Migration of centralized routing components of logical router

• US 10,616,045 B2
• Filed: 03/06/2017
• Issued: 04/07/2020
• Est. Priority Date: 12/22/2016
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Nicira Incorporated (Broadcom, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Nicira Incorporated (Broadcom, Inc.)
• Inventors: Dubey, Ankur, Goliya, Abhishek
• Primary Examiner(s): Celani, Nicholas P
• Application Number:
  US15/451,372
• Publication Number:
  US 20180183667A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,128 Days
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/0663 Performing the actions predefined by failover planning, e.g. switching to standby network elements
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/10 Active monitoring, e.g. heartbeat, ping or trace-route
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 45/28 using route fault recovery

Abstract

Some embodiments provide a method for a controller that manages a physical network that implements multiple logical networks that include multiple logical routers. The method receives a command to change a particular centralized routing component of a logical router to an inactive state. At least two centralized routing components of the logical router are implemented on at least two different host machines in the physical network. The method identifies a host machine on which the particular centralized routing component operates. Other centralized routing components of other logical routers also operate on the identified host machine. The method sends a message to the identified host machine to cause the particular centralized routing component to change to an inactive state, without modifying a state of the identified host machine or the other centralized routing components operating on the identified host machine.

Claims

1. For a controller that manages a physical network that implements a plurality of logical networks comprising a plurality of logical routers, a method comprising:

receiving a command to migrate a particular centralized routing component of a logical router from a first host computer on which the particular centralized routing component operates to a second host computer, wherein at least one other centralized routing component of the logical router is implemented on at least one other host computer in the physical network, wherein the particular centralized routing component operates with an administrative state set to active that is shared with the at least one other centralized routing component of the logical router;

identifying the first host computer on which the particular centralized routing component operates, wherein at least one other centralized routing component of another logical router also operates on the identified first host computer; and

of the host computers on which centralized routing components operate, directing only the identified first host computer to cause the particular centralized routing component (i) to change to an inactive administrative state in order to facilitate migration of the particular centralized routing component and (ii) to share the change to the inactive administrative state with the at least one other centralized routing component of the logical router, wherein the at least one other centralized routing component of the logical router uses the administrative state of the particular centralized routing component along with administrative states of the at least one other centralized routing component to determine an active centralized routing component for the logical router.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising directing the second host computer to initiate setup of the particular centralized routing component on the second host computer.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein:

the particular centralized routing component is a first centralized routing component of the logical router and is operating as an active centralized routing component for the logical router prior to receiving directions from the controller; and

a second centralized routing component operates as a standby centralized routing component for the logical router on a third host computer prior to the first centralized component receiving directions from the controller.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein each of the centralized routing components comprises an internal state that indicates whether it is an active centralized routing component or a standby centralized routing component, wherein the first centralized routing component, upon changing to an inactive administrative state, automatically changes its internal state to operate as a standby centralized routing component for the logical router rather than as an active centralized routing component.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the first host computer, sends a message to the third host computer indicating that the first centralized routing component has changed to the inactive administrative state.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the subsequent behavior of the second centralized routing component depends on whether the centralized routing components for the logical router operate in a preemptive mode or a non-preemptive mode.

7. The method of claim 5, wherein the centralized routing components for the logical router operate in preemptive mode, wherein after the first host computer sends the message to the third host computer:

the second centralized routing component changes its internal state to operate as an active centralized routing component for the logical router rather than as a standby centralized routing component;

the first centralized routing component is migrated to the second host computer;

the first centralized routing component operating on the second host computer automatically changes its internal state to operate as an active centralized routing component;

the second host computer sends a message to the third host computer indicating that the first centralized routing component has changed its internal state to active; and

the second centralized routing component changes its internal state to operate again as a standby centralized routing component in response to the message from the second host computer.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the first centralized routing component is designated as a primary node of a cluster for the logical router and the second centralized routing component is designated as a secondary node of the cluster.

9. The method of claim 5, wherein the centralized routing components for the logical router operate in non-preemptive mode, wherein after the first host computer sends the message to the third host computer:

the second centralized routing component changes its internal state to operate as an active centralized routing component for the logical router rather than as a standby centralized routing component;

the first centralized routing component is migrated to the second host computer; and

the first centralized routing component automatically operates on the second host computer as a standby centralized routing component.

20. The method of claim 5, wherein the first host computer sends the message to the third host computer using a bidirectional forwarding detection (BFD) packet.

10. A non-transitory machine readable medium storing a controller program which when executed by at least one processing unit manages a physical network that implements a plurality of logical networks comprising a plurality of logical routers, the program comprising sets of instructions for:

receiving a command to migrate a particular centralized routing component of a logical router from a first host computer on which the particular centralized routing component operates to a second host computer, wherein at least one other centralized routing component of the logical router is implemented on at least one other host computer in the physical network, wherein the particular centralized routing component operates with an administrative state set to active that is shared with the at least one other centralized routing component of the logical router;

identifying the first host computer on which the particular centralized routing component operates, wherein at least one other centralized routing component of another logical router also operates on the identified first host computer; and

of the host computers on which centralized routing components operate, directing only the identified first host computer to cause the particular centralized routing component (i) to change to an inactive administrative state in order to facilitate migration of the particular centralized routing component and (ii) to share the change to the inactive administrative state with the at least one other centralized routing component of the logical router, wherein the at least one other centralized routing component of the logical router uses the administrative state of the particular centralized routing component along with administrative states of the at least one other centralized routing component to determine an active centralized routing component for the logical router.

11. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 10, wherein the program further comprises a set of instructions for directing the second host computer to initiate setup of the particular centralized routing component on the second host computer.

12. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 10, wherein:

the particular centralized routing component is a first centralized routing component of the logical router and is operating as an active centralized routing component for the logical router prior to receiving directions from the controller; and

a second centralized routing component operates as a standby centralized routing component for the logical router on a third host computer prior to the first centralized component receiving directions from the controller.

13. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 12, wherein each of the centralized routing components comprises an internal state that indicates whether it is an active centralized routing component or a standby centralized routing component, wherein the first centralized routing component, upon changing to an inactive administrative state, automatically changes its internal state to operate as a standby centralized routing component for the logical router rather than as an active centralized routing component.

14. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 13, wherein the first host computer sends a message to the third host computer indicating that the first centralized routing component has changed to the inactive administrative state.

15. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 14, wherein the subsequent behavior of the second centralized routing component depends on whether the centralized routing components for the logical router operate in a preemptive mode or a non-preemptive mode.

16. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 14, wherein the centralized routing components for the logical router operate in preemptive mode, wherein after the first host computer sends the message to the third host computer:

the second centralized routing component changes its internal state to operate as an active centralized routing component for the logical router rather than as a standby centralized routing component;

the first centralized routing component is migrated to the second host computer;

the first centralized routing component operating on the second host computer automatically changes its internal state to operate as an active centralized routing component;

the second host computer sends a message to the third host computer indicating that the first centralized routing component has changed its internal state to active; and

the second centralized routing component changes its internal state to operate again as a standby centralized routing component in response to the message from the second host computer.

17. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 16, wherein the first centralized routing component is designated as a primary node of a cluster for the logical router and the second centralized routing component is designated as a secondary node of the cluster.

18. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 14, wherein the centralized routing components for the logical router operate in non-preemptive mode, wherein after the first host computer sends the message to the third host computer:

the second centralized routing component changes its internal state to operate as an active centralized routing component for the logical router rather than as a standby centralized routing component;

the first centralized routing component is migrated to the second host computer; and

the first centralized routing component automatically operates on the second host computer as a standby centralized routing component.

19. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 14, wherein the first host computer sends the message to the third host computer using a bidirectional forwarding detection (BFD) packet.