Auxiliary analysis system using expert information and method thereof

• US 10,599,986 B2
• Filed: 05/30/2015
• Issued: 03/24/2020
• Est. Priority Date: 05/30/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Kiddeveloping Co Ltd.
• Original Assignee: Kiddeveloping Co Ltd.
• Inventors: Yang, Yu Ying
• Primary Examiner(s): Vincent, David R
• Application Number:
  US14/726,527
• Publication Number:
  US 20150262065A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,760 Days
• Field of Search: 706 12, 706 15, 706 45
• CPC Class Codes: G06N 5/047 Pattern matching networks; Rete networks
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/20 Education
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/20 for computer-aided diagnosis, e.g. based on medical expert systems

Abstract

An auxiliary analysis system using expert information comprises a user interface and a determination module. The user interface includes a plurality of analysis items which can be triggered by a user. The determination module coupled with the user interface includes a plurality of preliminary results corresponding to the analysis items. Each of the analysis items corresponds to at least one of the preliminary results. The user selects a plurality of analysis items to generate multiple preliminary results, and the preliminary results further generate a final judgment result by an operation process.

Claims

1. An auxiliary analysis system, adapted for performing a psychoanalysis to a first user by using expert information, comprising:

a display;

an analysis database, is configured to record a plurality of analysis items, and a plurality of preliminary result groups respectively corresponding to the plurality of analysis items;

wherein each of the preliminary result groups comprises one or more preliminary results, wherein the analysis database is further configured to record a weighted score of each of the one or more preliminary results in each of the preliminary result groups,

wherein the analysis items respectively indicate a plurality of concrete behaviors, wherein the concrete behaviors are preset according to professional books or the expert information related to the psychoanalysis,

wherein each of the one or more preliminary results of one preliminary result group indicate a reason causing one of the concrete behaviors indicated by one analysis item corresponding to that said one preliminary result group,

wherein a possibility of the reason causing that said one of the concrete behaviors is indicated by the weighted score of that said one of the one or more preliminary results,

wherein the weighted scores of all the one or more preliminary results, and connection relationships between the analysis items and the corresponding one or more preliminary results are predetermined according to the professional books or the expert information related to the psychoanalysis,

a processor, coupled to the display and the analysis database, is configured to show a user interface including the analysis items on the display,

wherein in response to one or more target analysis items among the analysis items are triggered by a selection performed by a second user, the processor is further configured to identify one or more target preliminary result groups respectively corresponding to the one or more target analysis items among the preliminary result groups according to the analysis database, wherein one or more observed behaviors of the first user are one or more target concrete behaviors indicated by the one or more target analysis items,

wherein the processor is further configured to group a plurality of target preliminary results of the one or more target preliminary result groups into a plurality of judgement groups according to a plurality of target reasons indicated by the plurality of target preliminary results, wherein one or more first target preliminary results in the same one of the judgement groups indicate the same one of the target reasons,

wherein the processor is further configured to calculate a total weighted score of each of the judgement groups according to the weighted scores of the target preliminary results grouped in each of the judgement groups,

wherein the processor is further configured to rank the judgement groups, from highest to lowest, according to the total weighted scores of the judgement groups,

wherein the processor is further configured to generate a final judgement result by the ranked judgement groups and show the final judgement result in the user interface on the display, wherein the final judgement result indicates the one or more most possible reasons causing the one or more observed behaviors of the first user, so as to complete the psychoanalysis to the first user.

2. The system, as recited in claim 1, wherein in the operation of calculating a total weighted score of each of the plurality of judgement groups according to the weighted scores of the target preliminary results grouped in each of the plurality of judgement groups,

regarding one of the plurality of judgement groups, the processor sums the weighted scores of the target preliminary results in that said one of judgment groups to obtain a summation as the total weighted score of that said one of the plurality of judgement groups, so as to obtain the total weighted score of each of the plurality of judgement groups.

3. The system, as recited in claim 1, wherein a detailed explanation of the one or more observed behaviors of the first user is provided by the final judgement result, or the final judgement result is further used as references for treatment suggestions regarding the first user.

4. The system, as recited in claim 2, wherein each of the judgment groups respectively has an attribute,

wherein the processor determines whether two of the judgment groups conflict with each other according to the attributes of that said two of the judgment groups,

wherein in response to determining that two of the judgment groups conflict with each other, the processor obtains a difference between the total weighted scores of that said two of the judgment groups conflicting with each other,

wherein the processor renews the total weighted score of the judgment group with the higher weighted score among that said two of the judgment groups according to the difference, removes the judgment group with the lower weighted score among that said two of the judgment groups, and ranks the remaining judgment groups again according to the corresponding total weighted scores.

5. The system, as recited in claim 2, wherein each of the judgment groups respectively has an attribute,

wherein the processor determines whether two of the judgment groups conflict with each other according to the attributes of that said two of the judgment groups,

wherein in response to determining that two of the judgment groups conflict with each other, the processor removes the judgment group with lower total weighted score among that two of the judgment groups from the judgment groups, and ranks the remaining judgment groups again according to the corresponding total weighted scores.

6. The system, as recited in claim 1, wherein in the analysis database,

the connection relationships between the one or more preliminary results of one of the preliminary result groups corresponding to one of the analysis items is recorded through a hierarchical tree structure corresponding to that said one of the analysis items,

wherein the hierarchical tree structure has a root layer and one or more judging layers,

wherein that said one of the analysis items is in the root layer, and the one or more preliminary results corresponding to that said one of the analysis items are in the last one of the one or more judging layers of the hierarchical tree structure corresponding to that said one of the analysis items.

7. The system, as recited in claim 1, wherein

the processor further comprising shows an administrator interface corresponding to the user interface,

wherein the administrator interface including a plurality of edition items for editing the analysis items, the one or more preliminary results corresponding to each of the analysis items, and the weighted scores of each of the one or more preliminary results corresponding to each of the analysis items.

8. The system, as recited in claim 4, wherein

the processor further shows an administrator interface corresponding to the user interface,

wherein the administrator interface including a plurality of edition items for editing the analysis items, the one or more preliminary results corresponding to each of the analysis items, the weighted scores of each of the one or more preliminary results corresponding to each of the analysis items, each of the judgment groups corresponding to each of the one or more preliminary results corresponding to each of the analysis items, and the attributes corresponding to each of the judgment groups.

9. The system, as recited in claim 5, wherein

the processor further shows an administrator interface corresponding to the user interface,

wherein the administrator interface including a plurality of edition items for editing the analysis item, the one or more preliminary results corresponding to each of the analysis items, and the weighted scores of each of the one or more preliminary results corresponding to each of the analysis items.

10. The system, as recited in claim 6, wherein

the processor further shows an administrator interface corresponding to the user interface,

wherein the administrator interface including a plurality of edition items for editing the analysis items, the one or more preliminary results corresponding to each of the analysis items, the weighted scores of each of the preliminary results, and connection relationships between all the nodes of the hierarchical tree structure.

11. An auxiliary analysis method, adapted for an auxiliary analysis system performing a psychoanalysis to a first user by using expert information, the method comprising the steps of:

showing a user interface including a plurality of analysis items on a display of the auxiliary analysis system according to an analysis database of the auxiliary analysis system, wherein the analysis database records the plurality of analysis items, and a plurality of preliminary result groups respectively corresponding to the plurality of analysis items,

wherein each of the preliminary result groups comprises one or more preliminary results, wherein the analysis database further records a weighted score of each of the one or more preliminary results in each of the preliminary result groups,

wherein the analysis items respectively indicate a plurality of concrete behaviors, wherein the concrete behaviors are preset according to professional books or the expert information related to the psychoanalysis,

wherein each of the preliminary results of one preliminary result group indicate a reason causing one of the concrete behaviors which is indicated by one analysis item corresponding to that said one preliminary result group,

wherein a possibility of the reason causing that said one of the concrete behaviors is indicated by the weighted score of that said one of the preliminary results,

wherein the weighted scores of all the preliminary results, and connection relationships between the analysis items and the corresponding preliminary results are predetermined according to the professional books or the expert information related to the psychoanalysis,

in response to one or more target analysis items among the analysis items are triggered by a selection performed by a second user, identifying one or more target preliminary result groups respectively corresponding to the one or more target analysis items among the preliminary result groups according to the analysis database, wherein one or more observed behaviors of the first user are one or more target concrete behaviors indicated by the one or more target analysis items;

grouping a plurality of target preliminary results of the one or more target preliminary result groups into a plurality of judgement groups according to a plurality of target reasons indicated by the plurality of target preliminary results, wherein one or more first target preliminary results in the same one of the judgement groups indicate the same one of the target reasons;

calculating a total weighted score of each of the judgement groups according to the weighted scores of the plurality of target preliminary results grouped in each of the judgement groups;

ranking the judgement groups, from highest to lowest, according to the total weighted scores of the judgement groups;

generating a final judgement result by the ranked judgement groups and show the final judgement result in the user interface on the display, wherein the final judgement result indicates the one or more most possible reasons causing the one or more observed behaviors of the first user, so as to complete the psychoanalysis to the first user.

12. The method, as recited in claim 11, further comprising the steps of:

in response to at least one edition item is triggered, obtaining editing information corresponding to the at least one edition item for editing one of the corresponding analysis item, the corresponding preliminary results, and the weighted scores of each of the corresponding preliminary results; and

saving the edited analysis item, the edited preliminary results and the edited weighted scores respectively.

13. An auxiliary analysis system, adapted for performing a psychoanalysis to a first user by using expert information, comprising:

a display;

an analysis database, is configured to record a plurality of analysis items, and a plurality of preliminary result groups respectively corresponding to the plurality of analysis items;

wherein each of the preliminary result groups comprises one or more preliminary results, wherein the analysis database is further configured to record an attribute and a weighted score of each of the one or more preliminary results in each of the preliminary result groups,

wherein the analysis items respectively indicate a plurality of concrete behaviors, wherein the concrete behaviors are preset according to professional books or the expert information related to the psychoanalysis,

wherein each of the one or more preliminary results of one preliminary result group indicate a reason causing one of the concrete behaviors indicated by one analysis item corresponding to that said one preliminary result group,

wherein a possibility of the reason causing that said one of the concrete behaviors is indicated by the weighted score of that said one of the one or more preliminary results,

wherein the attributes and the weighted scores of all the preliminary results, and connection relationships between the analysis items and the corresponding preliminary results are predetermined according to the professional books or the expert information related to the psychoanalysis,

a processor, coupled to the display and the analysis database, is configured to show a user interface including the analysis items on the display,

wherein in response to one or more target analysis items among the analysis items are triggered by a selection performed by a second user, the processor is further configured to identify one or more target preliminary result groups respectively corresponding to the one or more target analysis items among the plurality of preliminary result groups according to the analysis database, wherein one or more observed behaviors of the first user are one or more target concrete behaviors indicated by the one or more target analysis items,

wherein the processor is further configured to merge two or more target preliminary results in the one or more target preliminary result groups as one merged target preliminary result according to the attributes of the two or more target preliminary results, wherein the attributes of the two or more target preliminary results indicates that the two or more target preliminary results are able to be merged together, wherein the merged target preliminary result is one target preliminary result having the highest weighted score among the two or more target preliminary results,

wherein the processor is further configured to update the weighted score of the merged target preliminary result as a total value calculated by summing the weighted scores of all the two or more target preliminary results,

wherein the processor is further configured to rank the remaining target preliminary results in the one or more target preliminary result groups, from highest to lowest, according to the corresponding weighted scores of the remaining target preliminary results,

wherein the processor is further configured to generate a final judgement result by the ranked remaining target preliminary results and show the final judgement result in the user interface on the display, wherein the final judgement result indicates the one or more most possible reasons causing the one or more observed behaviors of the first user, so as to complete the psychoanalysis to the first user.

14. The system, as recited in claim 13, wherein

the processor further shows an administrator interface corresponding to the user interface,

wherein the administrator interface including a plurality of edition items for editing the analysis items, the one or more preliminary results corresponding to each of the analysis items, and the attributes and the weighted scores of each of the one or more preliminary results corresponding to each of the analysis items.

15. The system, as recited in claim 13, wherein

in response to determining that the attributes of two further target preliminary results in the one or more target preliminary result groups are conflicting with each other, the processor calculate a difference value between the weighted scores of the two further target preliminary results, updates the weighted score of one of the two further target preliminary results having the higher weighted score as the difference value, removes another of the two further target preliminary results, and ranks the remaining target preliminary results in the one or more target preliminary result groups according to the weighted scores of the remaining target preliminary results.

16. The system, as recited in claim 13, wherein

in response to determining that the attributes of two further target preliminary results in the one or more target preliminary result groups are conflicting with each other, the processor removes one of the two further target preliminary results having the lower weighted score, and ranks the remaining target preliminary results in the one or more target preliminary result groups according to the weighted scores of the remaining target preliminary results.

17. The system, as recited in claim 13, wherein

a detailed explanation of the one or more observed behaviors of the first user is provided by the final judgement result, or

the final judgement result is further used as references for treatment suggestions regarding the first user.

18. The system, as recited in claim 13, wherein in the analysis database,

the connection relationships between the one or more preliminary results of one of the preliminary result groups corresponding to one of the analysis items is recorded through a hierarchical tree structure corresponding to that said one of the analysis items,

wherein the hierarchical tree structure has a root layer and one or more judging layers,

wherein that said one of the analysis items is in the root layer, and the one or more plurality of preliminary results corresponding to that said one of the analysis items are in the last one of the one or more judging layers of the hierarchical tree structure corresponding to that said one of the analysis items.