
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 30/20 for handling medical images, e.g. DICOM, HL7 or PACS
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 30/40 for processing medical images, e.g. editing
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/70 for mining of medical data, e.g. analysing previous cases of other patients

Abstract

The invention provides, in some aspects, a system for implementing a rule derived basis to display image sets. In various embodiments of the invention, the selection of the images to be displayed, the layout of the images, as well as the rendering parameters and styles can be determined using a rule derived basis. In an embodiment of the present invention, the user is presented with images displayed based on their preferences without having to first manually adjust parameters.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

(a) receiving a primary Study of a patient selected from a plurality of studies;

(b) identifying a plurality of secondary studies based on the primary Study;

(c) executing on a server digital data processor a render server program which applies one or more Protocol Selection Rules to select a Display Protocol, where the one or more Protocol Selection Rules are based on two or more parameters selected from the group consisting of one or more Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) parameters from the primary Study, one or more Abstract Tags from the primary Study, one or more DICOM parameters from the plurality of secondary studies and one or more Abstract Tags from the plurality of secondary studies, where at least one of the one or more Protocol Selection Rules include a matching clause and a select clause, where the selected Display Protocol is identified by the select clause, where the matching clause is fulfilled by the selected Display Protocol; and

(d) displaying one or more of the plurality of secondary studies identified based on the Display Protocol selected in step (c).

2. The method of claim 1, where the step of displaying in step (d) is carried out on a client display device.

3. The method of claim 1, where at least one study from the plurality of secondary studies displayed in step (d) is a two dimensional (2D) image.

4. The method of claim 1, where at least one study from the plurality of secondary studies displayed in step (d) is a three dimensional (3D) image.

5. The method of claim 4, where the 3D image is displayed in step (d) with a 3D rendering style.

6. The method of claim 1, where at least one of the plurality of secondary studies displayed in step (d) is a volume rendered image.

7. A method comprising:

(a) receiving a primary Study of a patient selected from a plurality of studies;

(b) executing on a server digital data processor a render server program which applies one or more Study Selection Rules to identify a plurality of secondary studies based on two or more parameters selected from the group consisting of one or more Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) parameters from the primary Study, one or more Abstract Tags from the primary Study, one or more DICOM parameters from the plurality of secondary studies and one or more Abstract Tags from the plurality of secondary studies, where the one or more Study Selection Rules restrict the plurality of secondary studies to studies of the patient selected from the plurality of studies, where at least one of the one or more Study Selection Rules include a primary condition and a secondary condition, where the primary condition and the secondary condition are fulfilled by the plurality of secondary studies identified; and

(c) displaying one or more of the plurality of secondary studies identified.

8. The method of claim 7, where the step of displaying in step (c) is carried out on a client display device.

9. The method of claim 7, where at least one study from the plurality of secondary studies displayed in step (c) is a two dimensional (2D) image.

10. The method of claim 7, where at least one study from the one or more of the plurality of secondary studies displayed is a three dimensional (3D) image.

11. The method of claim 10, where the 3D image is displayed in step (c) with a 3D rendering style.

12. The method of claim 7, where at least one of the plurality of secondary studies displayed in step (c) is a volume rendered image.

13. A method comprising:

(a) receiving a primary Study of a patient selected from a plurality of studies;

(b) executing on a server digital data processor a render server program which applies one or more Study Selection Rules to identify a plurality of secondary studies based on prior examinations of the patient;

(c) executing on the server digital data processor the render server program which applies one or more Protocol Selection Rules to select a Display Protocol, where the one or more Protocol Selection Rules are based on two or more parameters selected from the group consisting of one or more Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) parameters from the primary Study, one or more Abstract Tags from the primary Study, one or more DICOM parameters from the plurality of secondary studies and one or more Abstract Tags from the plurality of secondary studies, where at least one of the one or more Protocol Selection Rules includes a matching clause, where the matching clause is fulfilled by the Display Protocol; and

(d) displaying one or more of the plurality of secondary studies identified based on the Display Protocol selected in step (c).

14. The method of claim 13, where the step of displaying in step (d) is carried out on a client display device.

15. The method of claim 13, where at least one study from the plurality of secondary studies displayed in step (d) is a two dimensional (2D) image.

16. The method of claim 13, where at least one study from the plurality of secondary studies displayed in step (d) is a three dimensional (3D) image.

17. The method of claim 16, where the 3D image is displayed in step (d) with a 3D rendering style.

18. The method of claim 16, where at least one of the plurality of secondary studies displayed in step (d) is a volume rendered image.

19. The method of claim 16, where at least one of the plurality of secondary studies is relevant for a diagnosis of the primary Study.

20. The method of claim 16, where at least one of the plurality of secondary studies is a Positron Emission Tomography examination when the primary Study is a Computer Tomography examination.