Evaluation and training for online vehicle request and response messaging

• US 10,453,109 B2
• Filed: 07/30/2015
• Issued: 10/22/2019
• Est. Priority Date: 07/30/2015
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: SCI Ltd.
• Original Assignee: SCI Ltd.
• Inventors: Paton, Ross Kenneth McKenzie
• Primary Examiner(s): Dunham, Jason B
• Assistant Examiner(s): Weiner, Arielle E
• Application Number:
  US14/813,178
• Publication Number:
  US 20170032440A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,545 Days
• Field of Search: 705 261- 272
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0625 Directed, with specific intent or strategy
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/02 using automatic reactions or user delegation, e.g. automatic replies or chatbot-generated messages

Abstract

A method for evaluating an electronic response message by a vehicle product vendor for an online electronic inquiry message from a consumer concerning a vehicle product inquiry, the method comprising the steps of: receiving the online electronic inquiry message; identifying the inquiry content pertaining to each of the plurality of inquiry content categories; receiving the electronic response message; identifying the response content pertaining to each of the plurality of response content categories; scoring each of the response content; comparing a message reception timestamp and a message send timestamp; generating a response score by combining the quantitative score to the message send timestamp and the quantitative score to the assigned response content; and sending a score message.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for online evaluating, at an inquiry server, an electronic response message provided by a computer-implemented vehicle product vendor for an online electronic inquiry message from a consumer concerning a vehicle product inquiry, the method comprising the steps of:

receiving, at the inquiry server, the online electronic inquiry message over a communications network in real time, the electronic inquiry message containing inquiry content and a message reception timestamp of the electronic inquiry message, the inquiry content including a plurality of inquiry content categories associated with vehicle inquiries;

identifying, at the inquiry server, the inquiry content pertaining to each of the plurality of inquiry content categories by comparing the inquiry content to a definition of each of the plurality of inquiry content categories;

receiving, at the inquiry server, the electronic response message over a communications network in real time, the electronic response message pertaining to the electronic inquiry message, the electronic response message containing response content including a plurality of response content categories associated with vehicle inquiries and a message send timestamp of the electronic response message;

identifying, at the inquiry server, the response content pertaining to each of the plurality of response content categories by comparing the response content to a definition of each of the plurality of response content categories and assigning portions of the response content when identified to each of the plurality of response content categories;

dynamically scoring, at the inquiry server, and in real-time the response content pertaining to each of the plurality of response content categories using a scoring model by assigning a quantitative score to the assigned response content of each of the plurality of response content categories, the quantitative scores based on at least one of the response content being present for a selected response content category and a degree of detail of the response content relative to the definition of the selected response category, the quantitative score being updated dynamically and in real time as subsequent portions of the response content are received and analyzed;

comparing, at the inquiry server and in real time, the message reception timestamp and the message send timestamp and assigning a quantitative score to the message send timestamp based on a magnitude difference between the message reception timestamp and the message send timestamp;

generating, at the inquiry server, a response score, in real-time by combining the quantitative score to the message send timestamp and the quantitative score to the assigned response content;

sending from the inquiry server a score message, in real-time representing the response score over the communications network for display on a user interface of the computer-implemented vehicle product vendor;

receiving feedback information, in real-time across the communications network from the user interface of the vehicle product vendor defining whether the electronic response message resulted in a positive outcome; and

in response to the feedback information;

determining, at the inquiry server in real-time, which of the response content categories of the scoring model were linked to the positive outcome; and

in response to said determining, said updated dynamically of the scoring model by adjusting a weighting of each of the response content categories for determining the quantitative score to the assigned response content.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the score message includes indicators identifying response categories missing from the response content of the electronic response message.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the score message includes indicators identifying suggested replacement response content for identified portions of the response content.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the score message includes indicators identifying additional response content for the response content.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of inquiry content categories are selected from the group consisting of:

consumer name;

product of interest; and

one or more questions related to the vehicle product of interest.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the vehicle product of interest is a vehicle selected from the group consisting of:

a passenger vehicle;

a transport vehicle;

a land-based recreational vehicle; and

a water-based recreational vehicle.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of response content categories are selected from the group consisting of:

introduction content;

vehicle product value proposition;

vehicle product availability;

response to a consumer question;

a question by the vehicle product vendor;

stated vehicle product price;

vendor value proposition;

vendor contact details;

content grammar and spelling;

structure and content of a message subject line; and

inclusion of active links.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein a vehicle product of interest is a vehicle selected from the group consisting of:

a passenger vehicle;

a transport vehicle;

a land-based recreational vehicle; and

a water-based recreational vehicle.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the electronic response message is an email directed to the consumer as a potential customer of a vehicle dealership.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein a definition of each of the plurality of response content categories includes rules selected from the group consisting of:

spelling rules for text of the response content;

grammar rules for text of the response content;

recognition of a response category of the plurality of response categories based on contained features or structure in the electronic response message;

assignment of a topic to selected text of the response; and

assignment of semantics to selected text of the response content.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the electronic inquiry message and the associated electronic response message are contained as a plurality of different electronic inquiry messages and the associated electronic response messages.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the electronic inquiry message and the associated electronic response message are received before the electronic response message is transmitted to the consumer over the communications network and the score message indicates at least one action pertaining to revision of the electronic response message to a sender of the electronic response message associated with the vehicle product vendor.

13. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:

intercepting the electronic response message before transmission over the communications network to the consumer;

comparing the response score to a score threshold to determine whether the electronic response message is below the score threshold indicative of a substandard electronic response message; and

including indicators in the score message indicating portions of the electronic response message contributing to the electronic response message being determined as substandard, the indicators relating to relevant scores of each portion of the response content determined in said scoring step.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the indicators include identification of response categories missing from the response content of the electronic response message.

15. The method of claim 13, wherein the indicators include identification of suggested replacement response content for identified portions of the response content.

16. The method of claim 13, wherein the indicators include identification of additional response content for the response content.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein the indicators indicate the magnitude difference between the message reception timestamp and the message send timestamp as being determined to be substandard.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein the vehicle product vendor is a specified vehicle dealership of a network of dealerships.

19. The method of claim 18 further comprising the step of:

receiving a vehicle product sale indicator of a vehicle product of interest contained in the electronic inquiry message, the vehicle product sale indicator resulting from the electronic response message indicating the consumer purchased the vehicle product of interest from a specified vehicle dealership.

20. The method of claim 18 further comprising the step of:

receiving a vehicle product sale indicator of a vehicle product of interest contained in the electronic inquiry message, the product sale indicator resulting from the electronic response message indicating the consumer purchased the vehicle product of interest from a vehicle dealership of the network of dealerships other than the specified vehicle dealership.

21. The method of claim 13 further comprising the steps of:

receiving a revised electronic response message pertaining to the electronic response message, the revised electronic response message containing revised response content and a revised message send timestamp;

identifying revised response content pertaining to each of the plurality of response content categories by comparing the revised response content to the definition of each of the plurality of response content categories and assigning portions of the revised response content when identified to each of the plurality of response content categories;

scoring of the revised response content pertaining to each of the plurality of response content categories using a scoring model by assigning a revised quantitative score to the assigned revised response content of each of the plurality of response content categories, the revised quantitative scores based on at least one of the revised response content being present for a selected response content category and a degree of detail of the revised response content relative to the definition of the selected response category;

comparing the message reception timestamp and the revised message send timestamp and assigning a revised quantitative score to the revised message send timestamp based on a revised magnitude difference between the message reception timestamp and the revised message send timestamp;

generating a revised response score by combining the revised quantitative score to the revised message send timestamp and the revised quantitative score to the assigned revised response content; and

sending a revised score message representing the revised response score over the communications network for display on the user interface of the vehicle product vendor.

22. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:

receiving a vehicle product sale indicator of a vehicle product of interest contained in the electronic inquiry message, the vehicle product sale indicator resulting from the electronic response message indicating the consumer either purchased or did not purchase the vehicle product of interest from the vehicle product vendor; and

updating the scoring model to include a result of the vehicle product sale indicator for the electronic response message.

23. The method of claim 21, wherein the scoring model includes a respective weighting factor for each of the plurality of response content categories.

24. The method of claim 23 wherein said updating includes adjusting the respective weighting factors based on the scores for the response content assigned to each of the plurality of response content categories.

25. The method of claim 10 further comprising the steps of:

receiving a vehicle product sale indicator of a vehicle product of interest contained in the electronic inquiry message, the vehicle product sale indicator resulting from the electronic response message indicating the consumer either purchased or did not purchase the vehicle product of interest from the vehicle product vendor; and

updating the rules to include a result of the vehicle product sale indicator for the electronic response message.