Method and apparatus for a receiving, inspection, and supplier quality system

• US 10,410,161 B2
• Filed: 06/14/2007
• Issued: 09/10/2019
• Est. Priority Date: 06/14/2007
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: The Boeing Co.
• Original Assignee: The Boeing Co.
• Inventors: Martinek, Brian Joseph, Koch, Warren Richard, Hammond, Jr., James Arthur, Anderson, George E.
• Primary Examiner(s): Crawley, Talia F
• Application Number:
  US11/762,925
• Publication Number:
  US 20080313059A1
• Time in Patent Office: 4,471 Days
• Field of Search: 438 14, 705 8, 705 22, 705 28
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/08 Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/087 Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement or balancing against orders

Abstract

The disclosure provides a computer implemented method, apparatus, and computer usable program code for managing inspection of items. In one embodiment, an identifier for an item is received in a shipment of items to form a received item. Inspection criteria for inspecting the shipment of items are adjusted using a quality history. The quality history is data regarding results of inspections of items. A result of the inspection is received. The quality history is updated with the result of the inspection.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

automated management of inspection of items using past supplier performance and product quality history to determine an inspection level and an inspection sample size by a computer system;

receiving an identifier for an item in a shipment of items to form item received data;

outputting inspection criteria for the item;

retrieving a quality history for the item from an inventory management database, wherein the quality history is data regarding results of inspections of a similar item received;

automatically adjusting inspection criteria for inspecting the shipment of items using the quality history to form adjusted inspection criteria, wherein the adjusted inspection criteria includes the inspection level and the inspection sample size, wherein the inspection level includes at least one of skip inspection, normal inspection, and tightened inspection;

receiving an inspection result from inspection of the item, wherein the inspection of the item is performed with the adjusted inspection criteria;

determining, based on the inspection result, whether the item is a conforming item or a non-conforming item;

responsive to the item being a conforming item, ordering that the item be delivered; and

responsive to the item being a non-conforming item, taking an action selected from the group consisting of;

ordering that the item is to be delivered, ordering that the item is to be returned, ordering that the item is to be re-worked, and ordering that the item is to be scrapped.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the inspection result indicates a set of nonconforming items in the shipment of items, and further comprising the computer system:

notifying appropriate personnel of the set of nonconforming items using predetermined roles to identify the appropriate personnel.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the inspection result indicates a set of nonconforming items in the shipment of items, and further comprising the computer system:

accepting instructions for dealing with the set of nonconforming items.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the inspection result indicates a set of nonconforming items in the shipment of items, and further comprising the computer system:

receiving a disposition for the set of nonconforming items, wherein the disposition indicates that the set of nonconforming items are to be returned to a supplier of the set of nonconforming items for corrective action; and

sending a notification of nonconformance to the supplier of the set of nonconforming items, wherein the notification of nonconformance comprises a notification to the supplier of a return of the set of nonconforming items and a request for the corrective action.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the inspection result indicates a set of nonconforming items in the shipment of items, and further comprising the computer system:

receiving a disposition for the set of nonconforming items, wherein the disposition indicates that the set of nonconforming items are to be reworked.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the inspection sample size includes at least one of a full inspection, a sample inspection, or no inspection, wherein the full inspection indicates that all items in the shipment of items should be inspected, and wherein the sample inspection indicates that only a selected number of items in the shipment of items should be inspected.

20. The method of claim 1, further comprising the computer system:

receiving the inspection result; and

updating the quality history for a received item using the inspection result to form an updated quality history.

21. The method of claim 20 wherein the received item is a first item and the shipment of items is a first shipment, and further comprising the computer system:

receiving an identifier for a second item in a second shipment of items;

adjusting inspection criteria for inspecting the second shipment of items using the updated quality history;

receiving a second inspection result of the second shipments of items; and

updating the updated quality history with the second inspection result.

7. A computer program product comprising:

a computer-readable, non-transitory storage medium including program code for automated management of inspection of items using past supplier performance and product quality history to determine an inspection level and an inspection sample size, said computer program product comprising;

first program code for receiving an identifier for an item in a shipment of items to form received item data;

second program code for retrieving a quality history for a received item, wherein the quality history is data regarding results of inspections of items received;

third program code for outputting inspection criteria for the received item;

fourth program code for automatically adjusting inspection criteria for inspecting the shipment of items using the quality history to form adjusted inspection criteria, wherein the adjusted inspection criteria include the inspection level and the inspection sample size, wherein the inspection level includes at least one of skip inspection, normal inspection, and tightened inspection;

fifth program code for receiving an inspection result for the item, wherein the inspection result is for an inspection using the adjusted inspection criteria;

sixth program code for determining, based on the inspection result, whether the item is a conforming item or a non-conforming item;

seventh program code for, responsive to the item being a conforming item, ordering that the item be delivered; and

eighth program code for, responsive to the item being a non-conforming item, taking an action selected from the group consisting of;

ordering that the item is to be delivered, ordering that the item is to be returned, ordering that the item is to be re-worked, and ordering that the item is to be scrapped.

8. The computer program product of claim 7 wherein the inspection result indicates a set of nonconforming items in the shipment of items, and the computer program product further comprises:

ninth program code for notifying appropriate personnel of the set of nonconforming items using predetermined roles in a system to identify the appropriate personnel.

9. The computer program product of claim 7 wherein the inspection result indicates a set of nonconforming items in the shipment of items, and the computer program product further comprises:

ninth program code for accepting instructions for dealing with the set of nonconforming items.

10. The computer program product of claim 7 wherein the inspection result indicates a set of nonconforming items in the shipment of items, and the computer program product further comprises:

ninth program code for receiving a disposition for the set of nonconforming items, wherein the disposition indicates that the set of nonconforming items are to be returned to a supplier of the shipment of items for corrective action; and

tenth program code for sending a notification of nonconformance to the supplier, wherein the notification of nonconformance comprises a notification to the supplier of a return of the set of nonconforming items and a request for the corrective action.

11. The computer program product of claim 7, wherein the computer program product further comprises:

ninth program code for updating the quality history for items received to form an updated quality history, wherein the received item is a first item and the shipment of items is a first shipment;

tenth program code for receiving an identifier for a second item in a second shipment of items;

eleventh program code for adjusting inspection criteria for inspecting the second shipment of items using the updated quality history;

twelfth program code for receiving a second inspection result of the second shipment of items; and

thirteenth program code for updating the updated quality history with the second inspection result.

12. The computer program product of claim 7 wherein the inspection sample size includes at least one of a full inspection, a sample inspection, or no inspection, wherein the full inspection indicates that all items in the shipment of items should be inspected, and wherein the sample inspection indicates that only a selected number of items in the shipment of items should be inspected.

22. The computer program product of claim 7 further comprising:

computer usable program code for receiving an inspection result; and

computer usable program code for updating the quality history for the received item using the inspection result.

13. A system comprising:

a computer having at least one processor unit; and

an inventory management system for automated management of inspection of items using past supplier performance and product quality history to determine an inspection level and an inspection sample size, wherein the inventory management system is configured to cause the at least one processor unit to;

receive an identifier for a received item in a shipment of items to form item received data;

output inspection criteria for the received item;

retrieve a quality history for the received item, wherein the quality history is data regarding results of inspections of a similar item received; and

receive an inspection result formed upon inspection of the received item using adjusted inspection criteria, wherein the processor unit is configured to automatically adjust inspection criteria for inspecting the shipment of items using the quality history to form the adjusted inspection criteria, wherein the adjusted inspection criteria includes the inspection level and the inspection sample size, and wherein the inspection level includes at least one of skip inspection, normal inspection, and tightened inspection;

determine, based on the inspection result, whether the received item is a conforming item or a non-conforming item;

order, responsive to the received item being a conforming item, that the received item be delivered; and

take an action, responsive to the received item being a non-conforming item, the action selected from the group consisting of;

ordering that the received item is to be delivered, ordering that the received item is to be returned, ordering that the received item is to be re-worked, and ordering that the received item is to be scrapped.

14. The system of claim 13, wherein the inspection result indicates a set of nonconforming items in the shipment of items and wherein the at least one processor unit is further configured to notify appropriate personnel of the set of nonconforming items using predetermined roles to identify the appropriate personnel.

15. The system of claim 13, wherein the inspection result indicates a set of nonconforming items in the shipment of items and wherein the at least one processor unit is further configured to accept instructions for dealing with the set of nonconforming items.

16. The system of claim 13, wherein the inspection result indicates a set of nonconforming items in the shipment of items, and wherein the at least one processor unit is further configured to:

receive a disposition for the set of nonconforming items, wherein the disposition indicates that the set of nonconforming items are to be returned to a supplier of the set of nonconforming items for corrective action; and

send a notification of nonconformance to the supplier of the set of nonconforming items, wherein the notification of nonconformance comprises a notification to the supplier of a return of the set of nonconforming items and a request for the corrective action.

17. The system of claim 13, wherein the inspection result indicates a set of nonconforming items in the shipment of items, and wherein the at least one processor unit is further configured to receive a disposition for the set of nonconforming items, wherein the disposition indicates that the set of nonconforming items are to be reworked.

18. The system of claim 13, wherein the received item is a first item and the shipment of items is a first shipment, and wherein updating the quality history for items received forms an updated quality history, and wherein the at least one processor unit is further configured to:

receive an identifier for a second item in a second shipment of items;

adjust inspection criteria for inspecting the second shipment of items using the updated quality history;

receive a second inspection result of the second shipments of items; and

update the updated quality history with the second inspection result.

19. The system of claim 13, wherein the inspection sample size includes at least one of a full inspection, a sample inspection, or no inspection, wherein the full inspection indicates that all items in the shipment of items should be inspected, and wherein the sample inspection indicates that only a selected number of items in the shipment of items should be inspected.

23. The system of claim 13 wherein:

the processor unit is configured to receive the inspection result; and

the processor unit is configured to update the quality history for the received item using the inspection result.