Systems and methods for automated document review and quality control
First Claim
1. A computer-implemented method for automated document review and quality control, at least a portion of the method being performed by a computing device comprising at least one processor, the method comprising:
- dividing a set of documents to be reviewed for relevancy into;
a set of control documents;
a set of training documents;
a set of quality-control documents; and
a set of review documents;
calculating, based on a set of reviews performed by a group of reviewers on the set of quality-control documents, an effective speed score for each reviewer in the group of reviewers, wherein the effective speed score indicates a reviewer'"'"'s ability to accurately complete a review in a given time, wherein accuracy is determined by agreement between the reviewer and other reviewers;
assigning, based on the effective speed score, the set of control documents and the set of training documents to the group of reviewers;
training a predictive model using a set of training reviews performed by the group of reviewers on both the set of training documents and the set of control documents; and
using the predictive model to evaluate the set of review documents.
5 Assignments
0 Petitions
Accused Products
Abstract
A computer-implemented method for automated document review and quality control may include (1) dividing a set of documents to be reviewed for relevancy into sets of control documents, training documents, quality-control documents, and review documents, (2) calculating, based on a set of reviews performed by a group of reviewers on the set of quality-control documents, an effective speed score for each reviewer in the group of reviewers, (3) assigning, based on the effective speed score, the set of control documents and the set of training documents to the group of reviewers, (4) training a predictive model using a set of training reviews performed by the group of reviewers on both the set of training documents and the set of control documents, and (5) using the predictive model to evaluate the set of review documents. Various other methods, systems, and computer-readable media are also disclosed.
19 Citations
20 Claims
-
1. A computer-implemented method for automated document review and quality control, at least a portion of the method being performed by a computing device comprising at least one processor, the method comprising:
-
dividing a set of documents to be reviewed for relevancy into; a set of control documents; a set of training documents; a set of quality-control documents; and a set of review documents; calculating, based on a set of reviews performed by a group of reviewers on the set of quality-control documents, an effective speed score for each reviewer in the group of reviewers, wherein the effective speed score indicates a reviewer'"'"'s ability to accurately complete a review in a given time, wherein accuracy is determined by agreement between the reviewer and other reviewers; assigning, based on the effective speed score, the set of control documents and the set of training documents to the group of reviewers; training a predictive model using a set of training reviews performed by the group of reviewers on both the set of training documents and the set of control documents; and using the predictive model to evaluate the set of review documents. - View Dependent Claims (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12)
-
-
13. A system for automated document review and quality control, the system comprising:
-
a division module, stored in memory, that divides a set of documents to be reviewed for relevancy into; a set of control documents; a set of training documents; a set of quality-control documents; and a set of review documents; a calculation module, stored in memory, that calculates;
based on a set of reviews performed by a group of reviewers on the set of quality-control documents, an effective speed score for each reviewer in the group of reviewers, wherein the effective speed score indicates a reviewer'"'"'s ability to accurately complete a review in a given time, wherein accuracy is determined by agreement between the reviewer and other reviewers;an assignment module, stored in memory, that assigns, based on the effective speed score, the set of control documents and the set of training documents to the group of reviewers; a training module, stored in memory, that trains a predictive model using a set of training reviews performed by the group of reviewers on both the set of training documents and the set of control documents; an evaluation module;
stored in memory, that uses the predictive model to evaluate the set of review documents; andat least one processor that executes the division module, the calculation module, the assignment module, the training module, and the evaluation module. - View Dependent Claims (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19)
-
-
20. A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising one or more computer-executable instructions that, when executed by at least one processor of a computing device, cause the computing device to:
-
divide a set of documents to be reviewed for relevancy into; a set of control documents; a set of training documents; a set of quality-control documents; and a set of review documents; calculate, based on a set of reviews performed by a group of reviewers on the set of quality-control documents, an effective speed score for each reviewer in the group of reviewers, wherein the effective speed score indicates a reviewer'"'"'s ability to accurately complete a review in a given time, wherein accuracy is determined by agreement between the reviewer and other reviewers; assign, based on the effective speed score, the set of control documents and the set of training documents to the group of reviewers; train a predictive model using a set of training reviews performed by the group of reviewers on both the set of training documents and the set of control documents; and use the predictive model to evaluate the set of review documents.
-
Specification