Satellite ground terminal incorporating a smart antenna that rejects interference

• US 10,490,892 B2
• Filed: 02/16/2011
• Issued: 11/26/2019
• Est. Priority Date: 12/06/2007
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Spatial Digital Systems Inc
• Original Assignee: Spatial Digital Systems Inc
• Inventors: Chang, Donald C. D.
• Primary Examiner(s): Gregory, Bernarr E
• Assistant Examiner(s): Mull, Fred H
• Application Number:
  US13/029,015
• Publication Number:
  US 20120062420A1
• Time in Patent Office: 3,205 Days
• Field of Search: 342359, 342372, 342377
• CPC Class Codes: H01Q 19/12 wherein the surfaces are concave H01Q19/18 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: H01Q 21/29 Combinations of different interacting antenna units for giving a desired directional characteristic H01Q25/00 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: H01Q 3/2605 Array of radiating elements provided with a feedback control over the element weights, e.g. adaptive arrays

Abstract

This device combines multiple elements that function like a single smart antenna that performs both connectivity and spatial discrimination functions. The antenna functions in both receive and transmit modes. The apparatus utilizes commonly used components to distinguish and separate desired satellite signals from those signals of satellites in close directional proximity. Disclosed are six methods for optimizing simultaneously reception of multiple desired satellite signals performed either mechanically or electronically and also included is an optimization technique. The transmission apparatus uses many of the same components as the receiver antenna and additionally uses in-beam nulling to fine tune transmission.

Claims

1. A method for signal communication with a plurality of satellites with at least one signal source having known directional information via an antenna array, the antenna array having an angular resolution smaller than an angular separation of the satellites and comprising a set of directional antenna elements aligned in a predetermined direction and having a baseline selected according to the angular resolution and a controller module, the baseline being a distance between two outermost edges of apertures of the antenna elements, the method comprising the acts of:

(a) receiving a set of input signals having signal parameters from the plurality of satellites via the directional antenna elements;

(b) receiving user-defined performance criteria via the controller module;

(c) adjusting relative spacing of the directional antenna elements within the baseline;

(d) performing weighting and summing of the input signals via the controller module, the weighting having weighting functions that are updatable and are based on the signal parameters including at least amplitudes and phases or the known directional information of the at least one signal source;

(e) generating performance measurables from the act of (d) performing weighting and summing of the input signals, via the controller module;

(f) comparing the performance measurables to the user-defined performance criteria, via the controller module; and

(g) updating the weighting functions using a gradient search based on the act of comparing the performance measurables to the user-defined performance criteria, via the controller module.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one signal source is a first satellite, the method further comprising the act of creating a beam having a first beam peak in a direction of a first satellite, a first null in a direction of a second satellite and a second null in a direction of a third satellite, via the controller module.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one signal source is a first satellite and a second satellite, the method further comprising the act of creating simultaneously a first beam and a second beam via the controller module, the first beam having a first beam peak in a direction of the first satellite and a first null in a direction of the second satellite, the second beam having a second beam peak in the direction of the second satellite and a second null in the direction of the first satellite.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising the act of repeating the acts of (d), (e), (f), and (g) until the performance measurables meet the performance criteria.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the adjusted relative spacing of the directional antenna elements is aperiodic.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the directional antenna elements of the antenna array are in re-locatable positions.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the act of (c) adjusting relative spacing of the directional antenna elements is based on a minimum redundancy array principle.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the act of (g) updating the weighting functions comprises the act of adjusting relative radio frequency amplitudes and phases of the input signals.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the act of (g) updating the weighting functions comprises the act of adjusting relative radio frequency phases of the input signals.

10. A method for signal communication with first and second satellites each having known directional information via an antenna array, the antenna array having an angular resolution smaller than an angular separation of the first and second satellites and comprising a set of directional antenna elements aligned in a predetermined direction and having a baseline selected according to the angular resolution and a controller module, the baseline being a distance between two outermost edges of apertures of the antenna elements, the method comprising the acts of:

(a) receiving a set of input signals having signal parameters from the first and second satellites via the directional antenna elements;

(b) receiving user-defined performance criteria via the controller module;

(c) adjusting relative spacing of the directional antenna elements within the baseline;

(d) performing weighting and summing of the input signals via the controller module, the weighting having weighting functions that are updatable and are based on the signal parameters including at least amplitudes and phases or the known directional information of the at least one signal source;

(e) generating performance measurables from the act of (d) performing weighting and summing of the input signals, via the controller module;

(f) comparing the performance measurables to the user-defined performance criteria, via the controller module;

(g) updating the weighting functions using a gradient search based on the act of comparing the performance measurables to the user-defined performance criteria, via the controller module; and

(h) creating simultaneously a first beam and a second beam via the controller module, the first beam having a first beam peak in a direction of the first satellite and a first null in a direction of the second satellite, the second beam having a second beam peak in the direction of the second satellite and a second null in the direction of the first satellite.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the act of (c) adjusting relative spacing of the directional antenna elements is based on a minimum redundancy array principle.

12. The method of claim 10, wherein the adjusted relative spacing of the directional antenna elements is aperiodic.

13. The method of claim 10, wherein the act of (h) creating simultaneously the first beam and the second beam comprises creating simultaneously the first beam having a third null in a direction of a third satellite and the second beam having a fourth null in the direction of the third satellite.

14. The method of claim 10 further comprising the act of repeating the acts of (d), (e), (f), and (g) until the performance measurables meet the performance criteria.

15. The method of claim 10, wherein the directional antenna elements of the antenna array are reflectors in mobile positions with respect to each other.

16. The method of claim 10, wherein the directional antenna elements of the antenna array are in re-locatable positions.

17. The method of claim 10, wherein the act of (g) updating the weighting functions comprises the act of adjusting relative radio frequency amplitudes and phases of the input signals.

18. The method of claim 10, wherein the act of (g) updating the weighting functions comprises the act of adjusting relative radio frequency phases of the input signals.

19. A method for signal communication with N satellites each having known directional information via an antenna array, N being greater than 1, the antenna array having an angular resolution smaller than an angular separation of the N satellites and comprising a set of directional antenna elements aligned in a predetermined direction and having a baseline selected according to the angular resolution and a controller module, the baseline being a distance between two outermost edges of apertures of the antenna elements, the method comprising the acts of:

(a) receiving a set of input signals having signal parameters from the N satellites via the directional antenna elements;

(b) receiving user-defined performance criteria via the controller module;

(c) adjusting relative spacing of the directional antenna elements within the baseline;

(d) performing weighting and summing of the input signals via the controller module, the weighting having weighting functions that are updatable and are based on the signal parameters including amplitudes and phases or the known directional information of the respective N satellites;

(e) generating performance measurables from the act of (d) performing weighting and summing of the input signals, via the controller module;

(f) comparing the performance measurables to the user-defined performance criteria, via the controller module;

(g) updating the weighting functions using a gradient search based on result of the act of comparing the performance measurables to the user-defined performance criteria, via the controller module; and

(h) creating simultaneously N orthogonal beams corresponding respectively to the N satellites via the controller module, each of the N beams having a high-gain beam peak toward a direction of a respective satellite of the N satellites and nulls towards directions of the remaining N-1 satellites.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein the act of (c) adjusting relative spacing of the directional antenna elements is based on a minimum redundancy array principle.

21. The method of claim 19, wherein the adjusted relative spacing of the directional antenna elements is aperiodic.

22. The method of claim 19, wherein the directional antenna elements of the antenna array are reflectors in mobile positions with respect to each other.

23. The method of claim 19, wherein the N satellites are geo-satellites.

24. The method of claim 19 further comprising the act of repeating the acts of (d), (e), (f), and (g) until the performance measurables meet the performance criteria.

25. The method of claim 19, wherein the act of (g) updating the weighting functions comprises the act of adjusting relative radio frequency amplitudes and phases of the input signals.

26. The method of claim 19, further comprising the act of transmitting simultaneously N signals to the N respective satellites using the N orthogonal beams.