FUEL CONTROL SYSTEM WITH PURGE GAS MODELING AND INTEGRATION

• US 20010032637A1
• Filed: 03/08/1999
• Published: 10/25/2001
• Est. Priority Date: 03/08/1999
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Delphi Technologies Ip Limited (BorgWarner Incorporated)
• Original Assignee: Delphi Technologies, Inc. (BorgWarner Incorporated)
• Inventors: GRIEVE, MALCOLM JAMES, QIAO, NINGSHENG, HIMES, EDWARD GEORGE
• Granted Patent: US 6,321,735 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 123/674
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 2041/1409 using at least a proportional, integral or derivative controller
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/0042 Controlling the combustible mixture as a function of the canister purging, e.g. control of injected fuel to compensate for deviation of air fuel ratio when purging
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/0045 Estimating, calculating or determining the purging rate, amount, flow or concentration
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/047 Taking into account fuel evaporation or wall wetting; special correction after fuel cut-off F02D41/126
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/1402 Adaptive control
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/2451 characterised by what is learned or calibrated
• CPC Class Codes: F02M 25/08 adding fuel vapours drawn from engine fuel reservoir electrical control of purge system F02D41/003

Abstract

A fuel control system that estimates the fuel quantity received from purging of an evaporative emission control system and then accounts for the purge fuel in determining the amount of fuel to be injected into a cylinder of an internal combustion engine. Purge fuel quantity is represented by a purge equivalence ratio which is computed based upon an estimate of the hydrocarbon concentration in the purge gas. The hydrocarbon concentration is adaptively learned using an iterative routine that updates the estimate based on the integrated error between the actual and desired air/fuel ratios. Wall wetting and closed loop corrections are applied only to the non-purge fuel portion of the total fuel delivered to the engine cylinder. The closed loop control includes a block learn memory that provides a correction to the factory fuel calibration. The hydrocarbon concentration is updated using the integrated error during purging, whereas the block learn memory is updated using the integrated error during periods when no purging is occurs. The evaporative emission control system includes a solenoid-operated purge valve that is controlled in a manner that provides improved fuel control during transient conditions. The solenoid duty cycle is controlled using a purge factor that operates to reduce the duty cycle when the intake airflow rate drops significantly.

Claims

1. A method of controlling the amount of fuel injected into a cylinder of an internal combustion engine to account for fuel vapors contained in purge gas inducted into the cylinder during purging of an evaporative emission control system that includes a charcoal canister which stores evaporative emissions from a fuel tank, the method comprising the steps of:

determining a first data value that is related to the concentration of fuel vapors contained in the purge gas,

obtaining a second data value that is related to a desired total quantity of fuel to be delivered to the cylinder,

using said first and second data values to determine a third data value that relates to an amount of non-purge fuel to be delivered to the cylinder during purging of the charcoal canister,

determining a fourth data value that is related to an amount of fuel to be supplied by a fuel injector, wherein said fourth data value is determined by applying one or more corrections to said third data value, and

operating the fuel injector using a fuel injector control signal that is determined using said fourth data value.

2. The method of

claim 1

, wherein said first data value comprises a purge equivalence ratio that represents the percentage of total fuel delivered to the cylinder that is contained in the purge gas.

3. The method of

claim 2

, wherein said step of determining a first data value further comprises calculating the purge equivalence ratio using a fifth data value indicative of the concentration of fuel vapors contained in the purge gas.

4. The method of

claim 3

, further comprising the step of iteratively determining said fifth data value using closed loop feedback during purging.

5. The method of

claim 2

, wherein said step of determining a first data value further comprises calculating the purge equivalence ratio in accordance

6. The method of

claim 1

, wherein said step of determining a fourth data value further comprises applying a wall wetting correction to said third data value, whereby said wall wetting correction is only applied to the non-purge fuel portion of the total quantity of fuel being delivered to the cylinder.

7. The method of

claim 1

, wherein the step of determining a first data value further comprises determining said first data value using a fifth data value that is indicative of the concentration of fuel vapors contained in the purge gas, and wherein the method further comprises the step of iteratively updating said fifth data value using closed loop feedback during purging.

8. The method of

claim 7

, wherein said step of determining a fourth data value further comprises applying a closed loop correction to said third data value, and wherein the method further comprises the step of using said closed loop feedback to iteratively update said closed loop correction during periods when no purging occurs, whereby said closed loop control is used to update the data value indicative of purge fuel during purging and is used to update the closed loop correction during periods when no purging occurs.

9. The method of

claim 8

, wherein said closed loop correction comprises data stored in a block learn memory.

10. The method of

claim 7

, wherein said closed loop feedback comprises an integral error term, and wherein the method further comprises the step of generating said integral error term by determining the air/fuel ratio of exhaust gases ejected from the cylinder after combustion, calculating the error between said air/fuel ratio and a desired air/fuel ratio, and summing the error with an integral error term determined during a previous iteration of said closed loop feedback.

11. A method of controlling the amount of fuel injected into a cylinder of an internal combustion engine to account for fuel vapors contained in purge gas inducted into the cylinder during purging of an evaporative emission control system that includes a charcoal canister which stores evaporative emissions from a fuel tank, the method comprising the steps of:

determining a first data value that is related to the concentration of fuel vapors contained in the purge gas,

determining a second data value that is related to the amount of non-purge fuel to be delivered to the cylinder,

calculating a third data value using said second data value and a closed loop correction factor,

injecting fuel into the cylinder for subsequent combustion, wherein the quantity of injected fuel is determined in accordance with said third data value,

generating a closed loop feedback using a measurement of gases exhausted from the cylinder following combustion, and

using said feedback to iteratively update said first data value during purging and to iteratively update said correction factor during periods when no purging occurs.

12. The method of

claim 11

, wherein said closed loop correction factor comprises a data value stored in block learn memory.

13. The method of

claim 11

, wherein said first data value is bounded by an upper and lower limit, and wherein said correction factor is updated during purging only if said first data value is at either said upper or lower limit.

14. The method of

claim 11

, wherein said first data value comprises a purge fuel concentration value.

15. The method of

claim 14

, wherein updates to said correction factor and purge fuel concentration value are done incrementally, with the size of the increment for said purge concentration value being determined such that the magnitude of the change in fuel delivered to the cylinder due to said increment is substantially the same as the magnitude of the change in fuel delivered due to an increment of said correction factor.

16. A method for determining the concentration of fuel vapor contained in purge gas inducted into a cylinder of an internal combustion engine during purging of an evaporative emission control system, the method comprising the steps of:

(a) obtaining a data value representative of the concentration of purge fuel vapors in the purge gas,

(b) operating a purge valve to permit the purge gas to be drawn into the cylinder of the internal combustion engine,

(c) determining an additional amount of fuel to be injected into the cylinder using said data value,

(d) injecting said additional fuel into the cylinder, and

(e) adjusting said data value if the total amount of fuel provided to the cylinder is greater than or less than a desired amount of fuel.

17. The method of

claim 16

, wherein said data value represents the hydrocarbon concentration [HC] of the purge gas and wherein step (e) further comprises:

(e1) determining an error related to the difference between said total amount of fuel and said desired amount of fuel, wherein said error is determined using a measurement of exhaust gases produced by combustion of said purge fuel and said additional fuel, and

(e2) adjusting said data value using said error.

18. The method of

claim 17

, further comprising the step of iteratively repeating steps (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e1) and integrating the error over the course of a number of said iterations, wherein step (e2) further comprises adjusting said data value when the integrated error exceeds a selected value.

19. The method of

claim 16

, wherein step (e) comprises:

monitoring the exhaust gases produced by combustion of said purge fuel and said additional fuel using a sensor that generates a signal indicative of the air/fuel ratio of said exhaust gases,

converting said signal to a feedback value,

comparing said feedback value to a desired value indicative of a desired air/fuel ratio, and

adjusting said data value if said feedback value is greater than or less than said desired value.

20. The method of

claim 16

, further comprising the step of providing a charcoal canister and a canister vent valve that is coupled to the charcoal canister to permit control of the flow of atmospheric air through the canister, wherein the charcoal canister is coupled to receive and store fuel vapors from a fuel tank that holds fuel used by the engine.

21. The method of

claim 20

, wherein said data value comprises a canister concentration value and wherein step (b) further comprises maintaining the canister vent valve in an open position during operation of the purge valve to thereby permit purging of the canister by drawing atmospheric air through the canister.

22. The method of

claim 20

, wherein said data value comprises a fuel tank concentration value and wherein step (b) further comprises maintaining the canister vent valve in a closed position during operation of the purge valve to thereby permit air and fuel vapors from the fuel tank to be drawn through the canister and into the cylinder of the internal combustion engine.

23. A method of controlling a solenoid-actuated charcoal canister purge valve to limit the portion of fuel that is supplied via the purge valve to a cylinder of an internal combustion engine, the method comprising the steps of:

determining a duty cycle for use in energizing the solenoid-actuated purge valve, said duty cycle being determined in accordance with an intake airflow and a purge factor,

energizing the solenoid-actuated purge valve using the duty cycle to thereby supply a quantity of purge fuel to the cylinder,

supplying an additional quantity of fuel to the cylinder, whereby the total fuel supplied to the cylinder includes said purge fuel and said additional quantity of fuel,

determining a purge equivalent ratio that is related to the percentage of the total fuel that comprises purge fuel, and

decreasing said purge factor if said purge equivalence ratio is greater than a selected percentage and increasing said purge factor if said purge equivalence ratio is less than a selected percentage.

24. The method of

claim 23

, wherein said duty cycle has a minimum value (min) and a maximum value (max) that varies in accordance with said intake airflow and wherein said duty cycle is determined using said purge factor (pf) in accordance with the following equation:

duty cycle=pf (max−

min)+min.

25. The method of

claim 23

, wherein said purge factor has a maximum value that varies in accordance with said intake airflow.