Leak detection a vapor handling system

• US 20010029933A1
• Filed: 02/21/2001
• Published: 10/18/2001
• Est. Priority Date: 02/22/2000
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Siemens Canada Limited (Siemens AG)
• Original Assignee: Siemens Canada Limited (Siemens AG)
• Inventors: Fabre, Laurent
• Granted Patent: US 6,658,923 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 123/520
• CPC Class Codes: F02M 25/0809 Judging failure of purge control system

Abstract

A method of leak detection in a closed vapor handling system of an automotive vehicle while an engine is running, implemented by a system, the method including providing a pressure sensing element that obtains at least one pressure signal, closing a control valve and a shut off valve to seal the system from the engine and an atmosphere, generating a vacuum by opening the control valve, analyzing the at least one pressure signal at threshold times, comparing the at least one pressure signal to at least one pressure control value, and determining a leak condition if the at least one pressure signal is not less than the at least one pressure control value. The system including a pressure sensing element, a control valve, a shut off valve, a processor operatively coupled to the pressure sensing element and the shut off valve and receiving pressure signals from the pressure sensing element and sending signals to the control valve and the shut off valve. The processor closes the control valve and the shut off valve, generates a vacuum, depressurizes the system using the vacuum, controls the vacuum by opening the control valve, analyzes the pressure signal at threshold times, compares the pressure signal to pressure control values, and determines a leak condition.

Claims

1. A method of leak detection in a closed vapor handling system of an automotive vehicle while an engine is running comprising:

providing a pressure sensing element that obtains at least one pressure signal;

closing a control valve and a shut off valve to seal the system from the engine and an atmosphere;

generating a vacuum by opening the control valve;

analyzing the at least one pressure signal at threshold times;

comparing the at least one pressure signal to at least one pressure control value; and

determining a leak condition if the at least one pressure signal is not less than the at least one pressure control value.

2. The method of

claim 1

further comprising:

monitoring for malfunction of a component in the system.

3. The method of

claim 1

wherein the providing comprises:

using a differential tank pressure sensor that supplies differential pressure between a pressure in the system and atmospheric pressure.

4. The method of

claim 1

wherein the analyzing comprises:

computing a pressure differential between a first and second pressure signal.

5. The method of

claim 1

wherein the providing comprises:

using a pressure switch that moves at the at least one pressure control value.

6. The method of

claim 1

wherein the providing comprises:

using a pair of pressure switches that move at different pressure control values having a high vacuum threshold.

7. The method of

claim 1

wherein the closing comprises:

providing a canister purge control valve.

8. The method of

claim 1

wherein the closing comprises:

closing the control valve;

waiting for a first period of time;

closing the shut off valve; and

waiting for a second period of time.

9. The method of

claim 1

further comprising:

providing an engine management system to receive the at least one pressure signal from the pressure sensing element and send signals to the control valve and the shut off valve to open and close the valves.

10. The method of

claim 1

wherein the determining comprises:

detecting a leak of about 1 millimeter.

11. The method of

claim 1

further comprising:

determining a no leak condition if the at least one pressure signal is less than the at least one pressure control value.

12. The method of

claim 1

wherein the analyzing comprises:

evaluating a pressure slope; and

calculating a corrected pressure slope using a correction value for vapor generation.

13. The method of

claim 12

wherein the comparing comprises:

determining a leak diameter by comparing the corrected pressure slope to pressure control values within threshold times.

14. The method of

claim 1

wherein the generating comprises:

depressurizing the system using the vacuum; and

controlling the vacuum by opening and closing the control valve.

15. The method of

claim 1

further comprising:

determining a pressure sensor offset;

estimating a correction value for vapor generation;

aborting the leak detection if the correction value is greater than a control correction value;

calculating a pressure mean value;

dropping the pressure to a first threshold pressure by opening the control valve for a third period of time;

detecting a tank cap missing condition if a second threshold pressure is not reached within the third period of time;

detecting a large leak condition if the pressure drops below the second threshold pressure and above the first threshold pressure within the third period of time;

aborting the leak detection if the speed of the automotive vehicle is greater than zero; and

ending the leak detection if a fuel volume is not within a control volume range.

16. The method of

claim 1

wherein the comparing comprises:

evaluating whether the at least one pressure signal is greater than or equal to the pressure control value within a threshold time.

17. A method of leak detection in a closed vapor handling system of an automotive vehicle while an engine is running comprising:

providing differential tank pressure sensor that provides pressure;

closing a canister purge control valve to seal the system from the engine and an atmosphere;

waiting for a first period of time;

closing a shut off valve;

waiting for a second period of time;

determining a pressure sensor offset;

estimating a correction value for vapor generation;

aborting the leak detection if the correction value is greater than a control correction value;

calculating a pressure mean value;

dropping the pressure to a first threshold pressure by opening the control valve for a third period of time;

detecting a tank cap missing condition if a second threshold pressure is not reached within the third period of time;

detecting a large leak condition if the pressure drops below the second threshold pressure and above the first threshold pressure within the third period of time;

aborting the leak detection if the speed of the automotive vehicle is greater than zero;

ending the leak detection if a fuel volume is not within a control volume range;

evaluating a pressure slope over a fourth period of time;

calculating a corrected pressure slope using the correction value for vapor generation; and

determining a leak diameter by comparing the corrected pressure slope to pressure control values within threshold times.

18. An automotive evaporative leak detection system comprising:

a pressure sensing element;

a control valve;

a shut off valve;

a processor operatively coupled to the pressure sensing element, the control valve, and the shut off valve and receiving pressure signals from the pressure sensing element and sending signals to the control valve and the shut off valve;

wherein the processor closes the control valve and the shut off valve, generates a vacuum, analyzes the pressure signal at threshold times, compares the pressure signal to pressure control values, and determines a leak condition.

19. The system of

claim 18

wherein the pressure switch is in fluid communication with fuel tank vapor.

20. The system of

claim 18

wherein the processor is in communication with the pressure sensing element.

21. The system of

claim 18

wherein the pressure sensing element moves at a given relative vacuum.

22. The system of

claim 18

wherein the pressure sensing element is located on a conduit between a fuel tank and a canister.

23. The system of

claim 18

wherein the pressure sensing element comprises a pair of switches that move at different relative vacuums having a high vacuum threshold.

24. The system of

claim 18

wherein the pressure sensing element comprises a differential tank pressure sensor located on a conduit between a fuel tank and a canister.

25. The system of

claim 18

wherein the control valve comprises a canister purge control valve.

26. The system of

claim 18

further comprising:

a fuel tank communicating with an engine; and

a canister communicating with the fuel tank, the engine and an atmosphere, the pressure sensing element located between the fuel tank and the canister, the shut off valve located between the canister and the atmosphere, the control valve located between the canister and the engine.

27. An automotive evaporative leak detection system comprising:

a differential tank pressure sensor located on a conduit between a fuel tank and a canister, the canister communicating with an engine and an atmosphere, the fuel tank communicating with the engine;

a shut off valve located between the canister and the atmosphere;

a control valve located between the canister and the engine; and

a processor operatively coupled to the differential tank pressure sensor and the shut off valve and receiving pressure signals from the differential tank pressure sensor and sending signals to the control valve and the shut off valve;

wherein the processor closes the control valve, waits for a period of time, closes a shut off valve, determines a pressure sensor offset, estimates a correction value for vapor generation, calculates a pressure mean value, drops the pressure to a threshold pressure, detects a tank cap missing condition, detects a large leak condition, aborts the diagnosis, evaluates a pressure slope, calculates a corrected pressure slope, and determines a leak diameter by comparing the corrected pressure slope to pressure control values within threshold times.