Systems and methods for article inspections

• US 10,494,759 B1
• Filed: 02/21/2019
• Issued: 12/03/2019
• Est. Priority Date: 02/21/2019
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: CaaStle, Inc.
• Original Assignee: CaaStle, Inc.
• Inventors: Ponte, Ericka, Noor, Kashif, Hoffman, Phillip, Demaray, Andrew
• Primary Examiner(s): Islam, Mohammad K
• Application Number:
  US16/281,902
• Time in Patent Office: 285 Days
• CPC Class Codes: D06F 93/00 Counting, sorting, or marking arrangements specially adapted for laundry purposes
• CPC Class Codes: D06F 95/008 Devices for keeping articles together during laundering, e.g. for keeping socks in pairs D06F95/004 takes precedence; Devices for protecting or shielding certain parts of the articles during laundering, e.g. button protectors
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/0412 Digitisers structurally integrated in a display
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/04842 Selection of displayed objects or displayed text elements G06F3/0482 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0875 Itemisation or classification of parts, supplies or services, e.g. bill of materials

Abstract

A method of using an inspection processor includes receiving one or more articles at an inspection station, and identifying, by the inspection processor, one of the articles by reading a unique identifier associated with the one of the articles. The method also includes inspecting the article based on at least one quality criterion, and updating an article tracking system based on the result of the inspection and the identifier.

Claims

1. A method of using an inspection processor, comprising:

receiving one or more articles at an inspection station comprising the inspection processor;

identifying, by the inspection processor, one of the articles by reading a unique identifier associated with the one of the articles received at the inspection station;

inspecting the identified article based on at least one quality criterion including odor of the identified article;

updating an article tracking system in communication with the inspection processor based on the identifier of the inspected article and the result of the inspection, wherein the article tracking system includes an inspection history that includes a failure history for the identified article;

determining, by the inspection processor, when the failure history for the identified article indicates a number of failures for odor that is equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold number of failures; and

removing the identified article from circulation, either temporarily or permanently, based on the determination by the inspection processor that the failure history of the identified article indicates that the number of failures for odor is equal to or greater than the predetermined threshold number of failures.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the identified article is a garment or an accessory for a garment, the at least one quality criterion includes, in addition to odor of the identified article, at least one of:

determining the presence of a stain, color bleeding, tearing, snagging, broken stitching, dirt, wrinkling, shrinkage, wear, pilling, color fading, missing or broken hardware, or missing or broken embellishments, and the inspecting the identified article includes evaluating the at least one quality criterion based on an area of the identified article.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the inspection history is stored in a database of the article tracking system that is updated in response to a failed inspection.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the inspection history is updated in response to reading a tag by a reading device or interacting with a touchscreen object that corresponds to a failed inspection.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the identified article is a garment, and wherein removing the garment from circulation includes permanently removing the garment from circulation based on the failure history indicating that the number of failures for odor is equal to or greater than the predetermined threshold number of failures.

6. The method of claim 1, further including:

reading a tag or interacting with a touchscreen object that corresponds to a category of failure or a cause of the failure; and

updating the article tracking system with the category of failure or the cause of failure.

7. The method of claim 1, further including, reading a tag that corresponds to a passed inspection when the result of the inspection is a passed inspection.

8. The method of claim 1, further including:

reading a tag or interacting with a touchscreen object that corresponds to a passed inspection when the result of the inspection is a passed inspection; and

updating the inspection tracking system with a location of the article that passed the inspection.

9. A method of inspecting an article using an inspection processor, comprising:

receiving one or more articles at an inspection station comprising the inspection processor;

identifying, by the inspection processor, one of the articles by reading an identifier associated with the one of the articles received at the inspection station;

displaying, on a display, an image representative of the identified article;

inspecting the identified article based on at least one quality criterion including odor of the identified article;

updating an article tracking system in communication with the inspection processor based on the identifier of the inspected article and the result of the inspection, wherein the article tracking system includes an inspection history that includes a failure history for the identified article;

determining, by the inspection processor, when the failure history for the identified article indicates a number of failures for odor that is equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold number of failures; and

removing the identified article from circulation, either temporarily or permanently, based on the determination by the inspection processor that the failure history of the identified article indicates that the number of failures for odor is equal to or greater than the predetermined threshold number of failures.

10. The method of claim 9, further including determining that the identified article is associated with an accessory, and displaying the the accessory in the image.

11. The method of claim 9, further including, when the result of the inspection is a failed inspection, reading a tag or interacting with a touchscreen object that corresponds to the failed inspection.

12. The method of claim 9, further including, when the result of the inspection is a passed inspection, reading, with a reading device, a tag that corresponds to the passed inspection.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the tag is displayed on the display by the inspection processor.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the identifier is a one-dimensional barcode or a two-dimensional barcode and the tag displayed on the display is a one-dimensional barcode or a two-dimensional barcode.

15. An inspection system, comprising:

an inspection processor configured to communicate with an article tracking system that stores information for a plurality of articles;

a plurality of identifiers associated with corresponding articles of the plurality of articles; and

an identifier reading device configured to read the plurality of identifiers;

wherein the inspection processor is configured to;

receive article information associated with a first one of the articles by identifying the first one of the articles based on encoded information received from the identifier reading device, wherein the article information is provided by the article tracking system to the inspection processor;

receive a failure history from the article tracking system, the failure history being included in an inspection history for the identified article stored in the article tracking system; and

determine when the failure history for the identified article indicates a number of failures for odor that is equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold number of failures.

16. The inspection system of claim 15, wherein the identifiers are unique to each article and include a tag having a one-dimensional barcode or a two-dimensional barcode.

17. The inspection system of claim 15, wherein the inspection processor is configured to transmit an update for the inspection history to the article tracking system based on an inspection result.

18. The inspection system of claim 17, further including a display, wherein the inspection processor is configured to determine an inspection result based on an interaction with a touchscreen object on the display or an output of the identifier reading device.

19. The inspection system of claim 18, wherein the inspection processor is configured to:

receive an entry corresponding to at least one of a category of failure or a cause of failure; and

update the article tracking system with the category of failure or the cause of failure.

20. The inspection system of claim 15, wherein the inspection processor is configured to update the article tracking system with the cause of failure, and wherein the cause of failure includes at least one of:

determining the presence of a stain, color bleeding, tearing, snagging, broken stitching, dirt, wrinkling, shrinkage, wear, pilling, color fading, missing or broken hardware, or missing or broken embellishments.