Management of enterprise communications

• US 20010037364A1
• Filed: 03/05/2001
• Published: 11/01/2001
• Est. Priority Date: 05/10/2000
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Electronic Data Systems Corporation (Perspecta, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Electronic Data Systems Corporation (Perspecta, Inc.)
• Inventors: Yates, David A., Mester, Betsy M., Joachim, Margaret J., Jarvis, Neil A., Henderson, Saundre K., Michalek, Nancy R., Fertenbaugh, Cynthia S., Erbelding, James C.
• Application Number:
  US09/799,740
• Publication Number:
  US 20010037364A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 709/204
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management

Abstract

One aspect of the invention is a method for managing an enterprise'"'"'s communications. A plurality of issues is identified on which to manage communications. For each of the plurality of issues, a communications list is created comprising at least one person that is to be informed of an issue. For at least one of the plurality of issues, the communications list is organized hierarchically. For at least one of the plurality of issues, criterion is established as to when information about the at least one of the plurality of issues should be communicated to a level higher, lower, or across the hierarchy of the communications list.

Claims

1. A method for managing an enterprise'"'"'s communications, comprising:

identifying a plurality of issues on which to manage communications;

for each of the plurality of issues, creating a communications list comprising at least one person that is to be informed of an issue;

for at least one of the plurality of issues, organizing the communications list hierarchically;

for the at least one of the plurality of issues, establishing a first criterion identifying when information about the at least one of the plurality of issues should be communicated to a level higher in the hierarchy of the communications list,

establishing a second criterion identifying when information about the at least one of the plurality of issues should be communicated to a level lower in the hierarchy of the communications list

establishing a third criterion identifying when information about the at least one of the plurality of issues should be communicated across the hierarchy of the communications list.

2. The method of

claim 1

, further comprising:

for the at least one of the plurality of issues, identifying actions that should be taken in response to the issue.

3. The method of

claim 1

, further comprising:

for the at least one of the plurality of issues, compiling information representing the at least one of the plurality of issues, the communications list organized hierarchically, and first, second, and third criterion into a tangible medium of expression.

4. The method of

claim 1

, wherein at least one of the first criterion, second criterion, and third criterion require human judgment as to whether information about the at least one of the plurality of issues should be communicated.

5. The method of

claim 1

, wherein organizing the communications list hierarchically further comprises:

identifying a plurality of groups comprising at least one member wherein the members of a group comprise one or more persons on the communications list;

organizing the plurality of groups hierarchically.

6. The method of

claim 5

, wherein the groups are organized in a tree structure.

7. The method of

claim 5

, wherein each group has an electronic group mailbox associated with it.

8. The method of

claim 7

, wherein the electronic group mailbox is managed by at least one person with decision making authority for the group.

9. The method of

claim 5

, wherein items in the group mailbox may be read and responded to from a plurality of computers at a plurality of physical locations.

10. The method of

claim 9

, wherein items in the group mailbox may only be read and responded to from a single computer at any particular time.

11. The method of

claim 1

, wherein the plurality of issues comprises a set of issues related to a subject selected from the group consisting of the deployment of a new system, the deployment of a new service, the response to a crisis, the location of expertise, the implementation of an enterprise wide project, and the monitoring of the status of a system.

12. The method of

claim 1

, wherein the plurality of issues comprises issues of a type selected from the group consisting of issues that must be reported to other persons, issues that do not need to be reported, and issues that need to be reported on a periodic basis.

13. A method of communicating about an issue in an organized fashion, comprising:

receiving a communication about the issue;

making a decision as to whether to communicate information about the issue to a higher level of a hierarchy, a lower level of the hierarchy, or across the hierarchy based upon a set of pre-established criteria;

wherein the pre-established criteria and hierarchy were previously established by

creating a communications list comprising at least one person that is to be informed of the issue,

organizing the communications list hierarchically,

establishing pre-established criteria identifying when information about the at least one of the plurality of issues should be communicated to a higher level in the hierarchy, a lower level of the hierarchy, or across the hierarchy.

14. The method of

claim 13

, further comprising:

taking actions in response to the issue and a pre-established identification of actions to be taken in response to the issue.

15. The method of

claim 13

, wherein at least some of the pre-established criteria require human judgment as to whether information about the at least one of the plurality of issues should be communicated.

16. The method of

claim 13

, wherein the hierarchy comprises a plurality of groups comprising at least one member wherein the members of a group comprise one or more persons on the communications list.

17. The method of

claim 16

, wherein each group has an electronic group mailbox associated with it.

18. The method of

claim 17

, wherein the electronic group mailbox is managed by at least one person with decision making authority for the group.

19. The method of

claim 13

, wherein the issue comprises one issue in a set of issues related to a subject selected from the group consisting of the deployment of a new system, the deployment of a new service, the response to a crisis, the location of expertise, the implementation of an enterprise wide project, and the monitoring of the status of a system.

20. A work of authorship, comprising:

a communication embodied in a tangible medium of expression wherein the communication was generated by

receiving information about an issue;

making a decision to generate the communication about the issue in response to the information and a set of pre-established criteria, the communication generated for purposes of informing at least one of a higher level of a hierarchy, a lower level of the hierarchy, or across the hierarchy;

wherein the pre-established criteria and hierarchy were previously established by

creating a communications list comprising at least one person that is to be informed of the issue,

organizing the communications list hierarchically,

establishing pre-established criteria identifying when information about the at least one of the plurality of issues should be communicated to a higher level in the hierarchy, a lower level of the hierarchy, or across the hierarchy.

21. The work of authorship of

claim 20

, wherein at least some of the pre-established criteria require human judgment as to whether information about the at least one of the plurality of issues should be communicated.

22. The work of authorship of

claim 20

, wherein the hierarchy comprises a plurality of groups comprising at least one member wherein the members of a group comprise one or more persons on the communications list.

23. The work of authorship of

claim 22

, wherein each group has an electronic group mailbox associated with it.