Vehicle sliding closure non-contact obstacle detection system

• US 10,604,984 B2
• Filed: 02/14/2018
• Issued: 03/31/2020
• Est. Priority Date: 02/17/2017
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Magna Closures Company Limited (Magna International Incorporated)
• Original Assignee: Magna Closures Company Limited (Magna International Incorporated)
• Inventors: Schatz, Kurt M., Baruco, Samuel R., Caron, Stephen James
• Primary Examiner(s): Nguyen, Tan Q
• Application Number:
  US15/896,402
• Publication Number:
  US 20180238094A1
• Time in Patent Office: 776 Days
• Field of Search: 701 49
• CPC Class Codes: E05F 15/431 specially adapted for vehicle windows or roofs
• CPC Class Codes: E05F 2015/436 the beam being parallel to the wing edge
• CPC Class Codes: E05Y 2900/55 Windows

Abstract

A non-contact obstacle detection (NCOD) system for an opening in a vehicle includes a cover panel, such as a glass pane, slidable between opened and closed positions within the opening. The system includes one or more infrared time-of-flight (IR-TOF) sensors which measure the length of a beam of infrared light by measuring the time that the infrared light in the beam takes to travel the length of the beam and to reflect back to the sensor. The IR-TOF sensors may be configured to provide a beam of light along either the side edge of the frame parallel to the sliding direction or a terminal edge generally transverse to the sliding direction. Methods are provided for detecting obstacles within the opening of the frame by controllers using the lengths of beams from each of those different beam configurations, and for self-calibrating the system.

Claims

1. A non-contact obstacle detection system for an opening in a vehicle comprising:

a cover panel slidable in a sliding direction from an open position to a closed position;

a frame defining an opening including a first side edge generally parallel to the sliding direction, and a terminal edge generally transverse to the sliding direction;

wherein the cover panel includes a leading edge abutting the terminal edge with the cover panel in the closed position to completely enclose the opening in the frame, and wherein the leading edge is spaced apart from the terminal edge in the open position;

a first IR-TOF sensor disposed adjacent the terminal edge of the frame and providing a first beam within the opening along and adjacent to the first side edge and reflecting from the leading edge of the cover panel for detecting an obstacle within the opening between the first IR-TOF sensor and the cover panel as the cover panel is moved toward the closed position;

a first controller in communication with the first IR-TOF sensor and configured to detect the obstacle within the opening by sensing an actual length of the first beam.

2. The non-contact obstacle detection system of claim 1, wherein the cover panel includes a pane of glass.

3. The non-contact obstacle detection system of claim 1, wherein the first controller is configured to detect the obstacle within the opening by sensing the actual length of the first beam shorter than an expected length of the first beam.

4. The non-contact obstacle detection system of claim 1, wherein the first controller is configured to calculate an actual closing velocity as a rate of change of the actual length of the first beam over time;

and

wherein the first controller is configured to detect the obstacle within the opening by sensing the actual closing velocity being less than a predetermined closing velocity.

5. The non-contact obstacle detection system of claim 1, wherein the first controller is configured to calculate an actual closing velocity as a rate of change of the actual length of the first beam over time;

and

wherein the first controller is configured to detect the obstacle within the opening by sensing a reduction in the actual closing velocity prior to the cover panel being in the closed positon.

6. The non-contact obstacle detection system of claim 1, wherein the first controller is configured to calculate an actual closing velocity as the rate of change of the actual length of the first beam over time;

and

wherein the first controller is configured to detect the obstacle within the opening by sensing the actual closing velocity being greater than an interruption velocity indicative of a sudden change in the actual length of the first beam caused by the insertion of the obstacle between the first IR-TOF sensor and the cover panel.

7. The non-contact obstacle detection system of claim 1, further including:

a second side edge of the frame parallel and spaced apart from the first side edge;

a second IR-TOF sensor disposed adjacent the terminal edge of the frame and providing a second beam within the frame along and adjacent to the second side edge and reflecting from the leading edge of the cover panel for detecting the obstacle within the opening as the cover panel is moved toward the closed position; and

a second controller in communication with the second IR-TOF sensor and configured to detect the obstacle within the opening by sensing an actual length of the second beam.

8. The non-contact obstacle detection system of claim 7, wherein the second controller is configured to calculate an actual closing velocity as the rate of change of the actual length of the second beam over time;

and

wherein the controller is configured to detect the obstacle within the opening by sensing the actual closing velocity being less than a predetermined closing velocity.

9. The non-contact obstacle detection system of claim 7, wherein the second controller is configured to calculate an actual closing velocity as the rate of change of the actual length of the second beam over time;

and

wherein the controller is configured to detect the obstacle within the opening by sensing a reduction in the actual closing velocity prior to the cover panel being in the closed positon.

10. The non-contact obstacle detection system of claim 7, wherein the second controller is configured to calculate an actual closing velocity as a rate of change of the actual length of the second beam over time;

and

wherein the second controller is configured to detect the obstacle within the opening by sensing the actual closing velocity being greater than an interruption velocity indicative of a sudden change in the actual length of the second beam caused by the insertion of the obstacle between the second IR-TOF sensor and the cover panel.

11. The non-contact obstacle detection system of claim 1, further including:

a third IR-TOF sensor disposed adjacent the terminal edge of the frame and providing a third beam within the frame along and adjacent to the terminal edge for detecting an obstacle within the opening as the cover panel is moved toward the closed position; and

a third controller in communication with the third IR-TOF sensor and configured to detect an obstacle within the opening by sensing an actual length of the third beam shorter than a predetermined length approximately equal to a length of the terminal edge.

12. The non-contact obstacle detection system of claim 11, wherein the third controller is configured to ignore the actual length of the third beam with the cover panel in a position to block the third beam.

13. The non-contact obstacle detection system of claim 1, further including a contact-type obstacle detection device disposed within the frame and responsive to a contact force indicative of an obstacle within the opening as the cover panel moves toward the closed position.

14. A method for a non-contact obstacle detection system for a cover panel slidable in a sliding direction between an open position and a closed position within a frame of a vehicle, the method comprising the steps of:

detecting the cover panel closing;

generating a first beam parallel to the sliding direction along and adjacent to a first side edge of the frame by a first IR-TOF sensor;

reflecting the first beam off a leading edge of the cover panel and back to the first IR-TOF sensor;

measuring a length of the first beam across the first side edge between the first IR-TOF sensor and the cover panel by the first IR-TOF sensor;

detecting an obstacle within the opening by a first controller using the actual length of the first beam as measured by the first IR-TOF sensor; and

signaling by the first controller for an actuator to stop closing the cover panel in response to the detection of an obstacle within the opening.

15. The method for a non-contact obstacle detection system of claim 14, wherein the step of detecting an obstacle within the opening by the first controller using the actual length of the first beam as measured by the first IR-TOF sensor further includes:

calculating an actual closing velocity as a change in the measured length of the first beam over time; and

sensing the actual closing velocity being less than an expected closing velocity of the cover panel.

16. The method for a non-contact obstacle detection system of claim 15, wherein the expected closing velocity is static and does not vary.

17. The method for a non-contact obstacle detection system of claim 15, further including:

self-calibrating the non-contact obstacle detection system by updating the expected closing velocity of the cover panel using the actual closing velocity of the cover panel.

18. The method for a non-contact obstacle detection system of claim 14, wherein the step of detecting an obstacle within the opening by the first controller using the actual length of the first beam as measured by the first IR-TOF sensor further includes:

calculating an actual closing velocity as a change in the measured length of the first beam over time; and

sensing the actual closing velocity being greater than an interruption velocity indicative of a sudden change in the actual length of the first beam caused by the insertion of the obstacle between the first IR-TOF sensor and the cover panel.

19. The method for a non-contact obstacle detection system of claim 14 wherein the step of detecting an obstacle within the opening by the first controller using the actual length of the first beam as measured by the first IR-TOF sensor further includes:

sensing the actual length of the first beam shorter than an expected length of the first beam.

20. The method for a non-contact obstacle detection system of claim 19, wherein the expected length of the first beam is determined based on an initial position and an expected position resulting from a nominal speed of the cover panel times the amount of time that the cover panel is moved toward the closed position.