System and method for evaluation of migration of applications to the cloud

• US 10,379,910 B2
• Filed: 02/27/2018
• Issued: 08/13/2019
• Est. Priority Date: 10/26/2012
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Atos France
• Original Assignee: Syntel Inc (Atos SE)
• Inventors: Balasubramanian, Ashok, Jaiswar, Siddharth, Wani, Harish
• Primary Examiner(s): Srivastava, Vivek
• Assistant Examiner(s): McBeth, William C
• Application Number:
  US15/905,960
• Publication Number:
  US 20180191599A1
• Time in Patent Office: 532 Days
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/60 Software deployment
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/5072 Grid computing
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/5019 Ensuring fulfilment of SLA
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/5096 wherein the managed service relates to distributed or central networked applications
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/14 using software, i.e. software packages network security related monitoring H04L63/1408
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/50 Testing arrangements
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/1433 Vulnerability analysis
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/10 in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network software deployment G06F8/60; multiprogramming arrangements G06F9/46
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/148 Migration or transfer of sessions
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/51 Discovery or management thereof, e.g. service location protocol [SLP] or web services

Abstract

The computer-implemented method for evaluation of migration of application to the cloud evaluates subject applications by executing an application discovery tool to capture application inventory data associated with the subject applications and to store the captured application inventory data. The method analyzes user-defined objectives for application cloud migration obtained via user interface and filters a set of predetermined Cloud Risk Probability (CRISP) categories based on user-defined objectives. The method determines a respective weightage to associate with each of the predetermined CRISP categories for each application. The method generates a CRISP score by applying the determined weightage of each of the set of predetermined CRISP categories in the application inventory data. The method determines respective application fitment scores for each application in the application inventory data based on the generated CRISP score and the historical application cloud migration data.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for the evaluation of a plurality of subject applications for migration to the cloud, the method comprising the steps of:

executing, on at least one or more computers being used by the subject applications, a cloud migration application discovery tool, wherein the cloud migration application discovery tool is configured by way of a first program to capture application inventory data associated with said plurality of subject applications and to store the captured application inventory data in an assessment database;

analyzing, on a separate computer not used by the subject applications, a plurality of user-defined objectives for application cloud migration obtained via a user interface and filtering a set of predetermined cloud risk probability (CRISP) categories based on the user-defined objectives;

determining, via a scoring engine, on the separate computer, a respective weightage to associate with each category of the set of filtered predetermined CRISP categories for each subject application to be assessed for migration to the cloud;

generating a CRISP score for a respective cloud topology by applying the respective weightage associated with each of the set of filtered predetermined CRISP categories to the application inventory data stored in the assessment database; and

determining respective application fitment scores for each subject application associated with the application inventory data based on the generated CRISP score and historical application cloud migration data.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising defining, on the separate computer, at least one rule for a cloud code analysis tool (CCAT) based on the plurality of user-defined objectives for application cloud migration;

and

executing, on the separate computer, the CCAT to determine any non-conformities to cloud migration for each subject application based on the at least one rule.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the executing of the CCAT further includes determining the time required to resolve the non-conformities to cloud migration for each subject application based on the at least one rule.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the executing of the CCAT further includes correcting the non-conformities to cloud migration for each subject application based on the at least one rule.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving non-functional requirements for the subject applications based on the application inventory data or any additional applications for cloud migration via the user interface.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising capturing any commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) applications not discovered by the first program.

7. The method of claim 6, further comprising storing the captured COTS applications in the assessment database.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving at least one cloud reference architecture based at least upon the plurality of user-defined objectives for application cloud migration or the set of filtered predetermined CRISP categories.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving key success criteria (KSC) based at least upon the plurality of user-defined objectives for application cloud migration or the set of filtered predetermined CRISP categories.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining the current operating environment of the subject applications.