Price mining prevention systems and related methods

• US 10,389,752 B2
• Filed: 12/14/2016
• Issued: 08/20/2019
• Est. Priority Date: 01/14/2015
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Viesoft, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Viesoft, Inc.
• Inventors: Vierra, Anthony
• Primary Examiner(s): Leung, Robert B
• Assistant Examiner(s): Ho, Thomas
• Application Number:
  US15/379,137
• Publication Number:
  US 20170093909A1
• Time in Patent Office: 979 Days
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/2465 Query processing support for facilitating data mining operations in structured databases
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/951 Indexing; Web crawling techniques
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/36 by graphic or iconic representation
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/55 Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/604 Tools and structures for managing or administering access control systems
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2221/2133 Verifying human interaction, e.g., Captcha
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/1053 Employment or hiring
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0201 Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0206 Price or cost determination based on market factors
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0601 Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/01 Social networking
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/10 for controlling access to devices or network resources
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/1466 Active attacks involving interception, injection, modification, spoofing of data unit addresses, e.g. hijacking, packet injection or TCP sequence number attacks

Abstract

A price-mining prevention system, in various embodiments, is configured for: (A) detecting an access to a particular web page containing pricing information; (B) determining whether a source of the access is an individual employed by one or more competitors of a company that owns the particular web page being accessed; and (C) at least partially in response to determining that the individual is employed by one or more competitors of a company that owns the particular web page being assessed, taking one or more defensive actions against the source of the access. The step of determining whether the individual is employed by a competitor of the company may comprise scanning a post made on one or more public message boards to determine, based on the content of the post, whether the message board poster is employed by a competitor of a company that owns the particular web page.

Claims

1. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing computer-executable instructions for preventing an unwanted access source from mining pricing information on an online retail website by:

detecting, by one or more computer processors, an access to a particular web page containing pricing information;

determining, by one or more computer processors, whether a source of the access is an individual employed by one or more competitors of a company that owns the particular web page being accessed; and

at least partially in response to determining that the individual is employed by one or more competitors of a company that owns the particular web page being assessed, taking, by one or more computer processors, one or more defensive actions against the source of the access, wherein the one or more defensive actions comprise automatically blocking, by a processor, the source of the access from further access to the particular web page.

5. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein determining whether the source of the access is an individual employed by the one or more competitors, comprises:

determining that the source of the access is the individual;

determining at least one identifying piece of data associated with the individual; and

determining, based at least in part on the at least one identifying piece of data, whether the individual is employed by the one or more competitors.

6. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 5, wherein:

determining the at least one identifying piece of data associated with the individual comprises determining the at least one identifying piece of data based at least in part on an account associated with the individual for the particular web page; and

determining whether the individual is employed by the one or more competitors comprises;

using the at least one identifying piece of data to identify one or more social networking accounts associated with the individual; and

determining, from the one or more social networking accounts associated with the individual, employment information associated with the individual.

7. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 6, wherein the employment information comprises the individual'"'"'s job title.

8. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the step of determining whether a source of the access is an individual employed by one or more competitors of a company that owns the particular web page being accessed comprises determining whether an IP address associated with the source of access is an IP address associated with the one or more competitors.

9. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the step of determining whether a source of the access is an individual employed by one or more competitors of a company that owns the particular web page being accessed comprises scanning a post made on one or more public message boards to determine, based at least in part on the content of the post, whether the message board poster is employed by a competitor of a company that owns the particular web page.

10. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the step of determining whether a source of the access is an individual employed by one or more competitors of a company that owns the particular web page being accessed comprises scanning a review made on one or more public web sites to determine, based at least in part on the content of the review, whether the reviewer is employed by a competitor of a company that owns the particular web page.

11. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the step of determining whether a source of the access is an individual employed by one or more competitors of a company that owns the particular web page being accessed comprises:

obtaining a name of an individual who is the source of access;

determining whether the name is on a list of names of employees of the one or more competitors; and

in response to determining that the name is on the list of names of employees, determining that the individual is employed by the one or more competitors.

22. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the computer-readable medium further stores computer-executable instructions for:

determining whether the source is an unwanted automated source attempting to mine the pricing information;

at least partially in response to determining that the source is an unwanted automated source, taking one or more defensive actions against the source; and

at least partially in response to determining that the source is a wanted automated source, not taking one or more defensive actions against the source.

2. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing computer-executable instructions for preventing an unwanted access source from mining pricing information on an online retail website by:

detecting, by one or more computer processors, an access to a particular web page containing pricing information;

determining, by one or more computer processors, whether a source of the access is an individual employed by one or more competitors of a company that owns the particular web page being accessed; and

at least partially in response to determining that the individual is employed by one or more competitors of a company that owns the particular web page being assessed, taking, by one or more computer processors, one or more defensive actions against the source of the access, wherein the one or more defensive actions comprise requiring the source of the access to complete one or more CAPTCHAs.

3. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 2, wherein the computer-executable instructions further comprise computer-executable instructions for, at least partially in response to a failure by the source of the access to complete the one or more CAPTCHAs, blocking the source of the access from further access to the particular web page.

23. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 2, wherein the computer-readable medium further stores computer-executable instructions for:

determining whether the source is an unwanted automated source attempting to mine the pricing information;

at least partially in response to determining that the source is an unwanted automated source, taking one or more defensive actions against the source; and

at least partially in response to determining that the source is a wanted automated source, not taking one or more defensive actions against the source.

24. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 2, wherein determining whether the source of the access is the individual employed by the one or more competitors, comprises:

determining that the source of the access is the individual;

determining at least one identifying piece of data associated with the individual; and

determining, based at least in part on the at least one identifying piece of data, whether the individual is employed by the one or more competitors.

4. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing computer-executable instructions for preventing an unwanted access source from mining pricing information on an online retail website by:

detecting, by one or more computer processors, an access to a particular web page containing pricing information;

determining, by one or more computer processors, whether a source of the access is an individual employed by one or more competitors of a company that owns the particular web page being accessed; and

at least partially in response to determining that the individual is employed by one or more competitors of a company that owns the particular web page being assessed, taking, by one or more computer processors, one or more defensive actions against the source of the access, wherein taking one or more defensive actions comprises limiting a number of accesses to the particular web page by the source to between 1 and 10 accesses in a 24 hour period.

25. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 4, wherein the computer-readable medium further stores computer-executable instructions for:

determining whether the source is an unwanted automated source attempting to mine the pricing information;

at least partially in response to determining that the source is an unwanted automated source, taking one or more defensive actions against the source; and

at least partially in response to determining that the source is a wanted automated source, not taking one or more defensive actions against the source.

26. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 4, wherein determining whether the source of the access is the individual employed by the one or more competitors, comprises:

determining that the source of the access is the individual;

determining at least one identifying piece of data associated with the individual; and

determining, based at least in part on the at least one identifying piece of data, whether the individual is employed by the one or more competitors.

12. A computer-implemented method for preventing an unwanted access source from mining pricing information on an online retail website, the computer-implemented method comprising the steps of:

detecting, by one or more computer processors, an access to a particular web page containing pricing information;

determining, by one or more computer processors, whether a source of the access is an individual that is employed by one or more competitors of a company that owns the particular web page being accessed;

determining, by one or more computer processors, a job title of the individual;

determining, by one or more computer processors, based on the job title, that the individual should be prohibited from obtaining pricing information from the online retail website; and

in response to determining that the individual should be prohibited from obtaining pricing information from the online retail website, taking, by a processor, one or more defensive actions against the source of the access, wherein the one or more defensive actions comprise automatically blocking, by a processor, the source of the access from further access to the particular web page.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, wherein determining whether the source of the access is an individual employed by the one or more competitors, comprises:

determining that the source of the access is the individual;

determining at least one identifying piece of data associated with the individual; and

determining, based at least in part on the at least one identifying piece of data, whether the individual is employed by the one or more competitors.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 15, wherein:

determining the at least one identifying piece of data associated with the individual comprises determining the at least one identifying piece of data based at least in part on an account associated with the individual for the particular web page;

determining whether the individual is employed by the one or more competitors comprises;

using the at least one identifying piece of data to identify one or more social networking accounts associated with the individual; and

determining, from the one or more social networking accounts associated with the individual, employment information associated with the individual.

17. The computer-implemented method of claim 16, wherein the employment information comprises the individual'"'"'s job title.

18. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, wherein the computer-implemented method further comprises:

determining whether the source is an unwanted automated source attempting to mine the pricing information;

at least partially in response to determining that the source is an unwanted automated source, taking one or more defensive actions against the source; and

at least partially in response to determining that the source is a wanted automated source, not taking one or more defensive actions against the source.

19. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, wherein the step of determining whether a source of the access is an individual employed by one or more competitors of a company that owns the particular web page being accessed comprises determining whether an IP address associated with the source of access is an IP address associated with the one or more competitors.

20. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, wherein the step of determining whether a source of the access is an individual employed by one or more competitors of a company that owns the particular web page being accessed comprises scanning a post made on one or more public message boards to determine, based at least in part on the content of the post, whether the message board poster is employed by a competitor of a company that owns the particular web page.

21. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, wherein the step of determining whether a source of the access is an individual employed by one or more competitors of a company that owns the particular web page being accessed comprises scanning a review made on one or more public web sites to determine, based at least in part on the content of the review, whether the reviewer is employed by a competitor of a company that owns the particular web page.

13. A computer-implemented method for preventing an unwanted access source from mining pricing information on an online retail website, the computer-implemented method comprising the steps of:

detecting, by one or more computer processors, an access to a particular web page containing pricing information;

determining, by one or more computer processors, whether a source of the access is an individual that is employed by one or more competitors of a company that owns the particular web page being accessed;

determining, by one or more computer processors, a job title of the individual;

determining, by one or more computer processors, based on the job title, that the individual should be prohibited from obtaining pricing information from the online retail website; and

in response to determining that the individual should be prohibited from obtaining pricing information from the online retail website, taking, by a processor, one or more defensive actions against the source of the access, wherein the one or more defensive actions comprise requiring the source of the access to complete one or more CAPTCHAs.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein the computer-executable instructions further comprise computer-executable instructions for, at least partially in response to a failure by the source of the access to complete the one or more CAPTCHAs, blocking the source of the access from further access to the particular web page.