Traffic information & pricing (TIP) system

• US 20020072963A1
• Filed: 09/07/2001
• Published: 06/13/2002
• Est. Priority Date: 03/09/1999
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Wiebren D.E. Jonge
• Original Assignee: Wiebren D.E. Jonge
• Inventors: Jonge, Wiebren de
• Application Number:
  US09/948,845
• Publication Number:
  US 20020072963A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/13
• CPC Class Codes: G07B 15/02 taking into account a variable factor such as distance or time, e.g. for passenger transport, parking systems or car rental systems G07B15/06 takes precedence; taximeters G07B13/00; parking meters per se G07F17/24; car rental systems per se G07B15/00
• CPC Class Codes: G07B 15/063 using wireless information transmission between the vehicle and a fixed station identification of vehicles G08G
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/01 Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled G08G1/07 - G08G1/14 take precedence

Abstract

The TIP-system concerns a class of systems for collecting and/or disseminating information in relation to traffic, whereby information about individual persons and/or vehicles can be collected and checked on reliability (trustworthiness) in such a way that yet sufficient (privacy) protection can be offered against illegitimate tracing of individual persons and/or vehicles. Also, these systems can easily be prepared for future expansion (extensions), refinements and possible other changes. So, one may start using a simple variation and gradually introduce more and more applications and refinements. TIP-systems can be used, for example, for imposing all sorts of traffic fees, that is, for traffic pricing. In case of road traffic it is, for example, possible to charge for all distances traveled and to relate the fee for each distance unit traveled, if desired, to the place where and/or to the date, the point in time and/or the traffic intensity when that distance unit was traveled, to the brand, model, year of make, gearbox type and engine type of the vehicle used to the gear engaged, the number of revolutions, the fuel consumption, the noise production, the speed and/or speed changes when traveling the distance unit with that vehicle, and/or to the environmental pollution caused. Reducing noise nuisance by aircraft is another example of a possible application. Keywords: electronic toll collection (ETC), traffic pricing, proportionate pricing, continuous pricing, discrete pricing, odometer-based fee, mileage fee, kilometer fee, kilometer tax, road pricing, congestion pricing, pollution pricing, privacy protection, tracing, fraud resistance, controls, checks, verification, identification, semi-identification, agent, hunter, intermediary, reachability, congestion, traffic congestion information, traffic delay, environmental pollution, fuel consumption, noise nuisance, traffic fee, traffic tax, toll, meter reading, odometer, speedometer, tachometer, revolution-counter, automatic calibration, cruise control, rolling tester, taximeter, tachograph, black box.

Claims

1. Method for collecting traffic information by or on behalf of an authority in order to levy a traffic fee concerning vehicle traffic

a) whereby traffic information required for determining the amounts of traffic fee due is collected from a set of vehicles and

whereby for vehicles in that set during their traffic participation traffic information related to the vehicle in question, such as information about the distances covered by that vehicle, is supplied to a processor present in that vehicle, and

this traffic information is processed by that processor, and all or a subset of the processed traffic information is stored by that processor, and

b) whereby the reliability of the in vehicles processed traffic information required for determining the amounts of traffic fee due, such as speed or odometer readings, is randomly checked by or on behalf of the authority by comparing samples of this information with samples of traffic information that have been independently determined by or on behalf of the authority at a distance from the randomly sampled and checked vehicles during their traffic participation and

whereby each such a comparison consists of comparing a sample of the in the checked vehicle processed traffic information that is related to that vehicle during a particular period, such as the speed of that vehicle at a particular moment according to the information received by the processor in question, with a similar sample of traffic information that concerns that same vehicle in the same period and that has been independently determined at a distance from that checked vehicle, such as the actual speed as independently measured from outside that vehicle, and

whereby communication between the checked vehicle concerned and the authority outside that vehicle by means of a transmitter and a receiver is used for transmitting a sample of the in the vehicle processed traffic information and/or a sample of traffic information that has been independently determined at a distance from that checked vehicle, to a place of traffic information comparison.

2. :

Method according to claim 1 whereby random checks as described in clause b of claim 1 are applied to vehicles at by or on behalf of the authority randomly chosen, varying places.

3. :

Method according to claim 1 whereby random checks as described in claim 1 or claim 2 are performed from mobile checkpoints, such as moving patrol vehicles.

4. :

Method according to claim 1 whereby some or all of the comparisons described in clause b of claim 1 are performed by or on behalf of the authority at a place outside the checked vehicle in question, for example along a road, and whereby the sample of the in said vehicle processed traffic information needed for a particular comparison, such as the currently by the processor in said vehicle observed speed and/or applied kind of tariff is received at the place of comparison in question, which is outside said vehicle, from the processor in said vehicle by means of communication via a transmitter in said vehicle and a receiver outside said vehicle.

5. :

Method according to claim 1 whereby some or all of the comparisons described in clause b of claim 1 are performed by or on behalf of the authority by the processor present in the checked vehicle in question and whereby the from outside said vehicle determined sample of traffic information needed for a particular comparison, such as the measured actual speed and/or the kind of tariff that should be applied in this case, is received by said processor in that vehicle by means of communication via a transmitter outside said vehicle and a receiver in said vehicle.

6. :

Method according to claim 1 whereby the processor sends during traffic participation at a prescribed rate declarations with piece(s) of traffic information related to the vehicle in question towards the authority outside that vehicle by means of a transmitter with a prescribed range.

7. :

Method according to claim 6 whereby further processing of the by the authority outside said vehicle received traffic information does not require all from said vehicle towards the authority transmitted declarations with piece(s) of traffic information to be received by the authority outside said vehicle.

8. :

Method according to claim 1 whereby the processor represents the authority in the vehicle in question and does on behalf of the authority receive during traffic participation piece(s) of traffic information supplied to it at a prescribed rate, so that the authority receives during traffic participation at a prescribed rate declarations in the vehicle in question.

9. :

Method according to claim 8 whereby the processor representing the authority in a vehicle in question does at appropriate moments supply a) data that directly or indirectly identifies a payer or a vehicle user, holder or owner, and also b) certain in said vehicle collected information related to said vehicle, such as meter reading(s) giving the total distance covered and/or the total traffic fee due, to the part of the authority outside the vehicle, for example in order to enable that part of the authority to collect the traffic fee(s) due for the use of said vehicle.

10. :

Method according to claim 1 whereby the vehicle user, holder and/or owner or equipment on behalf of the vehicle user, holder and/or owner has control over the communication channel(s) between the processor in the vehicle and a transmitter in the vehicle, so that (s)he or it can supervise or control e.g. the contents and/or frequency of messages transmitted via that transmitter by the processor in the vehicle, for example in order to protect his or her privacy.

11. :

Method according to claim 1 whereby the vehicle user, holder and/or owner or equipment on behalf of the vehicle user, holder and/or owner has control over the communication channel(s) between the processor in the vehicle and a receiver in the vehicle, so that (s)he or it can supervise or control e.g. the contents and/or frequency of messages received via that receiver by the processor in the vehicle, for example in order to protect his or her privacy.

12. :

Method according to claim 1 whereby at least part of the communication between vehicles and the authority goes via one or more organizations that are independent from the authority and that help to protect the privacy of vehicle users, holders and/or owners.

13. :

Method according to claim 1 whereby random checks as described in a preceding claim are applied to vehicles during their traffic participation.

14. :

Method according to claim 1 whereby the traffic information that during a random check is transmitted to the place of traffic information comparison, includes a meter reading.

15. Method according to claim 1 whereby the traffic information that during a random check is transmitted to the place of traffic information comparison, includes an odometer meter reading or a speed.

16. :

Method according to claim 1 whereby the traffic information that during a random check is transmitted to the place of traffic information comparison, includes a traffic fee meter reading or its speed of increase or decrease.

17. :

Method according to claim 1 whereby the communication during a random check between the checked vehicle concerned and the authority outside that vehicle for transmitting a sample of traffic information to the place of traffic information comparison occurs by means of sound waves or radio waves or infrared waves or light waves.

18. :

System that comprises a processor and also a transmitter and/or receiver, used for carrying out a method according to claim 1.